Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Space-Time Noncommutative Field Theories And Unitarity

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 14 May 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Field theories with space-time noncommutativity do not have a unitary S-matrix.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0005129 (version 2)
Pith IDZ5UF4MER, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJaume Gomis, Thomas Mehen (Caltech). "Space-Time Noncommutative Field Theories And Unitarity." arXiv:hep-th/0005129 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/Z5UF4MER
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,765 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the perturbative unitarity of noncommutative scalar field theories. Field theories with space-time noncommutativity do not have a unitary S-matrix. Field theories with only space noncommutativity are perturbatively unitary. This can be understood from string theory, since space noncommutative field theories describe a low energy limit of string theory in a background magnetic field. On the other hand, there is no regime in which space-time noncommutative field theory is an appropriate description of string theory. Whenever space-time noncommutative field theory becomes relevant massive open string states cannot be neglected.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the perturbative unitarity of noncommutative scalar field theories. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.05 unclear 0.70
s1 Field theories with space-time noncommutativity do not have a unitary S-matrix. result 1.00 0.62 0.76 asserted 1.00
s2 Field theories with only space noncommutativity are perturbatively unitary. result 1.00 0.64 0.21 asserted 1.00
s3 This can be understood from string theory, since space noncommutative field theories describe a low energy limit of string theory in a background magnetic field. interpretation 0.99 0.14 0.05 asserted 0.89
s4 On the other hand, there is no regime in which space-time noncommutative field theory is an appropriate description of string theory. interpretation 0.62 0.52 0.15 asserted 1.00
s5 Whenever space-time noncommutative field theory becomes relevant massive open string states cannot be neglected. interpretation 0.64 0.49 0.13 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.63.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the perturbative unitarity of noncommutative scalar field theories. Field theories with space-time noncommutativity do not have a unitary S-matrix. Field theories with only space noncommutativity are perturbatively unitary. This can be understood from string theory, since space noncommutative field theories describe a low energy limit of string theory in a background magnetic field. On the other hand, there is no regime in which space-time noncommutative field theory is an appropriate description of string theory. Whenever space-time noncommutative field theory becomes relevant massive open string states cannot be neglected.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

68 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 68 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 7 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 25 of the 87 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Cites it as support 4 of 7 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

64 arXiv papers cite this in 81 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States a conflicting result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 63 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 5 papers
Cites it as background 12 papers
  • We have three types of space-time noncommutativity [ref] : (i) The pure space-space (spacelike) NC, where $c_i0=0$; $c_ij≠0, ∀i,j=1,2,3$, makes unitary safe theory, (ii) the pure time-space (timelike) NC, with $c_i0≠0$; $c_ij=0, ∀i,j=1,2,3$, makes unitarity breaking theory, (iii) the so called lightlike noncommutativity satisfying $E^2_θ=B^2_θ$ and $E_θ ·B_θ=0$, where the $c_0i$ elements are defined by the direction of the background $E_θ=1/Λ_NC^2( c_01, c_02, c_03)$ field, while the $c_ij$ coefficients are defined by the direction of the $B_θ=1/Λ_NC^2 (c_23, -c_13, c_12)$ field, produces unitary safe NCQED theory.

    Remarks on Compton forward scattering singularity in the NCQED · Compton scattering in the NCQED and collinear singularity · 0.80

  • The former case, discussed in Eq. [ref], encodes non-commutativity among space and time coordinates, namely $θ_0i≠0$, while the latter case, in Eq. [ref], corresponds to selecting $θ_0i=0$, ensuring unitarity of the $θ$-Poincaré models [ref] .

    Strongest atomic physics bounds on Non-Commutative Quantum Gravity Models · Introduction · 0.81

  • We remark that noncommutative field theories typically contain infinitely many time derivatives in their actions, which may lead to apparent violations of unitarity [ref] and causality [ref] .

    Exponentially Long Evaporation of Noncommutative Black Hole · Introduction · 0.84

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.