Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0510122 v1 · submitted 10 Oct 2005

Two pole structure of the Lambda(1405) resonance

V.K. Magas, E. Oset, A. Ramos

The paper says

“The data of these two experiments, together with the present theoretical analysis, provides for the first time a clear experimental evidence of the two pole structure of the Lambda(1405).”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The K^- p –> pi^0 pi^0 Sigma^0 reaction is studied within a chiral unitary model. The distribution of pi^0 Sigma^0 states forming the Lambda(1405) shows, in agreement with a recent experiment, a peak at 1420 MeV and a relatively narrow width of 38 MeV. This reaction gives maximal possible weight to the second Lambda(1405) state found in chiral unitary theories, which is narrow and of higher energy than the nominal Lambda(1405). In contrast, the pi^- p –> K^0 pi Sigma reaction gives more weight to the pole at lower energy and with a larger width. The data of these two experiments, together with the present theoretical analysis, provides for the first time a clear experimental evidence of the two pole structure of the Lambda(1405).

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.83 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The K^- p --> pi^0 pi^0 Sigma^0 reaction is studied within a chiral unitary model. contribution 0.68 0.82 0.02 asserted 0.89
The distribution of pi^0 Sigma^0 states forming the Lambda(1405) shows, in agreement with a recent experiment, a peak at 1420 MeV and a relatively narrow width of 38 MeV. result 1.00 0.58 0.14 asserted 0.99
This reaction gives maximal possible weight to the second Lambda(1405) state found in chiral unitary theories, which is narrow and of higher energy than the nominal Lambda(1405). interpretation 0.83 0.46 0.22 asserted 1.00
In contrast, the pi^- p --> K^0 pi Sigma reaction gives more weight to the pole at lower energy and with a larger width. result 0.91 0.47 0.06 asserted 0.99
The data of these two experiments, together with the present theoretical analysis, provides for the first time a clear experimental evidence of the two pole structure of the Lambda(1405). interpretation 0.64 0.72 0.93 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.86 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.73

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,351 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 2 papers
States a conflicting result 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment