Pith. Sign in

RECORD

One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC (I). The charged current case

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 11 Jun 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Complete one-loop electroweak corrections are calculated within the automatic SANC system.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0506110 (version 2)
Pith IDVJDGPBYG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, G. Nanava, L. Kalinovskaya, P. Christova, R. Sadykov, S. Bondarenko. "One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC (I). The charged current case." arXiv:hep-ph/0506110 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/VJDGPBYG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,419 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Radiative corrections to the charged current Drell-Yan processes are revisited. Complete one-loop electroweak corrections are calculated within the automatic SANC system. Electroweak scheme dependence and the choice of the factorization scale are discussed. Comparisons with earlier calculations are presented.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Radiative corrections to the charged current Drell-Yan processes are revisited. background 0.53 0.68 0.06 asserted 0.90
s1 Complete one-loop electroweak corrections are calculated within the automatic SANC system. contribution 0.57 0.95 0.20 asserted 1.00
s2 Electroweak scheme dependence and the choice of the factorization scale are discussed. contribution 0.81 0.68 0.07 asserted 0.77
s3 Comparisons with earlier calculations are presented. contribution 0.78 0.76 0.07 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Radiative corrections to the charged current Drell-Yan processes are revisited. Complete one-loop electroweak corrections are calculated within the automatic SANC system. Electroweak scheme dependence and the choice of the factorization scale are discussed. Comparisons with earlier calculations are presented.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

39 arXiv papers cite this in 52 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 25 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • * step brdq, i.e. $(Δσ̂)^$, via call ProcessBrdq_(EW,QCD) (...,brdq,...) a) first part, i.e. $(Δσ̂^Virt+Soft)^$, * is computed by SSFM call cc$_$bo$_$xy$_$zv(...,born), multiplied by $(δ^SV)^$ — a CC analog of Eq.(19) of [ref] b) second part, i.e. $(dσ̂^Hard)^$ is computed by integration over $ξ$ of the function_(ew,qcd)_1s * and by SSFM call cc$_$bo$_$xy$_$zv(...,bornk), using Eq.(12) of [ref]

    Standard SANC Modules · Overview of the packages · 0.91

Cites it as background 24 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.