Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9711248 v2 · submitted 6 Nov 1997

Comment on Vub from Exclusive Semileptonic B and D Decays

Zoltan Ligeti, Iain W. Stewart, Mark B. Wise

The paper says

“Combining experimental data obtainable from (B->rho l nu), (B->K* l l) and (D->rho l nu) can lead to a model independent determination of |Vub| with an uncertainty from theory of about 10%.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

The prospects for determining |Vub| from exclusive B semileptonic decay are discussed. The double ratio of form factors (fB → ρ/fB → K*)/(fD → ρ/fD → K*) is calculated using chiral perturbation theory. Its deviation from unity due to contributions that are non-analytic in the symmetry breaking parameters is very small. Combining experimental data obtainable from (B->rho l nu), (B->K* l l) and (D->rho l nu) can lead to a model independent determination of |Vub| with an uncertainty from theory of about 10%.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: hedged possibility 0.99

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.49 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
The prospects for determining $|V_{ub}|$ from exclusive B semileptonic decay are discussed. background 0.72 0.20 0.06 unclear 0.62
The double ratio of form factors $(f^{B\to\rho}/f^{B\to K^*})/ (f^{D\to\rho}/f^{D\to K^*})$ is calculated using chiral perturbation theory. method 0.74 0.87 0.06 asserted 1.00
Its deviation from unity due to contributions that are non-analytic in the symmetry breaking parameters is very small. result 0.97 0.72 0.09 asserted 1.00
Combining experimental data obtainable from (B->rho l nu), (B->K* l l) and (D->rho l nu) can lead to a model independent determination of $|V_{ub}|$ with an uncertainty from theory of about 10%. result 0.66 0.49 0.87 hedged possibility 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.52 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.78

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,699 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 2 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment