Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0412322 v2 · submitted 21 Dec 2004

Spatial 't Hooft loop to cubic order in hot QCD II

P. Giovannangeli, C. P. Korthals Altes

The paper says

“In this paper we provide an exact formula for the area law of the 't Hooft loop for any SU(N) gauge group to cubic order in hot gauge theory.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In this paper we provide an exact formula for the area law of the 't Hooft loop for any SU(N) gauge group to cubic order in hot gauge theory. The correction is very small for all temperatures above Tc, in stark contrast to the cubic correction to the pressure. The gradient approximation in a previous paper, only valid for large N, is in excellent agreement with the present, exact evalution. Comparison to lattice data is good. Casimir scaling is violated by a small amount not yet resolved by the precision of lattice data.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.83 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.18 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In this paper we provide an exact formula for the area law of the 't Hooft loop for any SU(N) gauge group to cubic order in hot gauge theory. contribution 0.85 0.96 0.88 asserted 1.00
The correction is very small for all temperatures above $T_c$, in stark contrast to the cubic correction to the pressure. result 0.80 0.85 0.16 asserted 1.00
The gradient approximation in a previous paper, only valid for large N, is in excellent agreement with the present, exact evalution. result 0.83 0.51 0.05 asserted 1.00
Comparison to lattice data is good. result 0.99 0.82 0.05 asserted 1.00
Casimir scaling is violated by a small amount not yet resolved by the precision of lattice data. result 0.89 0.73 0.05 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,140 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Two-loop QCD gauge coupling at high temperatures hep-ph · Mar 2005
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment