pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28667 · v1 · pith:AAA52H5Xnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the complete fermionic contributions

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Drell-Yan processelectroweak correctionstwo-loop calculationsfermionic contributionsvirtual correctionsStandard Modellepton pair production
0
0 comments X

The pith

The complete set of two-loop fermionic virtual corrections to the Drell-Yan process has been computed and rendered finite.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates all second-order virtual corrections involving closed fermionic loops for the process of up-quark annihilation into muon pairs within the electroweak Standard Model. These contributions are ultraviolet-renormalized and infrared-subtracted to yield a finite piece of the cross section. The calculation relies on an automated methodology that the authors test explicitly. Such results supply one required component for next-to-next-to-leading-order electroweak predictions of inclusive lepton-pair production at colliders.

Core claim

We present the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite contribution of the complete set of second-order virtual corrections with a closed fermionic loop, to the cross section of the process u u-bar to mu+ mu-. The evaluation of these contributions is based on an automated methodology, whose validity is discussed with explicit tests. These corrections are one of the building blocks necessary for the simulation of the inclusive lepton-pair production cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order in the electroweak interaction.

What carries the argument

An automated methodology for evaluating two-loop virtual corrections that include closed fermionic loops in the electroweak Standard Model.

If this is right

  • The finite fermionic corrections supply one building block for NNLO electroweak simulations of inclusive lepton-pair production.
  • Explicit tests of the automated methodology support its reliability for these diagrams.
  • The results address the closed-fermion-loop subset of the full two-loop virtual corrections needed for precision cross-section predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The remaining two-loop bosonic corrections would need analogous treatment to reach a complete NNLO electroweak result.
  • The same automated approach could be applied to related processes such as vector-boson scattering or Higgs production.
  • Direct numerical comparison against independent implementations of the same diagrams would offer an additional cross-check beyond the tests already performed.

Load-bearing premise

The automated methodology used to evaluate the corrections is valid, as supported by the explicit tests mentioned in the abstract.

What would settle it

An independent analytic or numerical evaluation of the same complete set of two-loop fermionic diagrams that yields a different finite result after renormalization and subtraction would falsify the presented contribution.

read the original abstract

We discuss the production of a lepton pair in quark-antiquark annihilation in the electroweak Standard Model. We present the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite contribution of the complete set of second-order virtual corrections with a closed fermionic loop, to the cross section of the process $u\bar u\to \mu^+\mu^-$. The evaluation of these contributions is based on an automated methodology, whose validity is discussed with explicit tests. These corrections are one of the building blocks necessary for the simulation of the inclusive lepton-pair production cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order in the electroweak interaction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes and presents the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite remainder arising from the complete set of two-loop virtual diagrams containing at least one closed fermionic loop for the partonic process u ū → μ⁺ μ⁻ in the electroweak Standard Model. The evaluation relies on an automated pipeline whose validity is asserted via explicit tests; the result is positioned explicitly as one necessary building block toward a full NNLO electroweak prediction for inclusive Drell-Yan production.

Significance. If the reported finite remainder is correct, the work supplies a non-trivial component of the two-loop electroweak virtual corrections to a flagship LHC process. Automated methods with documented tests are a positive feature for reproducibility in multi-loop calculations. The contribution remains partial (fermionic loops only), but it is a concrete, falsifiable step that can be cross-checked by independent groups once the full analytic or numeric expressions are released.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'explicit tests' of the automated methodology; the main text should include a dedicated subsection (or table) that enumerates the diagram classes, the IR subtraction scheme, and the numerical or analytic cross-checks performed, with at least one concrete example of a cancellation or limit test.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript, the positive assessment of its significance, and the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents a direct perturbative computation of the UV-renormalised and IR-subtracted two-loop fermionic virtual corrections to u u-bar to mu+ mu- using an automated methodology whose validity is checked via explicit tests. The central result is the explicit construction of this finite remainder from the complete set of closed-fermion-loop diagrams; no step reduces by construction to a fitted input, a self-citation chain, or a renamed ansatz. The work is positioned only as one building block for a future NNLO calculation, with no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or parameter fit invoked from prior self-work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard perturbative quantum field theory techniques within the electroweak Standard Model; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The process is described within the electroweak Standard Model.
    The calculation targets corrections in the SM electroweak sector.
  • standard math Standard ultraviolet renormalization and infrared subtraction procedures apply to render the two-loop amplitudes finite.
    The abstract explicitly refers to UV-renormalised and IR-subtracted finite contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5639 in / 1256 out tokens · 33665 ms · 2026-06-29T11:33:02.340183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [2]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Combinatorics of gauge fields,Nucl. Phys. B50(1972) 318–353

  2. [3]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model, Commun. Math. Phys.42(1975) 127–162

  3. [4]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.98 (1976) 287–321

  4. [5]

    D. A. Ross and J. C. Taylor,Renormalization of a unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions,Nucl. Phys. B51(1973) 125–144

  5. [6]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Scalar One Loop Integrals,Nucl. Phys. B153(1979) 365–401

  6. [7]

    Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman,One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151–207. [8]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(20...

  7. [8]

    D. Y. Bardin et al.,Electroweak working group report, inWorkshop Group on Precision Calculations for the Z Resonance (2nd meeting held Mar 31, 3rd meeting held Jun 13), 9, 1997,hep-ph/9709229. – 29 –

  8. [9]

    Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys

    A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys. Rev.D22(1980) 971–981

  9. [10]

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2695

  10. [11]

    Dubovyk, A

    I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann and J. Usovitsch,Electroweak pseudo-observables and Z-boson form factors at two-loop accuracy,JHEP08(2019) 113, [1906.08815]

  11. [12]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Drell-Yan Cross Section to Third Order in the Strong Coupling Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 172001, [2001.07717]

  12. [13]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Charged current Drell-Yan production at N 3LO, JHEP11(2020) 143, [2007.13313]

  13. [14]

    Duhr and B

    C. Duhr and B. Mistlberger,Lepton-pair production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD, JHEP03(2022) 116, [2111.10379]

  14. [15]

    Electroweak radiative corrections to W-boson production at hadron colliders

    S. Dittmaier and M. Kr¨ amer,Electroweak radiative corrections to W boson production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 073007, [hep-ph/0109062]

  15. [16]

    Electroweak Radiative Corrections to pp/ppbar -> W+/- -> l+/- nu Beyond the Pole Approximation

    U. Baur and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections top¯p→W ± →ℓ ±νbeyond the pole approximation,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 073015, [hep-ph/0405191]

  16. [17]

    Zykunov,Radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process at large dilepton invariant masses,Phys

    V. Zykunov,Radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process at large dilepton invariant masses,Phys. Atom. Nucl.69(2006) 1522

  17. [18]

    One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC (I). The charged current case

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava and R. Sadykov,One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC. I. The Charged current case,Eur. Phys. J. C46(2006) 407–412, [hep-ph/0506110]

  18. [19]

    Precision electroweak calculation of the charged current Drell-Yan process

    C. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini and A. Vicini,Precision electroweak calculation of the charged current Drell-Yan process,JHEP12(2006) 016, [hep-ph/0609170]

  19. [20]

    U. Baur, O. Brein, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan processes at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 033007, [hep-ph/0108274]

  20. [21]

    Weak radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process for large invariant mass of a dilepton pair

    V. Zykunov,Weak radiative corrections to Drell-Yan process for large invariant mass of di-lepton pair,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 073019, [hep-ph/0509315]

  21. [22]

    Precision electroweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders

    C. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini and A. Vicini,Precision electroweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders, JHEP10(2007) 109, [0710.1722]

  22. [23]

    One-loop corrections to the Drell--Yan process in SANC (II). The neutral current case

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava and R. Sadykov,One-loop corrections to the Drell–Yan process in SANC. (II). The Neutral current case,Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 451–460, [0711.0625]

  23. [24]

    Radiative corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process in the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension

    S. Dittmaier and M. Huber,Radiative corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process in the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension,JHEP01(2010) 060, [0911.2329]

  24. [25]

    Bonciani, L

    R. Bonciani, L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, N. Rana, F. Tramontano and A. Vicini, Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 012002, [2106.11953]. – 30 –

  25. [26]

    Buccioni, F

    F. Buccioni, F. Caola, H. A. Chawdhry, F. Devoto, M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel, K. Melnikov, R. R¨ ontsch and C. Signorile-Signorile,Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to dilepton production at the LHC in the high invariant mass region,JHEP06(2022) 022, [2203.11237]

  26. [27]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to charged current Drell-Yan,JHEP07(2024) 265, [2405.00612]

  27. [28]

    Sudakov Effects in Electroweak Corrections

    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli,Sudakov enhancement of electroweak corrections,Phys. Lett. B 446(1999) 278–284, [hep-ph/9809321]

  28. [29]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Pozzorini,One loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections

  29. [30]

    Results,Eur. Phys. J. C18(2001) 461–480, [hep-ph/0010201]

  30. [31]

    Two-loop electroweak next-to-leading logarithmic corrections to massless fermionic processes

    A. Denner, B. Jantzen and S. Pozzorini,Two-loop electroweak next-to-leading logarithmic corrections to massless fermionic processes,Nucl. Phys. B761(2007) 1–62, [hep-ph/0608326]

  31. [32]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Rode,Automated resummation of electroweak Sudakov logarithms in diboson production at future colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 542, [2402.10503]

  32. [33]

    de Blas, Y

    J. de Blas, Y. Du, C. Grojean, J. Gu, V. Miralles, M. E. Peskin, J. Tian, M. Vos and E. Vryonidou,Global SMEFT Fits at Future Colliders, inSnowmass 2021, 6, 2022, 2206.08326. [35]FCCcollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Experiments, Detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1468, [2505.00272]

  33. [34]

    New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach

    T. Armadillo, E. Celada, J. ter Hoeve, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, S. Tentori, M. O. A. Thomas and E. Vryonidou,New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach,2604.16596

  34. [35]

    Two-Loop Electroweak Logarithms in Four-Fermion Processes at High Energy

    B. Jantzen, J. H. Kuhn, A. A. Penin and V. A. Smirnov,Two-loop electroweak logarithms in four-fermion processes at high energy,Nucl. Phys. B731(2005) 188–212, [hep-ph/0509157]

  35. [36]

    Pagani and M

    D. Pagani and M. Zaro,One-loop electroweak Sudakov logarithms: a revisitation and automation,JHEP02(2022) 161, [2110.03714]

  36. [37]

    Chiesa, C

    M. Chiesa, C. L. Del Pio and F. Piccinini,On electroweak corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan with the POWHEG BOX,2402.14659

  37. [38]

    Two-loop renormalization of the electric charge in the Standard Model

    G. Degrassi and A. Vicini,Two loop renormalization of the electric charge in the standard model,Phys. Rev.D69(2004) 073007, [hep-ph/0307122]

  38. [39]

    Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part II: Renormalization Procedures and Computational Techniques

    S. Actis and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part II: Renormalization Procedures and Computational Techniques,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 35–99, [hep-ph/0612123]

  39. [40]

    Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part III: Renormalization Equations and their Solutions

    S. Actis and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part III: Renormalization Equations and their Solutions,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 100–156, [hep-ph/0612124]

  40. [41]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Collider Physics,Phys. Rept.864(2020) 1–163, [1912.06823]

  41. [42]

    Dittmaier,Electric charge renormalization to all orders,Phys

    S. Dittmaier,Electric charge renormalization to all orders,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 053006, [2101.05154]. – 31 –

  42. [43]

    Armadillo, S

    T. Armadillo, S. Devoto, M. Dradi and A. Vicini,Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the infrared structure,2511.20365

  43. [44]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189–213

  44. [45]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensionally Renormalized Green’s Functions for Theories with Massless Particles. 1.,Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 39

  45. [46]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensionally Renormalized Green’s Functions for Theories with Massless Particles. 2.,Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 55

  46. [47]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle, Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 11–38

  47. [48]

    Kreimer,Theγ(5) Problem and Anomalies: A Clifford Algebra Approach,Phys

    D. Kreimer,Theγ(5) Problem and Anomalies: A Clifford Algebra Approach,Phys. Lett. B 237(1990) 59–62

  48. [49]

    J. G. Korner, D. Kreimer and K. Schilcher,A Practicable gamma(5) scheme in dimensional regularization,Z. Phys. C54(1992) 503–512

  49. [50]

    The Role of $\gamma_5$ in Dimensional Regularization

    D. Kreimer,The Role of gamma(5) in dimensional regularization,hep-ph/9401354

  50. [51]

    Heller, A

    M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger and H. Spiesberger,Mixed EW-QCD two-loop amplitudes forq¯q→ℓ +ℓ− andγ 5 scheme independence of multi-loop corrections, JHEP05(2021) 213, [2012.05918]

  51. [52]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282 (2023) 108545, [2205.03345]

  52. [53]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565, [2201.11669]

