Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Charm and Bottom Quark Masses from Perturbative QCD

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 1 May 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using a new result for the first moment of the hadronic production cross section at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, and new data on the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ resonances for the charm quark, we determine the \msb masses of the charm and bottom quarks to be $\bar{m}_c(\bar{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$ GeV and $\bar{m}_b(\bar{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0605023 (version 3)
Pith IDWFTUWX4H, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM. Czakon, R. Boughezal, T. Schutzmeier. "Charm and Bottom Quark Masses from Perturbative QCD." arXiv:hep-ph/0605023 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/WFTUWX4H
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,386 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.82 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Using a new result for the first moment of the hadronic production cross section at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, and new data on the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ resonances for the charm quark, we determine the \msb masses of the charm and bottom quarks to be $\bar{m}_c(\bar{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$ GeV and $\bar{m}_b(\bar{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV. We assume that the continuum contribution to the sum rules is adequately described by pQCD. While we observe a large reduction of the perturbative error, the shifts induced by the theoretical input are very small. The main change in the central value of $m_c$ is related to the experimental data. On the other hand, the value of $m_b$ is not changed by our calculation to the assumed precision.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Using a new result for the first moment of the hadronic production cross section at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, and new data on the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ resonances for the charm quark, we determine the \msb masses of the charm and bottom quarks to be $\bar{m}_c(\bar{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$ GeV and $\bar{m}_b(\bar{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV. result 1.00 0.96 0.94 asserted 1.00
s1 We assume that the continuum contribution to the sum rules is adequately described by pQCD. method 0.80 0.40 0.02 asserted 0.50
s2 While we observe a large reduction of the perturbative error, the shifts induced by the theoretical input are very small. interpretation 0.80 0.89 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 The main change in the central value of $m_c$ is related to the experimental data. interpretation 0.94 0.89 0.10 asserted 1.00
s4 On the other hand, the value of $m_b$ is not changed by our calculation to the assumed precision. result 0.78 0.90 0.10 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.65 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Using a new result for the first moment of the hadronic production cross section at order ${\cal O}(\alpha_s^3)$, and new data on the $J/\psi$ and $\psi'$ resonances for the charm quark, we determine the \msb masses of the charm and bottom quarks to be $\bar{m}_c(\bar{m}_c) = 1.295 \pm 0.015$ GeV and $\bar{m}_b(\bar{m}_b) = 4.205 \pm 0.058$ GeV. We assume that the continuum contribution to the sum rules is adequately described by pQCD. While we observe a large reduction of the perturbative error, the shifts induced by the theoretical input are very small. The main change in the central value of $m_c$ is related to the experimental data. On the other hand, the value of $m_b$ is not changed by our calculation to the assumed precision.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

35 arXiv papers cite this in 52 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 41 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • The reduction of hundreds of integrals to master integrals has been achieved, originally for $C_0$ and $C_1$ [ref] , subsequently for $C_2$ and $C_3$, using the program Crusher [ref] .

    Massive Tadpoles: Techniques and Applications · SVZ sum rules, moments and tadpoles · 0.91

Uses its data or values 4 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
  • Combining in quadrature the three errors in the conversion we obtain for the $MS$ mass [equation] This value is in good agreement with the world average $m = 1.27^+0.07_-0.11$ [ref] but has a larger error than recent determinations using low-$n$ moments [ref] .

    The charm quark mass from non-relativistic sum rules · Results · 0.96

Cites it as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.