Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9911252 v1 · submitted 5 Nov 1999

Electroweak and Flavor Physics in Extensions of the Standard Model with Large Extra Dimensions

A.Delgado, A.Pomarol, M.Quiros

The paper says

“The lower bounds on 1/R can increase in this case up to 5000 TeV, disfavoring these scenarios in the context of TeV-strings.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We study the implications of extra dimensions of size R ∼ 1/TeV on electroweak and flavor physics due to the presence of Kaluza-Klein excitations of the SM gauge-bosons. We consider several scenarios with the SM fermions either living in the bulk or being localized at different points of an extra dimension. Global fits to electroweak observables provide lower bounds on 1/R, which are generically in the 2-5 TeV range. We find, however, certain models where the fit to electroweak observables is better than in the SM, because of an improvement in the prediction to the weak charge Q_W. We also consider the case of softly-broken supersymmetric theories and we find new non-decoupling effects that put new constraints on 1/R. If quarks of different families live in different points of the extra dimension, we find that the Kaluza-Klein modes of the SM gluons generate (at tree level) dangerous flavor and CP-violating interactions. The lower bounds on 1/R can increase in this case up to 5000 TeV, disfavoring these scenarios in the context of TeV-strings.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.69

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.58 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We study the implications of extra dimensions of size $R\sim 1/TeV$ on electroweak and flavor physics due to the presence of Kaluza-Klein excitations of the SM gauge-bosons. contribution 0.98 0.84 0.06 asserted 0.76
We consider several scenarios with the SM fermions either living in the bulk or being localized at different points of an extra dimension. contribution 0.62 0.77 0.03 asserted 0.87
Global fits to electroweak observables provide lower bounds on 1/R, which are generically in the 2-5 TeV range. result 0.99 0.60 0.21 asserted 0.98
We find, however, certain models where the fit to electroweak observables is better than in the SM, because of an improvement in the prediction to the weak charge Q_W. result 1.00 0.95 0.11 asserted 1.00
We also consider the case of softly-broken supersymmetric theories and we find new non-decoupling effects that put new constraints on 1/R. result 0.68 0.95 0.08 asserted 1.00
If quarks of different families live in different points of the extra dimension, we find that the Kaluza-Klein modes of the SM gluons generate (at tree level) dangerous flavor and CP-violating interactions. result 0.94 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
The lower bounds on 1/R can increase in this case up to 5000 TeV, disfavoring these scenarios in the context of TeV-strings. interpretation 0.57 0.90 0.26 asserted 0.69

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.65

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,729 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 13 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

24 arXiv papers cite this in 29 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 5 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment