RECORD
Testing the see-saw mechanism at collider energies
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 2 Nov 2004
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our analysis opens up the possibility that the mechanism responsible for neutrino mass is testable at colliders such as the LHC or VLHC.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We propose a low energy extension of the Standard Model consisting of an additional gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ plus three right-handed neutrinos. The lightest right-handed neutrinos have TeV scale masses and may be produced at colliders via their couplings to the $Z_{B-L}$ gauge boson whose mass and gauge coupling is constrained by the out-of-equilibrium condition leading to upper bounds on the right-handed neutrino and $Z_{B-L}$ production cross-sections at colliders. We propose a brane-world scenario which motivates such TeV mass right-handed neutrinos. Our analysis opens up the possibility that the mechanism responsible for neutrino mass is testable at colliders such as the LHC or VLHC.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We propose a low energy extension of the Standard Model consisting of an additional gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ plus three right-handed neutrinos. | contribution 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.05 | asserted 0.91 |
| s1 | The lightest right-handed neutrinos have TeV scale masses and may be produced at colliders via their couplings to the $Z_{B-L}$ gauge boson whose mass and gauge coupling is constrained by the out-of-equilibrium condition leading to upper bounds on the right-handed neutrino and $Z_{B-L}$ production cross-sections at colliders. | result 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.13 | hedged possibility 0.97 |
| s2 | We propose a brane-world scenario which motivates such TeV mass right-handed neutrinos. | contribution 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.06 | asserted 0.86 |
| s3 | Our analysis opens up the possibility that the mechanism responsible for neutrino mass is testable at colliders such as the LHC or VLHC. | interpretation 0.97 | 0.55 | 0.79 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We propose a low energy extension of the Standard Model consisting of an additional gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ plus three right-handed neutrinos. The lightest right-handed neutrinos have TeV scale masses and may be produced at colliders via their couplings to the $Z_{B-L}$ gauge boson whose mass and gauge coupling is constrained by the out-of-equilibrium condition leading to upper bounds on the right-handed neutrino and $Z_{B-L}$ production cross-sections at colliders. We propose a brane-world scenario which motivates such TeV mass right-handed neutrinos. Our analysis opens up the possibility that the mechanism responsible for neutrino mass is testable at colliders such as the LHC or VLHC.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
7 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences
Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
In general there are three classes of proposals in the literature for the new physics at the scale $Λ$: * Several types of Majorana seesaw mechanisms [ref] ; also in addition low (TeV) scale seesaw mechanisms [ref] (with the Weinberg operator resulting from the mass $M$ of a heavy particle exchanged at tree-level with $Λ=M$).
Neutrino Mass and Mixing with Modular Symmetry · A brief survey of neutrino mass and mixing · 0.94
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.