Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Reconciling Supersymmetry and Left-Right Symmetry

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 26 Mar 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We construct the minimal supersymmetric left-right theory and show that at the renormalizable level it requires the existence of an intermediate $B-L$ breaking scale.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9703434 (version 1)
Pith IDFP5VYVY7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.S. Aulakh, G. Senjanovic, K. Benakli. "Reconciling Supersymmetry and Left-Right Symmetry." arXiv:hep-ph/9703434 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/FP5VYVY7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,544 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We construct the minimal supersymmetric left-right theory and show that at the renormalizable level it requires the existence of an intermediate $B-L$ breaking scale. The subsequent symmetry breaking down to MSSM automatically preserves R-symmetry. Furthermore, unlike in the nonsupersymmetric version of the theory, the see-saw mechanism takes its canonical form. The theory predicts the existence of a triplet of Higgs scalars much lighter than the $B-L$ breaking scale.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We construct the minimal supersymmetric left-right theory and show that at the renormalizable level it requires the existence of an intermediate $B-L$ breaking scale. contribution 0.83 0.95 0.61 asserted 1.00
s1 The subsequent symmetry breaking down to MSSM automatically preserves R-symmetry. result 0.99 0.82 0.13 asserted 1.00
s2 Furthermore, unlike in the nonsupersymmetric version of the theory, the see-saw mechanism takes its canonical form. result 0.97 0.68 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 The theory predicts the existence of a triplet of Higgs scalars much lighter than the $B-L$ breaking scale. result 1.00 0.84 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We construct the minimal supersymmetric left-right theory and show that at the renormalizable level it requires the existence of an intermediate $B-L$ breaking scale. The subsequent symmetry breaking down to MSSM automatically preserves R-symmetry. Furthermore, unlike in the nonsupersymmetric version of the theory, the see-saw mechanism takes its canonical form. The theory predicts the existence of a triplet of Higgs scalars much lighter than the $B-L$ breaking scale.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

27 arXiv papers cite this in 65 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 52 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 8 papers
  • Since the discovery of neutrino oscillations renormalizable Supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs [ref] have increasingly come to occupy the middle ground of the Grand Unification landscape due to their natural accommodation of seesaw mechanisms for neutrino masses and their ability to justify R-parity as a part of the gauge symmetry [ref] while preserving it unbroken to low energies [ref] when the most economical and viable Higgs set i.e $126 ⊕126 ⊕210$ is used.

    Correcting \alpha_3(M_Z) in the NMSGUT · Introduction · 0.82

  • Issues regarding natural values for superpotential couplings come into focus when viewed in the context of the so called Minimal Left Right supersymmetric models [ref] and their embedding in GUT models [ref] .

    Susy Seesaw Inflation and NMSO(10)GUT · Introduction · 0.95

  • A second possibility is to consider models with extended gauge structures which arise naturally in the context of embedding the SM gauge group in a larger group such as $SO(10)$ or $E_6$; see, , Refs. [ref] .

    SO(10) inspired gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking · Introduction · 0.95

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.