Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Unification Bounds on the Possible N=2 Supersymmetry Breaking Scale

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 Jan 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Introducing mirror particles for all the gauge and matter multiplets of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), the measured values of sin^2 \theta_W and \alpha_3(M_Z) indicate that the N=2 threshold scale M_{S_2} cannot be lower than \sim 10^{14}GeV.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.70 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9701292 (version 1)
Pith IDA7G6CCI5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationG.K. Leontaris, I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis. "Unification Bounds on the Possible N=2 Supersymmetry Breaking Scale." arXiv:hep-ph/9701292 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/A7G6CCI5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,803 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.57 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this letter, the possible appearance of N=2 supersymmetry at a low energy scale is investigated in the context of unified theories. Introducing mirror particles for all the gauge and matter multiplets of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), the measured values of sin^2 \theta_W and \alpha_3(M_Z) indicate that the N=2 threshold scale M_{S_2} cannot be lower than \sim 10^{14}GeV. If the U(1) normalization coefficient k is treated as a free parameter, M_{S_2} can be as low as 10^9 GeV. On the other hand, if mirror quarks and leptons are absent and a non-standard value for k is used, N=2 supersymmetry breaking could in principle occur at the electroweak scale.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this letter, the possible appearance of N=2 supersymmetry at a low energy scale is investigated in the context of unified theories. contribution 0.79 0.70 0.04 unclear 0.62
s1 Introducing mirror particles for all the gauge and matter multiplets of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), the measured values of sin^2 \theta_W and \alpha_3(M_Z) indicate that the N=2 threshold scale M_{S_2} cannot be lower than \sim 10^{14}GeV. result 0.98 0.72 0.63 hedged possibility 0.70
s2 If the U(1) normalization coefficient k is treated as a free parameter, M_{S_2} can be as low as 10^9 GeV. result 1.00 0.74 0.15 hedged possibility 0.87
s3 On the other hand, if mirror quarks and leptons are absent and a non-standard value for k is used, N=2 supersymmetry breaking could in principle occur at the electroweak scale. result 0.93 0.35 0.10 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.68.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this letter, the possible appearance of N=2 supersymmetry at a low energy scale is investigated in the context of unified theories. Introducing mirror particles for all the gauge and matter multiplets of the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM), the measured values of sin^2 \theta_W and \alpha_3(M_Z) indicate that the N=2 threshold scale M_{S_2} cannot be lower than \sim 10^{14}GeV. If the U(1) normalization coefficient k is treated as a free parameter, M_{S_2} can be as low as 10^9 GeV. On the other hand, if mirror quarks and leptons are absent and a non-standard value for k is used, N=2 supersymmetry breaking could in principle occur at the electroweak scale.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 2 papers
  • For a (surely incomplete) list of related literature, see Ref. [ref] .] In particular, multiple gravitinos seem most compelling as an evidence of extended SUSY, since the presence of the other mirror partners might look like mere presence of extra matter multiplets observationally.

    Nonlinearly Realized Extended Supergravity · Introduction · 0.96

  • Possible solutions to this problem would be to add fields to the theory so that the new fields fall in complete GUT multiplets [ref] , or to allow a different normalization for U(1)$_Y$ [ref] , or to contemplate different unification patterns [ref] , etc.

    Color-Octet Scalars of N=2 Supersymmetry at the LHC · THEORETICAL BASIS: GAUGE HYPER-MULTIPLETS AND SCALARS · 0.91

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.