  53. [54]

    Armadillo, S

    T. Armadillo, S. Devoto, M. Dradi and A. Vicini,Abiss: a tool for squared matrix element calculations in dimensional regularisation,in preparation(2026)

  54. [55]

    Electroweak two-loop corrections to the MW-MZ mass correlation in the Standard Model

    A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter and G. Weiglein,Electroweak two loop corrections to the MW −M Z mass correlation in the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B632(2002) 189–218, [hep-ph/0202131]

  55. [56]

    Complete Two Loop Electroweak Contributions to the Muon Lifetime in the Standard Model

    M. Awramik and M. Czakon,Complete two loop electroweak contributions to the muon lifetime in the standard model,Phys. Lett. B568(2003) 48–54, [hep-ph/0305248]

  56. [57]

    Y. Du, A. Freitas, H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Parity-Violating Møller Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order: Closed Fermion Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 131801, [1912.08220]

  57. [58]

    Fermionic Electroweak Two-Loop Corrections to Drell-Yan and Related Processes

    A. Freitas and E. J. Wallace,Fermionic Electroweak Two-Loop Corrections to Drell-Yan and Related Processes,2512.15700

  58. [59]

    Application of the Background-Field Method to the electroweak Standard Model

    A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier,Application of the background field method to the electroweak standard model,Nucl. Phys. B440(1995) 95–128, [hep-ph/9410338]

  59. [60]

    Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part I: Prolegomena

    S. Actis, A. Ferroglia, M. Passera and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model. Part I: Prolegomena,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 1–34, [hep-ph/0612122]

  60. [61]

    Electroweak corrections to charged-current e+e- --> 4 fermion processes - technical details and further results

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth and L. H. Wieders,Electroweak corrections to charged-current e+ e- —>4 fermion processes: Technical details and further results,Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 247–294, [hep-ph/0505042]. – 32 –

  61. [62]

    Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

    T. Hahn,Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,Comput. Phys. Commun.140(2001) 418–431, [hep-ph/0012260]

  62. [63]

    The Complex-Mass Scheme and Unitarity in perturbative Quantum Field Theory

    A. Denner and J.-N. Lang,The Complex-Mass Scheme and Unitarity in perturbative Quantum Field Theory,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 377, [1406.6280]

  63. [64]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao and M. Zaro,The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations,JHEP07(2018) 185, [1804.10017]

  64. [65]

    Reduction of general two-loop self-energies to standard scalar integrals

    G. Weiglein, R. Scharf and M. Bohm,Reduction of general two loop selfenergies to standard scalar integrals,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 606–644, [hep-ph/9310358]

  65. [66]

    Gauge Invariance of Green Functions: Background-Field Method versus Pinch Technique

    A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier,Gauge invariance of Green functions: Background field method versus pinch technique,Phys. Lett. B333(1994) 420–426, [hep-ph/9406204]

  66. [67]

    Dyson summation without violating Ward identities and the Goldstone-boson equivalence theorem

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Dyson summation without violating Ward identities and the Goldstone boson equivalence theorem,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 4499–4514, [hep-ph/9603341]

  67. [68]

    Fleischer and F

    J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner,Radiative Corrections to Higgs Decays in the Extended Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2001–2026

  68. [69]

    Sirlin and R

    A. Sirlin and R. Zucchini,Dependence of the Quartic Coupling H(m) on M(H) and the Possible Onset of New Physics in the Higgs Sector of the Standard Model,Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986) 389–409

  69. [70]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059, [1310.1145]

  70. [71]

    A. I. Davydychev and J. B. Tausk,Two loop selfenergy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion,Nucl. Phys. B397(1993) 123–142

  71. [72]

    Higgs Pseudo-Observables, Second Riemann Sheet and All That

    G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati,Higgs Pseudo-Observables, Second Riemann Sheet and All That,Nucl. Phys. B834(2010) 77–115, [1001.3360]

  72. [73]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,2505.20197

  73. [74]

    Klappert, S

    J. Klappert, S. Y. Klein and F. Lange,Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun.264(2021) 107968, [2004.01463]

  74. [75]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan,JHEP05(2022) 072, [2201.01754]

  75. [76]

    Buccioni, J.-N

    F. Buccioni, J.-N. Lang, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierh¨ ofer, S. Pozzorini, H. Zhang and M. F. Zoller,OpenLoops 2,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, [1907.13071]. – 33 –