Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0507263 v3 · submitted 22 Jul 2005

Dark matter and Colliders searches in the MSSM

Y. Mambrini, E. Nezri

The paper says

“The future experiments will cover a large part of the parameter space of the MSSM favored by WMAP constraint on the relic density, but there still exist some regions beyond reach for some extreme (fine tuned) values of the supersymmetric parameters.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We study the complementarity between dark matter experiments (direct detection and indirect detections) and accelerator facilities (the CERN LHC and a √s = 1 TeV e+e− Linear Collider) in the framework of the constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). We show how non–universality in the scalar and gaugino sectors can affect the experimental prospects to discover the supersymmetric particles. The future experiments will cover a large part of the parameter space of the MSSM favored by WMAP constraint on the relic density, but there still exist some regions beyond reach for some extreme (fine tuned) values of the supersymmetric parameters. Whereas the Focus Point region characterized by heavy scalars will be easily probed by experiments searching for dark matter, the regions with heavy gauginos and light sfermions will be accessible more easily by collider experiments. More informations on both supersymmetry and astrophysics parameters can be thus obtained by correlating the different signals.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.87

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.28 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We study the complementarity between dark matter experiments (direct detection and indirect detections) and accelerator facilities (the CERN LHC and a $\sqrt{s}= 1$ TeV $e^+e^-$ Linear Collider) in the framework of the constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). contribution 1.00 0.80 0.07 asserted 0.85
We show how non--universality in the scalar and gaugino sectors can affect the experimental prospects to discover the supersymmetric particles. contribution 0.51 0.81 0.08 asserted 0.97
The future experiments will cover a large part of the parameter space of the MSSM favored by WMAP constraint on the relic density, but there still exist some regions beyond reach for some extreme (fine tuned) values of the supersymmetric parameters. result 0.90 0.64 0.38 asserted 0.87
Whereas the Focus Point region characterized by heavy scalars will be easily probed by experiments searching for dark matter, the regions with heavy gauginos and light sfermions will be accessible more easily by collider experiments. result 0.75 0.60 0.31 asserted 0.88
More informations on both supersymmetry and astrophysics parameters can be thus obtained by correlating the different signals. interpretation 0.99 0.24 0.27 asserted 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.65 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.90

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v3

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,468 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 5 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment