Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Aug 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0508081 (version 1)
Pith IDU5WSS4O7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJoaquim Prades, Jose A. Oller, Michela Verbeni. "Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics." arXiv:hep-ph/0508081 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/U5WSS4O7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,555 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.16 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Low energy \bar{K}N interactions are studied within Unitary Chiral Perturbation Theory at next-to-leading order with ten coupled channels. We pay special attention to the recent precise determination of the strong shift and width of the kaonic hydrogen 1s state by the DEAR Collaboration that has challenged our theoretical understanding of this sector of strong interactions. We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements. The former class has not been previously discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Low energy \bar{K}N interactions are studied within Unitary Chiral Perturbation Theory at next-to-leading order with ten coupled channels. method 0.83 0.82 0.04 asserted 0.97
s1 We pay special attention to the recent precise determination of the strong shift and width of the kaonic hydrogen 1s state by the DEAR Collaboration that has challenged our theoretical understanding of this sector of strong interactions. background 0.92 0.06 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements. result 1.00 0.90 0.29 asserted 0.88
s3 The former class has not been previously discussed. gap 0.58 0.68 0.13 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.92 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Low energy \bar{K}N interactions are studied within Unitary Chiral Perturbation Theory at next-to-leading order with ten coupled channels. We pay special attention to the recent precise determination of the strong shift and width of the kaonic hydrogen 1s state by the DEAR Collaboration that has challenged our theoretical understanding of this sector of strong interactions. We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements. The former class has not been previously discussed.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 17 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States a conflicting result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 2 papers
  • The comparison enables one to immediately conclude that the scattering data, to which the parameters of Refs. [ref] are fitted, are, in general, not consistent with the DEAR data [ref] .

    Hadronic atoms in QCD + QED · Analysis of the DEAR data · contest 0.76

  • It has been puzzling that the energy shifts and decay widths, extracted from the scattering lengths derived in a number of chiral SU(3) based models [ref] , are inconsistent with the DEAR data of kaonic hydrogen.

    Kaonic hydrogen atom and kaon-proton scattering length · Introduction · contest 0.77

Uses its data or values 2 papers
Cites it as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.