Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Particle Spectrum in Supersymmetric Models with a Gauge Singlet

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Ulrich Ellwanger, Michel Rausch de Traubenberg, Carlos A. Savoy

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 22 Jul 1993

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find a lower limit on the gluino mass of 160 GeV, upper limits on the lightest neutral scalar Higgs mass dependent on $m_{top}$ and the size of the soft supersymmetry breaking terms, and the possibility of a Higgs scalar as light as 10 GeV, but with reduced couplings to the Z boson.

how it is stated · asserted 0.93 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9307322 (version 1)
Pith IDTDNPEITG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCarlos A. Savoy, Michel Rausch de Traubenberg, Ulrich Ellwanger. "Particle Spectrum in Supersymmetric Models with a Gauge Singlet." arXiv:hep-ph/9307322 (1993). https://pith.science/paper/TDNPEITG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,150 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.53 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We scan the complete parameter space of the supersymmetric standard model extended by a gauge singlet, which is compatible with the following constraints: universal soft supersymmetry breaking terms at the GUT scale, finite running Yukawa couplings up to the GUT scale and present experimental bounds on all sparticles, Higgs scalar and top quark. The full radiative corrections to the Higgs potential due to the top/stop sector are included. We find a lower limit on the gluino mass of 160 GeV, upper limits on the lightest neutral scalar Higgs mass dependent on $m_{top}$ and the size of the soft supersymmetry breaking terms, and the possibility of a Higgs scalar as light as 10 GeV, but with reduced couplings to the Z boson.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We scan the complete parameter space of the supersymmetric standard model extended by a gauge singlet, which is compatible with the following constraints: universal soft supersymmetry breaking terms at the GUT scale, finite running Yukawa couplings up to the GUT scale and present experimental bounds on all sparticles, Higgs scalar and top quark. method 0.57 0.90 0.07 asserted 0.91
s1 The full radiative corrections to the Higgs potential due to the top/stop sector are included. method 0.96 0.89 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 We find a lower limit on the gluino mass of 160 GeV, upper limits on the lightest neutral scalar Higgs mass dependent on $m_{top}$ and the size of the soft supersymmetry breaking terms, and the possibility of a Higgs scalar as light as 10 GeV, but with reduced couplings to the Z boson. result 1.00 0.96 0.85 asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.77 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We scan the complete parameter space of the supersymmetric standard model extended by a gauge singlet, which is compatible with the following constraints: universal soft supersymmetry breaking terms at the GUT scale, finite running Yukawa couplings up to the GUT scale and present experimental bounds on all sparticles, Higgs scalar and top quark. The full radiative corrections to the Higgs potential due to the top/stop sector are included. We find a lower limit on the gluino mass of 160 GeV, upper limits on the lightest neutral scalar Higgs mass dependent on $m_{top}$ and the size of the soft supersymmetry breaking terms, and the possibility of a Higgs scalar as light as 10 GeV, but with reduced couplings to the Z boson.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

51 arXiv papers cite this in 70 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 32 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Clearly, even very light CP-even scalars are not ruled out if $ξ_1$ is sufficiently small, and such scenarios can indeed be realised within the NMSSM [ref] .

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model · LEP and $e^+ e^-$ colliders · 0.99

Cites it as background 34 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.