High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9303317 v3 · submitted 30 Mar 1993
On the electroweak phase transition in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
The paper says
“After including the full structure of the stop mass matrix, the most important experimental constraints and the leading plasma effects, we find that the present limits on Higgs and squark masses are still compatible with the scenario of electroweak baryogenesis, in a small region of parameter space corresponding to $m_h \simlt 70 \gev$ and $\msba \simlt 105 \gev$.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We study the finite-temperature effective potential of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, in the limit of only one light Higgs boson. Because of the large top Yukawa coupling, there can be significant differences with respect to the Standard Model case: for given values of the Higgs and top masses, little supersymmetry breaking in the stop sector can make the phase transition more strongly first-order. After including the full structure of the stop mass matrix, the most important experimental constraints and the leading plasma effects, we find that the present limits on Higgs and squark masses are still compatible with the scenario of electroweak baryogenesis, in a small region of parameter space corresponding to $m_h \simlt 70 \gev$ and $\msba \simlt 105 \gev$.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.90
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.60 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.43 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.79 · mentions code or data availability 0.01
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We study the finite-temperature effective potential of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, in the limit of only one light Higgs boson. | contribution 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.03 | asserted 0.78 |
| Because of the large top Yukawa coupling, there can be significant differences with respect to the Standard Model case: for given values of the Higgs and top masses, little supersymmetry breaking in the stop sector can make the phase transition more strongly first-order. | result 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.10 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
| After including the full structure of the stop mass matrix, the most important experimental constraints and the leading plasma effects, we find that the present limits on Higgs and squark masses are still compatible with the scenario of electroweak baryogenesis, in a small region of parameter space corresponding to $m_h \simlt 70 \gev$ and $\msba \simlt 105 \gev$. | result 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.86 | asserted 0.90 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.91 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.81
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v3
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,120 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 10 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Electroweak Baryogenesis in Non-minimal Composite Higgs Models hep-ph · Oct 2011
- Electroweak Phase Transition, Higgs Diphoton Rate, and New Heavy Fermions hep-ph · Nov 2012
- The Baryogenesis Window in the MSSM hep-ph · Sep 2008
- The Effective Theory of the Light Stop Scenario hep-ph · Jun 2008
- Four Generations, the Electroweak Phase Transition, and Supersymmetry hep-ph · Mar 2008
- Diphoton decays of stoponium at the Large Hadron Collider hep-ph · Dec 2007
- Do Stops Slow Down Electroweak Bubble Walls? hep-ph · Feb 2000
- An efficient approach to electroweak bubble velocities hep-ph · Feb 2013
- Quantum Transport and Electroweak Baryogenesis hep-ph · Feb 2013
- Primordial magnetogenesis astro-ph.CO · Jul 2010
How the literature uses it
13 arXiv papers cite this in 15 sentences
Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
However, the current experimental limit of $m_H$ is well above these values, at $m_H > 114$ GeV [ref] , thus turning the Standard Model an inadequate theory for baryogenesis.] Supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model have been the most intensively studied [ref] , but it is also possible to get a strong transition from more generic two-Higgs doublet models [ref] , from technicolor theories [ref] , etc.
Primordial magnetogenesis · Magnetogenesis in phase transitions · 0.81
Cites it as background 5 papers
-
The MSSM finite-temperature effective potential was calculated by several groups [ref] .
Beyond MSSM Baryogenesis · The scalar potential · 0.95
-
Detailed analyses for the case of the MSSM have been performed in Refs. [ref] .
BMSSM Implications for Cosmology · The EWPT in the BMSSM · 0.82
-
Weak scale supersymmetry has long been known to potentially enhance the strength of the electroweak phase transition and provide new sources of CP violation [ref] .
Electroweak Baryogenesis in R-symmetric Supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.85
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment