Comment on "Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics"

B. Borasoy; R. Nissler; W. Weise

RECORD

Comment on "Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics"

B. Borasoy, R. Nissler, W. Weise

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 21 Dec 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this comment we demonstrate that the proposed solution violates fundamental principles of scattering theory.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,308 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

It has recently been claimed by Oller et al. [PRL 95 (2005) 172502] that the DEAR kaonic hydrogen data can be reconciled with K^- p scattering data in a chiral unitary approach. In this comment we demonstrate that the proposed solution violates fundamental principles of scattering theory.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	It has recently been claimed by Oller et al. [PRL 95 (2005) 172502] that the DEAR kaonic hydrogen data can be reconciled with K^- p scattering data in a chiral unitary approach.	background 1.00	0.03	0.05	asserted 0.83
s1	In this comment we demonstrate that the proposed solution violates fundamental principles of scattering theory.	result 0.50	0.90	0.93	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.55.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

It has recently been claimed by Oller et al. [PRL 95 (2005) 172502] that the DEAR kaonic hydrogen data can be reconciled with K^- p scattering data in a chiral unitary approach. In this comment we demonstrate that the proposed solution violates fundamental principles of scattering theory.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Finding Low Star Discrepancy 3D Kronecker Point Sets Using Algorithm Configuration Techniques
cs.NE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Optimizing the two Kronecker parameters with irace yields new state-of-the-art L∞ star discrepancy for 3D point sets of size at least 500 and for ranges of sizes.
On the Strangeness -1 S-wave Meson-Baryon Scattering
hep-ph 2006-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A next-to-leading-order chiral-unitary fit to 153 K-p scattering data plus kaonic hydrogen produces a preferred solution (fit I) that yields two Lambda(1405) poles and the observed S=-1 resonance spectrum.

How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States a conflicting result 2 papers

We typically find two classes of solutions, both of them reproducing previous data, that either can or cannot accommodate the DEAR measurements.

Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics · 0.99
We discuss why their arguments are irrelevant or do not hold.

Reply to Comment on "Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics" · 0.86

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

For a further discussion on this issue, we refer to Refs. [ref] .

Hadronic atoms in QCD + QED · Analysis of the DEAR data · 0.84

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.