Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9909497 v2 · submitted 23 Sep 1999

Neutralino relic density in a Universe with a non-vanishing cosmological constant

A.B. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos, V.C. Spanos

The paper says

“Within the context of the CMSSM a way to avoid these constraints is either to go to the large tanβ and μ > 0 region, or make τ̃R, the next to lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), be almost degenerate in mass with LSP.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We discuss the relic density of the lightest of the supersymmetric particles in view of new cosmological data, which favour the concept of an accelerating Universe with a non-vanishing cosmological constant. Recent astrophysical observations provide us with very precise values of the relevant cosmological parameters. Certain of these parameters have direct implications on particle physics, e.g., the value of matter density, which in conjunction with electroweak precision data put severe constraints on the supersymmetry breaking scale. In the context of the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM) such limits read as: $M_{1/2} \simeq 300 \GeV - 340 \GeV$, $m_0 \simeq 80 \GeV - 130 \GeV$. Within the context of the CMSSM a way to avoid these constraints is either to go to the large tanβ and μ > 0 region, or make τ̃R, the next to lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), be almost degenerate in mass with LSP.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.58

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.92 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We discuss the relic density of the lightest of the supersymmetric particles in view of new cosmological data, which favour the concept of an accelerating Universe with a non-vanishing cosmological constant. contribution 0.78 0.51 0.16 asserted 0.76
Recent astrophysical observations provide us with very precise values of the relevant cosmological parameters. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
Certain of these parameters have direct implications on particle physics, e.g., the value of matter density, which in conjunction with electroweak precision data put severe constraints on the supersymmetry breaking scale. background 0.82 0.08 0.05 asserted 0.96
In the context of the Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM) such limits read as: $M_{1/2} \simeq 300 \GeV - 340 \GeV$, $m_0 \simeq 80 \GeV - 130 \GeV$. result 0.91 0.34 0.14 asserted 0.99
Within the context of the CMSSM a way to avoid these constraints is either to go to the large $\tan \beta$ and $\mu > 0$ region, or make ${\tilde \tau}_R$, the next to lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP), be almost degenerate in mass with LSP. result 0.66 0.28 0.33 asserted 0.58

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.85 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.74

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,585 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 6 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment