Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9608472 v1 · submitted 28 Aug 1996

Higher Order Top Squark Decays

W. Porod, T. Wöhrmann

The paper says

“We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Tevatron, the LHC and a 500 GeV e+e− Linear Collider.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark into a b-quark, a W-boson and the lightest neutralino and compare this decay with the flavour changing two body decay of the lighter top squark into a c-quark and the lightest neutralino. We do this for scenarios where two body decays at tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. We give the complete analysis for the three body and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Tevatron, the LHC and a 500 GeV e+e− Linear Collider.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.58

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.41 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.42 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model we study the three body decay of the lighter top squark into a b-quark, a W-boson and the lightest neutralino and compare this decay with the flavour changing two body decay of the lighter top squark into a c-quark and the lightest neutralino. contribution 1.00 0.92 0.11 asserted 0.95
We do this for scenarios where two body decays at tree level are forbidden for the light top squark. method 0.56 0.44 0.03 asserted 0.77
We give the complete analysis for the three body and compare it with the mentioned two body decay. contribution 0.90 0.93 0.07 asserted 0.95
We discuss our numerical results in view of the upgraded Tevatron, the LHC and a 500~GeV $e^+ e^-$ Linear Collider. interpretation 0.86 0.68 0.06 asserted 0.58

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.71 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.91

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,670 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 3 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • We extend and refine former analyses [ref] by including the recently computed SUSY-QCD corrections to the FV two-body decay [ref] [See also [ref] .] and the FV tree-level couplings in the three-body decay as well as in the four-body decay where also a non-vanishing $τ$ and bottom mass in the final state [ref] are taken into account.

    Light stop decays into $W b \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ near the kinematic threshold · Introduction · 0.98

Cites it as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment