Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Role of $\gamma_5$ in Dimensional Regularization

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 Jan 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Further we show that this \gf-scheme does not modify the BRST identities at any loop orders in contrast to BM type schemes.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9401354 (version 1)
Pith IDHL6UAFAU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDirk Kreimer. "The Role of $\gamma_5$ in Dimensional Regularization." arXiv:hep-ph/9401354 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/HL6UAFAU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,478 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We discuss the consistency of a new \gf -scheme with renormalization. In particular we study the power-counting behaviour of multiloop graphs to prove its consistency. As a side effect we obtain a short proof of the Adler-Bardeen theorem. Further we show that this \gf-scheme does not modify the BRST identities at any loop orders in contrast to BM type schemes.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We discuss the consistency of a new \gf -scheme with renormalization. contribution 0.99 0.85 0.16 unclear 0.51
s1 In particular we study the power-counting behaviour of multiloop graphs to prove its consistency. method 0.67 0.94 0.14 asserted 0.98
s2 As a side effect we obtain a short proof of the Adler-Bardeen theorem. result 0.98 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 Further we show that this \gf-scheme does not modify the BRST identities at any loop orders in contrast to BM type schemes. result 0.98 0.94 0.28 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We discuss the consistency of a new \gf -scheme with renormalization. In particular we study the power-counting behaviour of multiloop graphs to prove its consistency. As a side effect we obtain a short proof of the Adler-Bardeen theorem. Further we show that this \gf-scheme does not modify the BRST identities at any loop orders in contrast to BM type schemes.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

32 arXiv papers cite this in 87 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 57 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 2 papers
  • [ref] for amplitudes with external axial anomaly: the ABJ anomaly equation does not hold automatically in the bare form, and the Adler-Bardeen theorem [ref] is not observed, in this treatment.[As a kind reminder, the appearance of the (gauge-non-invariant) Chern-Simons current term in the renormalization of the singlet axial-current in QCD [ref] shall not be taken as a counter-example to the general theorem on renormalization, but rather viewed as manifestation of a technical regularization issue: if the dimensional regularization scheme in use violates certain gauge symmetry or 4-dimensional $5$-involved relations (e.g. the ABJ equation), counter-terms may be added to restore those relations which are non-invariant in general (see, e.g. [ref] ).] There was also an outline of how the procedure may be performed in an algorithmic manner beyond the QCD corrections in ref.

    A Procedure g5anchor to Anchor $\gamma_5$ in Feynman Diagrams for the Standard Model · Introduction · contest 0.87

  • To our surprise, through the calculation of the matrix element of an external singlet axial-current operator between the vacuum and a pair of gluons, i.e. the vector–vector–axial-vector (VVA) current-correlator, in QCD with an anticommuting $γ_5$ treated according to Kreimer scheme [ref] ,[apart from a different practical treatment of the Levi-Civita tensor, which we think should not affect the conclusion and will be discussed in detail later in the text] we find that the answer to the above question is, unfortunately, negative.

    An observation on Feynman diagrams with axial anomalous subgraphs in dimensional regularization with an anticommuting $\gamma_5$ · Introduction · contest 0.87

Uses its method or tool 8 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
  • On the other hand, up to 3-loop order, the difference between our treatment of $5$ from the prescriptions [ref] is not very essential, and mainly concerns the technical side and practical convenience, as well as possibly the recipe for those with intermediate IR divergences[To avoid confusion, note that even for diagrams below 4-loop orders, the bare expressions determined in our prescription are in general different from those using the prescriptions [ref] , and shall not be compared naively at the bare level.] (to be discussed in the next subsection).

    A Procedure g5anchor to Anchor $\gamma_5$ in Feynman Diagrams for the Standard Model · Discussions on the multiplicative renormalizability to be checked · 0.99

Cites it as background 14 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.