Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9912436 v5 · submitted 21 Dec 1999

An analysis of a Heavy Gluino LSP at CDF : The Heavy Gluino Window

Arash Mafi, Stuart Raby (The Ohio State University)

The paper says

“Combined with previous results of Baer et al., which use LEP data to exclude the range 3 - 22∼25 GeV, our result demonstrates that an allowed window for a heavy gluino with mass between 25 and 35 GeV is quite robust.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In this paper we consider a heavy gluino to be the lightest supersymmetric particle [LSP]. We investigate the limits on the mass of a heavy gluino LSP, using the searches for excess events in the jets plus missing momentum channel in Run I. The neutral and charged R-hadrons, containing a heavy gluino LSP, have distinct signatures at the Fermilab Tevatron. The range of excluded gluino masses depends on whether the R-hadron is charged or neutral and the amount of energy deposited in the hadronic calorimeter. The latter depends on the energy loss per collision in the calorimeter and the number of collisions; where both quantities require a model for R-hadron- Nucleon scattering. We show how the excluded range of gluino mass depends on these parameters. We find that gluinos with mass in the range between ∼ 35 GeV and ∼ 115 GeV are excluded by CDF Run I data. Combined with previous results of Baer et al., which use LEP data to exclude the range 3 - 22∼25 GeV, our result demonstrates that an allowed window for a heavy gluino with mass between 25 and 35 GeV is quite robust. Finally we discuss the relevant differences of our analysis of Tevatron data to that of Baer et al.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v5). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In this paper we consider a heavy gluino to be the lightest supersymmetric particle [LSP]. background 0.53 0.31 0.03 asserted 0.87
We investigate the limits on the mass of a heavy gluino LSP, using the searches for excess events in the jets plus missing momentum channel in Run I. contribution 0.80 0.91 0.04 asserted 0.77
The neutral and charged R-hadrons, containing a heavy gluino LSP, have distinct signatures at the Fermilab Tevatron. background 0.89 0.17 0.03 asserted 1.00
The range of excluded gluino masses depends on whether the R-hadron is charged or neutral and the amount of energy deposited in the hadronic calorimeter. method 0.38 0.55 0.04 asserted 1.00
The latter depends on the energy loss per collision in the calorimeter and the number of collisions; where both quantities require a model for R-hadron- Nucleon scattering. method 0.85 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
We show how the excluded range of gluino mass depends on these parameters. contribution 0.85 0.88 0.05 asserted 0.99
We find that gluinos with mass in the range between $\sim 35$ GeV and $\sim 115$ GeV are excluded by CDF Run I data. result 1.00 0.95 0.65 asserted 1.00
Combined with previous results of Baer et al., which use LEP data to exclude the range 3 - 22$\sim$25 GeV, our result demonstrates that an allowed window for a heavy gluino with mass between 25 and 35 GeV is quite robust. interpretation 0.60 0.51 0.47 asserted 1.00
Finally we discuss the relevant differences of our analysis of Tevatron data to that of Baer et al. contribution 0.70 0.55 0.03 unclear 0.76

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.67 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v5

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,989 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 7 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment