Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9703351 v5 · submitted 18 Mar 1997

CP Violation and Matter Effect in Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Jiro Arafune, Masafumi Koike, Joe Sato

The paper says

“We show simple methods how to separate pure CP violating effect from matter effect in long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with three generations of neutrinos.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We show simple methods how to separate pure CP violating effect from matter effect in long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with three generations of neutrinos. We give compact formulae for neutrino oscillation probabilities assuming one of the three neutrino masses (presumably tau-neutrino mass) to be much larger than the other masses and the effective mass due to matter effect. Two methods are shown: One is to observe envelopes of the curves of oscillation probabilities as functions of neutrino energy; a merit of this method is that only a single detector is enough to determine the presence of CP violation. The other is to compare experiments with at least two different baseline lengths; this has a merit that it needs only narrow energy range of oscillation data.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v5). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We show simple methods how to separate pure CP violating effect from matter effect in long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with three generations of neutrinos. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.67 asserted 1.00
We give compact formulae for neutrino oscillation probabilities assuming one of the three neutrino masses (presumably tau-neutrino mass) to be much larger than the other masses and the effective mass due to matter effect. contribution 0.56 0.90 0.10 asserted 0.84
Two methods are shown: One is to observe envelopes of the curves of oscillation probabilities as functions of neutrino energy; a merit of this method is that only a single detector is enough to determine the presence of CP violation. method 0.95 0.86 0.20 asserted 1.00
The other is to compare experiments with at least two different baseline lengths; this has a merit that it needs only narrow energy range of oscillation data. method 0.93 0.73 0.08 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v5

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,716 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter hep-ph · May 2015
  2. Standard versus Non-Standard CP Phases in Neutrino Oscillation in Matter with Non-Unitarity hep-ph · Jun 2018
  3. Perturbation Theory of Neutrino Oscillation with Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions hep-ph · Sep 2008
  4. Non-standard neutrino interactions in reactor and superbeam experiments hep-ph · Aug 2007
  5. Resolving Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and CP Degeneracy by Two Identical Detectors with Different Baselines hep-ph · Apr 2005
  6. Series expansions for three-flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter hep-ph · Feb 2004
  7. Precise Measurement of $\delta$ at LBL Experiments Using Only The Neutrino Sector hep-ph · Aug 2026
  8. Impact of Improved Energy Resolution on DUNE sensitivity to Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions hep-ph · Jun 2021
  9. Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report physics.ins-det · May 2018
  10. Non-standard interactions spoiling the CP violation sensitivity at DUNE and other long baseline experiments hep-ph · Mar 2016
  11. Probing CP violation signal at DUNE in presence of non-standard neutrino interactions hep-ph · Oct 2015
  12. A Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Using J-PARC Neutrino Beam and Hyper-Kamiokande physics.ins-det · Dec 2014
  13. The mass-hierarchy and CP-violation discovery reach of the LBNO long-baseline neutrino experiment hep-ph · Dec 2013
  14. Large-Theta(13) Perturbation Theory of Neutrino Oscillation for Long-Baseline Experiments hep-ph · Mar 2011
  15. Analytical Approximation of the Neutrino Oscillation Matter Effects at large $\theta_{13}$ hep-ph · Feb 2013
  16. CP Violation and Neutrino Oscillations hep-ph · Oct 2007
  17. Status and Perspectives of Neutrino Physics hep-ph · Nov 2021
How the literature uses it

28 arXiv papers cite this in 40 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 24 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 5 papers
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as background 8 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment