Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9911394 v1 · submitted 17 Nov 1999

Pion production in proton collisions with light nuclei: implications for atmospheric neutrinos

Ralph Engel, T.K. Gaisser, Todor Stanev (Bartol Research Inst.)

The paper says

“Differences among calculations of the atmospheric neutrino beam can be traced in large part to differences in the representation of pion production by protons interacting with nuclei in the atmosphere.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Differences among calculations of the atmospheric neutrino beam can be traced in large part to differences in the representation of pion production by protons interacting with nuclei in the atmosphere. In this paper we review the existing data with the goal of determining the regions of phase space in which new measurements could help to improve the input to the calculations.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.85

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.17 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Differences among calculations of the atmospheric neutrino beam can be traced in large part to differences in the representation of pion production by protons interacting with nuclei in the atmosphere. background 0.98 0.08 0.13 asserted 0.85
In this paper we review the existing data with the goal of determining the regions of phase space in which new measurements could help to improve the input to the calculations. contribution 0.85 0.49 0.09 hedged possibility 0.47

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.72

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,290 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Atmospheric neutrinos as probes of neutrino-matter interactions hep-ph · Aug 2004
  2. Uncertainties in Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes astro-ph · Nov 2006
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment