Quark-Lepton Unification and Rare Meson Decays

G. Valencia; S. Willenbrock

REVIEW

Quark-Lepton Unification and Rare Meson Decays

G. Valencia, S. Willenbrock

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 1 Sep 1994 · 31 references

Pith's verdict: A clean, standard bounds paper: the six-permutation table and the tau-first-generation K and B bounds are the real contribution, and the flagged coupling-matching worry mostly dissolves once you do the fourth-root arithmetic.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/9409201 (version 1)

Pith IDH3TTGE4U, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationG. Valencia, S. Willenbrock. "Quark-Lepton Unification and Rare Meson Decays." arXiv:hep-ph/9409201 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/H3TTGE4U

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Worth your time if you work on leptoquarks or extended technicolor; skip it otherwise. It's a 1994 bounds paper and it does exactly what it says on the tin, competently, without overreach. The abstract's claim [abstract:s2] that the sensitive probes shift with the generation assignment is the actual content, and it holds up. The genuinely new pieces are the K+ to e+nu bound (130 TeV, Eq. 43) and the B+ to e+nu bound (13 TeV, Eq. 37) in the tau-first-generation scenarios, plus the systematic six-permutation Table 1. The KL to mu-e and pi to e-nu numbers are updates, and the authors say up front that they overlap with Ref. [2] and agree. That's the right way to handle it. The effective-operator matching is textbook and I checked Eq. (8) against the coefficient in Eq. (3) and the matrix element in Eq. (5); it reproduces. The choice of high light-quark masses is explicitly justified as conservative, which is the honest direction to err. On the stress-test concern: the worry is that g_4(M_c) = g_s(M_c) and the no-extra-colored-matter running are asserted, not derived. True, and the paper says so below Eq. (8). But the stress test's own arithmetic answers it: alpha_s enters under a fourth root in the width-to-mass inversion, so a factor of two in alpha_s(M_c) moves M_c by roughly 19%. The 1400 TeV is an order-of-magnitude floor, not a precision number, and it is robust at that level. The reader's 'alpha_s^{1/2}' is loose but the direction is right. So this is a stated assumption with a benign consequence, not a load-bearing flaw. What I would actually ask for is a sentence saying so, since a reader can't tell from the text. The real slips are small: Eq. (18) doesn't balance dimensionally, and Eq. (19) drops the (1 - m_e/m_pi)^2 phase-space factor that Eq. (33) keeps for the muon channel. Both touch the pi to e nu bound at the few-percent level and leave the headline KL number alone. The 10^-9 projections in Table 1 are speculative but flagged as such in parentheses. Send it to referees; the fixes are a paragraph and two equations.

Referee report

Major objections (4)

[Section 3, Eq. (18)] The displayed equation is dimensionally inconsistent: the right-hand side has B_0 in the denominator, giving dimensions of E^{-1} rather than E^{+1} for a width. Comparing with Eq. (32), where B_0 appears in the numerator, suggests that B_0 should be in the numerator in Eq. (18) as well. Since Eq. (18) underlies the 250 TeV bound in Eq. (20) and the corresponding entry in Table 1, please correct the equation and confirm that the numerical bound is unchanged.
[Section 5, below Eq. (41)] The text states that the Pati-Salam decay is K+→e+ν_τ and that it does not interfere with the weak decay because the neutrinos are different types. In the stated scenario (electron associated with the second generation), the second-generation lepton doublet is (ν_e, e), so the Pati-Salam boson should produce ν_e, not ν_τ. If so, the amplitudes do interfere, and the bound Eq. (43) (130 TeV) needs to be recomputed. Please clarify the association or correct the neutrino flavor.
[Section 5, Eq. (43)] Please provide the intermediate numerical inputs (α_s(M_c), B_0, and the allowed fractional deviation δ) used to obtain M_c > 130 TeV. A rough check with α_s(M_c) ≈ 0.04 and the central values in Eqs. (39)-(40) gives a smaller bound, so the derivation should be documented.
[Table 1] The table as printed is not legible: the number of entries per row varies and does not match the nine columns, so the reader cannot tell which bound belongs to which decay. Please check the column alignment and ensure that each row has nine entries.

Minor objections (6)

[Section 2] The claim that the model is free of gauge and mixed gravitational anomalies should be verified. The fermion content appears to be three 4's of SU(4) per generation, which would give a nonzero SU(4)^3 anomaly unless additional fermions or a 4̄ are present.
[Section 3, below Eq. (8)] The paper states that extra colored particles between m_t and M_c would increase α_s(M_c) and increase the lower bound, but does not quantify the sensitivity. Since the pure Pati-Salam width scales as α_s^2/M_c^4, the bound scales as M_c ∝ α_s(M_c)^{1/2}; a factor-of-two change in α_s(M_c) shifts M_c by about 40%. A brief statement would help the reader judge the robustness of the quoted numbers.
[Reference [28]] The bound Eq. (30) and the derived Eq. (31) rely on a preprint (CLNS-94-1287). Please confirm the number against the published version if available.
[Eqs. (18) and (32)] The factor V_ud appears in the denominator, but the interference term should be proportional to V_ud (or 1/|V_ud| in the ratio). Please check the normalization.
[Section 3] The choice m_d = 7.7 MeV and m_s = 125 MeV at 1 GeV is on the high side; a brief justification would help, since these values enter B_0 and thus the bounds.
[Eq. (1)] The combination of the Brookhaven E791 bound with previous experiments should be stated explicitly.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Rare meson decays place a 1,400 TeV lower bound on quark-lepton unification.

The reading

The paper asks whether the heavy gauge bosons that would exist if quarks and leptons share one unified gauge symmetry leave a footprint in rare meson decays. It treats the tau, muon, and electron as possibly tied to the first, second, or third quark generation in all six assignments, computes the decay rate induced by exchanging the heavy boson, and compares it with experimental limits. The strongest current bound comes from $K_L→μ^±e^∓$, which pushes the boson mass above $1{,}400$ TeV; when the tau is tied to first-generation quarks, $K^+→e^+ν$ and $B^+→e^+ν$ become the best probes. If the logic is right, low-energy meson physics reaches unification scales far beyond direct collider access.

What carries the argument

The calculation turns the exchange of a heavy $SU(4)_c$ gauge boson into a four-fermion contact interaction between quarks and leptons. After a Fierz rearrangement, the hadronic side is reduced to decay constants and the ratio $B_0=m_K^2/(m_s+m_d)$, with quark masses run from the high scale down to low energy by leading-log QCD. The leptonic and hadronic pieces are then combined into branching ratios, or into lepton-universality ratios such as $R_{e/μ}=Γ(π^+→e^+ν)/Γ(π^+→μ^+ν)$, and compared with experiment. The same contact-interaction template is reused across $K$, $π$, and $B$ channels, which is what makes the generation-by-generation comparison possible.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that rare meson decays mediated by the heavy gauge bosons of quark-lepton unification give lower bounds on the boson mass $M_c$, and that the best channel depends on which lepton is associated with which quark generation. The paper's new feature is that it does not assume the tau is tied to the third generation; it works through all six lepton-quark assignments. In the tau-third scenario, the updated limit on $K_L→μ^±e^∓$ yields $M_c>1{,}400$ TeV. In the two tau-first scenarios, the best current bounds come from lepton universality in $K^+→e^+ν$ ($M_c>130$ TeV) and from $B^+→e^+ν$ ($M_c>13$ TeV). The paper also projects that $B^0_d,B^0_s→μ^±e^∓$ at the $10^{-9}$ level could reach about $140$ TeV and become the leading probe in three assignments.

Load-bearing premise

The bounds assume that the unified gauge coupling at the heavy-boson scale equals the strong coupling there and that no extra colored particles change its running between the top mass and that scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the calculation is correct, quark-lepton unification with a Pati-Salam boson below about $1{,}400$ TeV is excluded when the tau is tied to the third quark generation.
In the tau-first assignments, improved measurements of $K^+→e^+ν$ and $B^+→e^+ν$ can raise the current bounds of $130$ TeV and $13$ TeV.
A hadron-collider search for $B^0_d,B^0_s→μ^±e^∓$ reaching $10^{-9}$ could set a bound near $140$ TeV and become the best probe in three of the six assignments.
Lepton-universality tests in charged pion and kaon decays provide correlated null tests: a deviation in one channel would point to a specific lepton-quark assignment and predict related signals in the others.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same contact-interaction bookkeeping applies to any heavy non-chiral leptoquark with an $SU(4)$-like coupling, so the quoted numbers can be read as a template for translating rare-decay limits into mass reach beyond this specific model.
If $B^0_{d,s}→μ^±e^∓$ reaches the $10^{-9}$ level, bottom-meson physics may overtake kaon physics as the primary discovery channel for quark-lepton unification in several generation assignments.
A global fit across all six assignments and all channels would turn the paper's one-at-a-time bounds into a consistency test; correlated deviations would be more informative than any single decay.
Relaxing the equality between the unified and strong couplings at the high scale would weaken the mass bounds roughly in proportion to the coupling, so a UV completion with a smaller unified coupling would lower the reach quoted here.

Original abstract

We study meson decays mediated by the heavy gauge bosons of the Pati-Salam model of quark-lepton unification. We consider the scenarios in which the tau lepton is associated with the third, second, and first generation of quarks. The most sensitive probes, depending on the scenario, are rare K, pi, and B decays.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,881 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We study meson decays mediated by the heavy gauge bosons of the Pati-Salam model of quark-lepton unification. We consider the scenarios in which the tau lepton is associated with the third, second, and first generation of quarks. The most sensitive probes, depending on the scenario, are rare K, pi, and B decays.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We study meson decays mediated by the heavy gauge bosons of the Pati-Salam model of quark-lepton unification.	contribution 0.99	0.87	0.05	asserted 0.85
s1	We consider the scenarios in which the tau lepton is associated with the third, second, and first generation of quarks.	contribution 0.67	0.60	0.03	asserted 0.67
s2	The most sensitive probes, depending on the scenario, are rare K, pi, and B decays.	result 0.80	0.55	0.30	asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.54.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (31)

[2]

A. Kuznetsov and N. Mikheev, Phys. Lett. B329, 295 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[1]

J. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974)

View on Pith 1974
[3]

M. Leurer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1324 (1993); Phys. Rev. D 49, 333 (1994)

View on Pith 1993
[4]

M. Leurer, Phys. Rev. D 50, 536 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[5]

S. Davidson, D. Bailey, and B. Campbell, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[6]

P. Langacker, Phys. Rep. 72, 185 (1981)

View on Pith 1981
[7]

H. Georgi, in Particles and Fields 1974, ed. C. Carlson (AIP, NY, 1975), p. 575

View on Pith 1974
[8]

H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. 93, 193 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[9]

N. Deshpande, E. Keith, and P. Pal, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2261 (1992); 47, 2892 (1993)

View on Pith 1992
[10]

E. Eichten and K. Lane, Phys. Lett. 90B, 125 (1980)

View on Pith 1980
[11]

S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and P. Sikivie, Nucl. Phys. B176, 449 (1980); S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and G. Kane, Nucl. Phys. B182, 77 (1981)

View on Pith 1980
[12]

J. Lykken and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4902 (1994), and references therein

View on Pith 1994
[13]

T. Appelquist and J. Terning, YCTP-P21-93

View on Pith
[14]

CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al. , Phys. Rev. D 50, 2966 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[15]

S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and G. Kane, Ref. [11]

View on Pith
[16]

O. Shanker, Nucl. Phys. B206, 253 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[17]

N. Deshpande and R. Johnson, Phy. Rev. D 27, 1193 (1983)

View on Pith 1983
[18]

K. Arisaka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1049 (1993). 16

View on Pith 1993
[19]

J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)

View on Pith 1992
[20]

S. Weinberg, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 38, 185 (1977)

View on Pith 1977
[21]

A. Ukawa, in Lattice 92, Proceedings of the International Symposium on L attice Field Theory, Amsterdam, 1992, edited by J. Smit and P. van Baal, Nucl. Phys. B ( Proc. Suppl.) 30, 3 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[22]

CLEO Collaboration, R. Ammar et al. , Phys. Rev. D 49, 5701 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[23]

D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2138 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[24]

O. Shanker, Nucl. Phys. B204, 375 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[25]

W. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3629 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[26]

D. Britton et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3000 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[27]

C. Czapek et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 17 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[28]

CLEO Collaboration, J. Bartelt el al. , CLNS-94-1287 (1994)

View on Pith 1994
[29]

CLEO Collaboration, D. Cinabro, Proceedings of the Fermilab Meeting, Division of Particles and Fields 1992 , edited by C. Albright, P. Kasper, R. Raja, and J. Yoh (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1993), p. 843

View on Pith 1992
[30]

T. Goldman and W. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 15, 709 (1977); J. Bijnens, G. Ecker, and J. Gasser, Nucl. Phys. B396, 81 (1993)

View on Pith 1977
[31]

J. Heintze, Phys. Lett. 60B, 302 (1976). 17 Figure Captions Fig. 1 - Diagram for K 0 → µ−e+, mediated by a heavy Pati-Salam boson. 18 This figure "fig1-1.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/hep-ph/9409201v1

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1976

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Asymptotic grand unification in SO(10) with one extra dimension
hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A 5D SO(10) model with a 10, 120, and 16 Higgs can make gauge couplings asymptotically safe and Yukawa couplings asymptotically free, but only with an exact matching condition at the compactification scale.
Matter Unification and Lepton Flavour Violation
hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Muon-to-electron conversion at Mu2e can probe quark–lepton unification scales up to ~10^4 TeV in the minimal SU(4)_C×SU(2)_L×U(1)_R model, even where rare kaon decays are suppressed by unknown mixing angles.
TeV Scale Quark-Lepton Unification
hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

A quark-lepton unified Pati-Salam model with Z2 symmetry realizes a leptoquark gauge boson as light as 4.3 TeV, compatible with LHC and flavor constraints, and predicts testable lepton flavor violation plus new vector...
Left-Right SU(4) Vector Leptoquark Model for Flavor Anomalies
hep-ph 2018-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A left-right SU(4) Pati-Salam model with SU(4)_R broken at a high scale keeps the (3,1)_{2/3} vector leptoquark as light as 10 TeV, explaining the R_K and R_K* anomalies while evading lepton-flavor-violation bounds.
Pati-Salam explanations of the B-meson anomalies
hep-ph 2018-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Two scalar leptoquarks in a parity-symmetric Pati-Salam model fit both the R_K and R_D B-meson anomalies with chi-squared near 2.4, requiring a sub-100 MeV right-handed neutrino and additional UV structure.

Show 16 more citing papers

Post-Sphaleron Baryogenesis and an Upper Limit on the Neutron-Antineutron Oscillation Time
hep-ph 2013-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The requirement that a post-sphaleron baryogenesis model reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry, together with flavor-changing constraints on color-sextet scalars, implies the neutron-antineutron oscillation time is ...
Quark-Lepton Unification Signatures
hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In the minimal low-scale quark-lepton unification model, scalar leptoquarks decay mainly to third-generation quarks and leptons, and current LHC measurements exclude masses below roughly 1.0–1.15 TeV in the y2=0 benchmark.
Flavor Non-universal Pati-Salam Unification and Neutrino Masses
hep-ph 2020-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Site-localized singlet fermions with hierarchical Majorana masses yield anarchic light neutrino masses in a three-site Pati-Salam model, with a warped five-dimensional interpretation.
Gravitational Imprints of Flavor Hierarchies
hep-ph 2019-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Sequential symmetry breakings that generate the quark and lepton mass hierarchy can produce a multi-peaked gravitational wave signal detectable by near-future observatories, illustrated in the PS^3 model.
A unified leptoquark model confronted with lepton non-universality in $B$-meson decays
hep-ph 2018-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

In a complete SU(4)xSU(2)xU(1) leptoquark model, the K_L to e-plus-minus-mu-minus-plus constraint excludes the parameter space needed to explain the R_K and R_K* B-meson anomalies.
Third Family Quark-Lepton Unification at the TeV Scale
hep-ph 2018-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A renormalizable SU(4)-based model unifies third-family quarks and leptons near the TeV scale and links the B-meson anomalies to observable PMNS non-unitarity.
$B$ Meson Anomalies in a Pati-Salam Model within the Randall-Sundrum Background
hep-ph 2018-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Pati-Salam model in a Randall-Sundrum background gives a 3 TeV vector leptoquark that fits the b to s mu mu anomalies, but D-Dbar mixing and tau to 3 mu cap the b to c tau nu effect below the measured R(D) and R(D*).
A model of vector leptoquarks in view of the $B$-physics anomalies
hep-ph 2017-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Pati-Salam model with vector-like fermions permits TeV-scale symmetry breaking and a vector leptoquark that can accommodate the R(D), R(D*) and b to s lepton-pair anomalies while predicting enhanced B_s to tau tau a...
Baryon Number and Lepton Universality Violation in Leptoquark and Diquark Models
hep-ph 2017-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Only two leptoquark representations survive both proton-decay constraints and the B-meson anomaly fit, and the (3,1) vector leptoquark points to Pati-Salam unification.
Predictive Pati-Salam theory of fermion masses and mixing
hep-ph 2017-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A Δ(27)-flavored Pati-Salam model predicts, for normal neutrino mass ordering, that the atmospheric angle lies in the higher octant and CP is violated, with a lower bound on neutrinoless double beta decay.
Multi-component Fermionic Dark Matter and IceCube PeV scale Neutrinos in Left-Right Model with Gauge Unification
hep-ph 2017-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A PeV-scale right-handed fermion triplet decaying to a TeV triplet plus neutrinos can fit the IceCube PeV events, with its over-abundant thermal relic diluted by late scalar decay and the spectrum embedded in SO(10).
Massive vectors and loop observables: the $g-2$ case
hep-ph 2016-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Embedding a single new massive vector into a spontaneously broken gauge symmetry rules out every non-abelian explanation of the muon g-2 anomaly, because the required gauge structure brings collider and flavor bounds ...
Low Scale Quark-Lepton Unification
hep-ph 2013-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A SU(4)_C x SU(2)_L x U(1)_R model unifies quarks and leptons at a scale near 1000 TeV and predicts TeV-scale scalar leptoquarks, with neutrino masses from an inverse seesaw.
Searches for Baryon Number Violation in Neutrino Experiments: A White Paper
hep-ex 2022-03 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Next-generation neutrino detectors (Hyper-K, DUNE, JUNO, THEIA) are projected to improve proton lifetime limits by up to two orders of magnitude, reaching lifetimes predicted by a broad class of Grand Unified Theories.
Lepton non-universality in $B$-decays in the minimal leptoquark gauge model
hep-ph 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

Review of the room left for B-decay anomalies inside the minimal low-energy leptoquark gauge model with SU(4)_C ⊗ SU(2)_L ⊗ U(1)_R symmetry.
Constraints on New Physics from $B$ mesons
hep-ph 2019-08 unverdicted

A 2019 review of B meson and kaon physics anomalies, summarizing the evidence for lepton flavor universality violation and tensions in mixing and CP violation, and assessing new physics explanations.

How the literature uses it

47 arXiv papers cite this in 71 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 50 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper

Needless to say, both analyses [ref] and [ref] are outdated nowadays due to new experimental data.

All possible first signals of gauge leptoquark in quark-lepton unification and beyond · Literature overview · contest 0.87

Builds on it 1 paper

The calculations in App. [ref] update and extend previous results [ref] .

Left-Right SU(4) Vector Leptoquark Model for Flavor Anomalies · Introduction · 0.99

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

For the decay of a scalar to two fermions the sum over helicity states is given by [equation] where [equation] The matrix elements of the axial and pseudoscalar currents for the relevant mesons are given by [ref] [equation] where $f_M_pq$ is the meson's decay constant and $m_pq = m^2_M_pq/(m_q_p+m_q_q)$.

Lowering the scale of Pati-Salam breaking through seesaw mixing · Neutral Pseudoscalar meson decays induced by $X_μ$ · 0.81

Uses its data or values 2 papers

In particular $K^0_L →μ^± e^∓$ constraint requires $M_X ≳𝒪(2500)$ TeV [ref] .

TeV Scale Quark-Lepton Unification · Introduction · 0.82
Finally, the dashed (blue) curve corresponds to the lower bound $m_X ≳[2000]TeV$ of [ref] , which could, however, be reduced.

SO(10) paths to dark matter · Co-annihilation and chemical equilibrium · 0.89

Compares with it 3 papers

Maximising the leptoquark's contribution to $K_L^0 →μe$ as in <ref> leads to limits on the gauge leptoquark mass of roughly $2500$ TeV, similar to previous studies [ref] .

Lowering the scale of Pati-Salam breaking through seesaw mixing · Neutral Pseudoscalar meson decays induced by $X_μ$ · 0.98
A similar model can be found in Refs. [ref] , but without the needed mechanism for neutrino masses that allow us to have a realistic theory at the low scale.

Matter Unification and Lepton Flavour Violation · MATTER UNIFICATION · 0.93
For comparison, the lower bound on the $SU(4)_c ×SU(2)_L ×SU(2)_R$ [ref] symmetry breaking is around $10^3$ TeV [ref] .

Monopoles, Exotic states and Muon $g-2$ in TeV scale Trinification · Introduction · 0.92

Cites it as support 1 paper

For generic, order one entries of the flavor matrices, the leptoquark mass is forced to be above the $1000 TeV$ scale [ref] .

Baryon Number and Lepton Universality Violation in Leptoquark and Diquark Models · Towards a viable UV completion · 0.97

Cites it as background 9 papers

This kind of semileptonic $τ$ transition has been addressed extensively in the past [ref] , besides its strangeness-conserving counterpart [ref] , under various NP contexts.

Lepton-flavor-violating semileptonic $\tau$ decay and $K\to\pi\nu\bar\nu$ · Introduction · 0.99
Such processes have been studied previously in Refs. [ref] .

Matter Unification and Lepton Flavour Violation · INTRODUCTION · 0.89
In 1994, Valencia and Willenbrock [ref] considered the cases where $=$ are permutation matrices, i.e. where each lepton is coupled to a single quark, and studied various two-body meson and tau decays.

All possible first signals of gauge leptoquark in quark-lepton unification and beyond · Literature overview · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [2]

A. Kuznetsov and N. Mikheev, Phys. Lett. B329, 295 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[2] [1]

J. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974)

View on Pith 1974

[3] [3]

M. Leurer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1324 (1993); Phys. Rev. D 49, 333 (1994)

View on Pith 1993

[4] [4]

M. Leurer, Phys. Rev. D 50, 536 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[5] [5]

S. Davidson, D. Bailey, and B. Campbell, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[6] [6]

P. Langacker, Phys. Rep. 72, 185 (1981)

View on Pith 1981

[7] [7]

H. Georgi, in Particles and Fields 1974, ed. C. Carlson (AIP, NY, 1975), p. 575

View on Pith 1974

[8] [8]

H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. 93, 193 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[9] [9]

N. Deshpande, E. Keith, and P. Pal, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2261 (1992); 47, 2892 (1993)

View on Pith 1992

[10] [10]

E. Eichten and K. Lane, Phys. Lett. 90B, 125 (1980)

View on Pith 1980

[11] [11]

S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and P. Sikivie, Nucl. Phys. B176, 449 (1980); S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and G. Kane, Nucl. Phys. B182, 77 (1981)

View on Pith 1980

[12] [12]

J. Lykken and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4902 (1994), and references therein

View on Pith 1994

[13] [13]

T. Appelquist and J. Terning, YCTP-P21-93

View on Pith

[14] [14]

CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al. , Phys. Rev. D 50, 2966 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[15] [15]

S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and G. Kane, Ref. [11]

View on Pith

[16] [16]

O. Shanker, Nucl. Phys. B206, 253 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[17] [17]

N. Deshpande and R. Johnson, Phy. Rev. D 27, 1193 (1983)

View on Pith 1983

[18] [18]

K. Arisaka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1049 (1993). 16

View on Pith 1993

[19] [19]

J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)

View on Pith 1992

[20] [20]

S. Weinberg, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 38, 185 (1977)

View on Pith 1977

[21] [21]

A. Ukawa, in Lattice 92, Proceedings of the International Symposium on L attice Field Theory, Amsterdam, 1992, edited by J. Smit and P. van Baal, Nucl. Phys. B ( Proc. Suppl.) 30, 3 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[22] [22]

CLEO Collaboration, R. Ammar et al. , Phys. Rev. D 49, 5701 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[23] [23]

D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2138 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[24] [24]

O. Shanker, Nucl. Phys. B204, 375 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[25] [25]

W. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3629 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[26] [26]

D. Britton et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3000 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[27] [27]

C. Czapek et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 17 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[28] [28]

CLEO Collaboration, J. Bartelt el al. , CLNS-94-1287 (1994)

View on Pith 1994

[29] [29]

CLEO Collaboration, D. Cinabro, Proceedings of the Fermilab Meeting, Division of Particles and Fields 1992 , edited by C. Albright, P. Kasper, R. Raja, and J. Yoh (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 1993), p. 843

View on Pith 1992

[30] [30]

T. Goldman and W. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 15, 709 (1977); J. Bijnens, G. Ecker, and J. Gasser, Nucl. Phys. B396, 81 (1993)

View on Pith 1977

[31] [31]

J. Heintze, Phys. Lett. 60B, 302 (1976). 17 Figure Captions Fig. 1 - Diagram for K 0 → µ−e+, mediated by a heavy Pati-Salam boson. 18 This figure "fig1-1.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org/ps/hep-ph/9409201v1

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1976