Boundary String Field Theory of the DDbar System

Finn Larsen; Per Kraus

REVIEW

Boundary String Field Theory of the DDbar System

Per Kraus, Finn Larsen

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 20 Dec 2000 · 50 references

Pith's verdict: A clean BSFT derivation of the Kennedy–Wilkins RR-coupling conjecture for DDbar, with the superconnection result tied to an index theorem; the only real soft spot is the abstract's unqualified 'exact'.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 9 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0012198 (version 2)

Pith ID7NWAEZO7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationFinn Larsen, Per Kraus. "Boundary String Field Theory of the DDbar System." arXiv:hep-th/0012198 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/7NWAEZO7

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing to know: Kraus and Larsen derive the RR-couplings of the D9–D9bar system and get S = T_D9 ∫ C ∧ Str exp(2πiα'F), with F the curvature of Quillen's superconnection built from A± and T. Kennedy and Wilkins conjectured this from an S-matrix computation of the dT dT term; this paper derives it, and does so without restricting to linear tachyon profiles or constant field strengths. That is the real contribution, and it is worth having on record. The boundary-fermion machinery (Marcus/Sagnotti) is used well: the tachyon and gauge fields fall out of one superconnection, the covariant derivative comes out right via the supermatrix multiplication rule (3.11), and the non-BPS case reduces cleanly by projection. The checks are the right ones — D9 charge (5.17), D7 vortex (5.38), ABS (5.42), D8 domain wall (5.49) — and the √2 factors land where they should. The zeta-function products (2.10, 4.14) are correct as written. I'd trust the structural derivation without redoing it line by line, though the boundary-fermion reduction to (3.19) leans on Marcus and is worth a careful read by anyone who wants to use it beyond this paper. On the reader's main worry: I think the β→0 scaling argument in §5.3 is fine as a sketch because §5.6 supplies the actual proof — the same path integral is a Witten index, β-independent and invariant under supersymmetric deformations, with Q written explicitly in (5.56)–(5.60). So 'sketched rather than proven' is too strong for the integrated coupling. What is genuinely loose is the abstract's 'shown to be exact' [abstract:s3]: the paper itself says at (5.63) that the local coupling picks up derivative corrections dV that drop out of the integrated charge for constant C but matter for non-constant C. That is a scope overstatement in the abstract, not an error in the derivation. The hand-fixed normalization in (4.9) and the uncomputed β in (4.38) are acknowledged and minor. Who should read it: anyone working on tachyon condensation, brane charges, or superconnection methods in BSFT. It deserves a serious referee — the derivation is the point and it should be checked by someone who knows the boundary-fermion formalism.

Referee report

Significance

If correct, this is a substantial contribution: it derives, rather than conjectures, the Kennedy–Wilkins form of the RR-couplings of a brane–antibrane system, and it does so without restricting to constant field strengths or linear tachyon profiles. The result is parameter-free in structure — the only input is the overall tension T_{D9} — and it passes several independent, falsifiable checks: the vanishing-tachyon limit reproduces two BPS D-branes of opposite sign (5.37), the vortex reproduces T_{D7} = (2πα')T_{D9} (5.38), the ABS construction reproduces a single D(9−2m) brane with the correct i^{-m}Str γ^{2m+1} factor (5.42), and the non-BPS domain wall reproduces T_{D8} = 2π√α' T_{D9} (5.49). The identification of the integrated coupling with an index (5.62) is a genuinely useful structural statement, and the explicit supercharge (5.60) makes it checkable. The paper also states its own limitations candidly: the overall normalization is fixed by hand in (4.9), the coefficient β in (4.38) is left uncomputed, and derivative corrections to the local coupling are explicitly allowed in (5.63).

Major objections (3)

[Abstract, sentence [abstract:s3]; §5.6, Eq. (5.63)] The abstract's claim that the result is 'shown to be exact' is stronger than what §5.6 establishes, and the manuscript itself says so. Eq. (5.63) states that the local coupling receives derivative corrections, ∫ C ∧ {Str e^{2πiα'F} + dV}, and the accompanying text explains that these do not affect D-brane charges or open-string correlators only 'as long as C is constant', while for non-constant C 'the correction would have physical consequences'. The exactness result is therefore exactness of the integrated charge for constant RR potentials, not exactness of the coupling as a local functional. Since the abstract is the sentence most readers will carry away, it should be qualified in the same terms used in §5.6 — for example, 'the integrated coupling is related to an index theorem and is therefore exact for constant RR potentials'. This is a scope correction, not a challenge to the derivation.
[§5.3, the β → 0 argument preceding Eq. (5.24); §5.6, Eqs. (5.50)–(5.62)] The step that licenses the whole RR computation — dropping all nonzero modes of X and ψ — is justified in §5.3 by a single sentence: 'any of the associated diagrams carry positive powers of β'. For non-constant field configurations with derivatives of T and F, the sign of the β-scaling is not evident term by term, and the paper's own selling point in the paragraph after (5.34) is precisely that no constant-field or linear-profile restriction was made. The rigorous version of the argument does appear later, in §5.6, where the same path integral is identified as a Witten index Tr(−)^F e^{−βH} (5.50), which is β-independent and invariant under smooth supersymmetric deformations, with Q written explicitly in (5.56)–(5.60). The two arguments should be tied together at the point of use: §5.3 should forward-reference §5.6 and state that the β-independence of the index, not the diagram-by-diagram power counting, is what makes the zero-mode truncation legitimate for arbitrary field configurations. As written, a reader who stops at §5.3 has only a sketch supporting the paper's central technical claim.
[§3.1–§3.2, Eq. (3.18)–(3.19)] The reduction of the boundary-fermion action to the form (3.19), with the combination M_1 − M_0^2 that becomes the superconnection curvature (5.28), depends on the assertion that the 'higher contractions' in the Clifford-algebra identity (3.18) are exactly reproduced by the additional contractions among the fermions in the two F^I's. That matching is attributed entirely to Ref. [24], which is a 1988 laboratory report (DOE-ER-40423-09-P8) rather than a journal article, and the manuscript gives only the one-sentence justification 'In [24] it is shown that these contractions exactly match'. Because the appearance of F = dA − iA ∧ A in the exponent of (5.34) rests on this step, the reader should be given either a short explicit demonstration for the DD case or a more accessible reference. The risk is mitigated by the gauge-invariance argument the authors themselves invoke, and by the independent checks in §5.4–§5.5, so this is a request for verifiability rather than a claim of error.

Minor objections (9)

[Eqs. (4.20)–(4.21)] The Gaussian zero-mode integrals are written as √(2/y_1) and √(2/y_1)√(2/y_2), but the quoted final tensions require the factors √(2π/y_1) and √(2π/y_1)√(2π/y_2); with the factors as printed, (4.20) gives 2√2√π√α' T_{D9} rather than T_8 = 2√2π√α' T_{D9}. The final answers are correct, so this is a typographical omission of π inside the square root. In the same pair of equations, the last line of (4.21) integrates over d^9X_0 where the D7 world-volume integral d^8X_0 is intended.
[Eq. (4.17) versus Eq. (4.39)] The tachyon kinetic term appears as 8π(α')^2 ln(2) ∂_µT∂_µT in (4.17) and as 8πα' ln(2) D_µT D_µT in (4.39). Since both are written for the same normalization of T (the exponent e^{−2πα'T T} is common to the two equations), the two coefficients differ by one power of α', which is dimensionally significant. Eq. (4.17) is the one that follows from expanding F(πα'y_I) in (4.16) with y_I = α'(∂_I T_I)^2, so (4.39) appears to be the typo; please reconcile.
[Eqs. (4.37) and (4.39)] The mixed tachyon–gauge term is given as (β/4)(α')^2 e^{−2πα'T T}(F^+_{µν} − F^-_{µν})^2 in (4.37) and as (β/8)(α')^2 T T (F^+_{µν} − F^-_{µν})^2 inside (4.39). The two differ both in the overall factor and in whether the tachyon bilinear multiplies the field-strength squared; since the T T factor is expected from the (D_µT_I)^2 structure of (4.31)–(4.32), (4.37) looks incomplete. Please state the precise coefficient that the computation of (4.32)–(4.38) gives.
[§4.3, Eq. (4.38)] The coefficient β is defined as an integral of ǫ(τ−τ')G(τ,τ')K(τ,τ') and is left uncomputed, with the remark that its numerical value 'could be computed from (4.38), after regularization and renormalization'. This is an acknowledged limitation and does not affect the central RR result, but the reader should be told explicitly that the mixed term in (4.39) is therefore determined only up to this uncomputed constant.
[§4.1, Eq. (4.9) and §5.2] The overall tension T_{D9} is fixed by hand in (4.9) and, in the RR sector, by matching the known single-D9-brane charge in §5.2. The authors flag this ('we fixed the overall normalization by hand, though this presumably can be verified independently as in [27]'), so this is not a new finding, but it should be restated once in §5 near (5.34) so that the absolute normalization of the central formula is not mistaken for an output of the derivation.
[§5.5, Eqs. (5.44)–(5.48)] The non-BPS coupling (5.48) is written as an ordinary trace over group indices of an exponential containing both the 0-form T^2 and the 1-form DT. It would help to state explicitly what the trace runs over (the N-dimensional gauge group, not the 2^m-dimensional block of (5.47)) and why the 1-form terms can be handled inside a single trace without ordering ambiguities for N > 1.
[Title, abstract, and throughout] The bar over the second D is missing in the title and in the body, so that 'the DD system' reads as a single object rather than a brane–antibrane pair. Please ensure the overbar survives typesetting, since the distinction between D9–D9bar and a single D9 is the entire subject of the paper.
[§4.1, first bullet] Grammatical slip: 'A non-BPS D8-branes corresponds to y_1 = ∞ and y_2 = 0' should read 'A non-BPS D8-brane corresponds to ...'.
[Notation, §4.1–§4.3] The symbols T, T, T_I, and T_I are used for the complex tachyon, its conjugate, the real components, and their squares, with the relation T = (T^1 + iT^2)/2 stated only in (4.2). A short table of conventions at the start of §4 would make the factors of 2 and 4 in (4.9), (4.22), and (4.39) much easier to check.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

D-brane charge survives tachyon condensation as an index.

The reading

The paper asks how a D9-brane and an anti-D9-brane, with tachyon and gauge fields turned on, couple to Ramond-Ramond fields. Its answer is that the coupling is the integral of the RR potential against the Chern character of Quillen's superconnection, an object that packages the two gauge fields and the tachyon into a single matrix-valued curvature. The authors derive this from the disk partition function of boundary string field theory, using auxiliary boundary fermions to handle non-abelian degrees of freedom and reducing the computation to fermion zero modes. They check that known BPS and non-BPS D-brane couplings, and the charges of lower-dimensional branes described as tachyon solitons, come out with the right normalizations. The payoff is a compact charge formula whose integrated value is argued to be exact, so the D-brane charge of a condensate is topological rather than dependent on the detailed tachyon profile.

What carries the argument

Boundary string field theory identifies the spacetime action with the renormalized disk partition function. The paper represents non-abelian gauge fields and tachyons by boundary fermion superfields $Gamma^I=eta^I+theta F^I$, whose Clifford algebra turns matrix multiplication into the graded multiplication of a superconnection. Integrating out the auxiliary $F^I$ produces the tachyon potential and covariant derivatives, while the RR computation keeps only zero modes and evaluates a supertrace. Quillen's superconnection supplies the organizing object: its curvature $mathcal F=dmathcal A-imathcal Awedgemathcal A$ contains the two field strengths, the tachyon, and its covariant derivatives in one matrix.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Eq. (5.34): for $N$ D9--$overline{mathrm{D9}}$ pairs, the RR coupling is $S=T_{D9}int Cwedge operatorname{Str} e^{2pi i alpha' mathcal F}$, where $mathcal F$ is the curvature of Quillen's superconnection, whose matrix form is $imathcal A=begin{pmatrix}iA_+&T barbar T&iA_-end{pmatrix}$. This is not restricted to constant gauge field strengths or linear tachyon profiles. The authors show that the path integral reduces to the zero modes of $X$ and $psi$, so the result is an index of a Dirac-like operator, and they present the index theorem in Eq. (5.62). They also give the non-BPS projection and verify that a kink or vortex carries the charge and tension of the expected D8- or D7-brane.

Load-bearing premise

The exactness claim depends on the section 5.3 scaling argument that all nonzero modes of $X$ and $psi$ can be dropped from the RR path integral for arbitrary, not merely constant, tachyon and gauge backgrounds; the text sketches this by asserting that the associated diagrams carry positive powers of $beta$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

When the tachyon vanishes, the formula reduces to the difference of two BPS D-brane Chern-Simons couplings, $T_{D9}int Cwedge(e^{2pi i alpha'F_+}-e^{2pi i alpha'F_-})$, so the brane and anti-brane contribute with opposite sign.
A tachyon kink or vortex has RR charge equal to the index of the superconnection, making the charge independent of the width or detailed shape of the soliton.
The non-BPS D-brane couplings follow by projecting the D9--anti-D9 system, with the overall tension normalization fixed to $T_{D8}=2pisqrt{alpha'}T_{D9}$ in the domain-wall example.
For constant fields the action combines the tachyon potential with Born-Infeld factors; derivative corrections organize into the function $F(x)$ built from gamma functions.
Because the integrated coupling is a total derivative away from the superconnection Chern character, derivative corrections do not affect D-brane charge when the RR potential is constant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The index form suggests that D-brane charge in any tachyon condensate can be computed as a topological invariant of the superconnection, so two configurations connected by a smooth deformation should have the same RR charge even if their tachyon profiles look different.
The same boundary-fermion construction should extend to Dp--anti-Dp systems with worldvolume flux or orbifold projections, giving a template for deriving RR couplings in other unstable brane systems.
The paper's remark that noncommutative solitons use nonzero gauge fields while these BSFT solitons use vanishing gauge fields points to a field redefinition connecting the two descriptions; finding it would be a concrete test of the superconnection formula at finite $B$.

Original abstract

We develop the boundary string field theory approach to tachyon condensation on the DDbar system. Particular attention is paid to the gauge fields, which combine with the tachyons in a natural way. We derive the RR-couplings of the system and express the result in terms of Quillen's superconnection. The result is related to an index theorem, and is thus shown to be exact.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,483 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We develop the boundary string field theory approach to tachyon condensation on the DDbar system. Particular attention is paid to the gauge fields, which combine with the tachyons in a natural way. We derive the RR-couplings of the system and express the result in terms of Quillen's superconnection. The result is related to an index theorem, and is thus shown to be exact.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We develop the boundary string field theory approach to tachyon condensation on the DDbar system.	contribution 0.99	0.95	0.08	asserted 0.99
s1	Particular attention is paid to the gauge fields, which combine with the tachyons in a natural way.	contribution 0.87	0.53	0.05	asserted 0.96
s2	We derive the RR-couplings of the system and express the result in terms of Quillen's superconnection.	result 0.75	0.96	0.29	asserted 1.00
s3	The result is related to an index theorem, and is thus shown to be exact.	interpretation 0.88	0.86	0.41	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (50)

[24]

N. Marcus, “Open String And Superstring Sigma Models Wi th Boundary Fermions”, DOE-ER-40423-09-P8 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[1]

E. Witten, “Noncommutative Geometry And String Field Th eory”, Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 253

View on Pith 1986
[2]

V .A. Kostelecky and S.Samuel, “On a Nonperturbative Vac uum for the Open Bosonic String,” Nucl.Phys. B336 (1990) 263

View on Pith 1990
[3]

A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensation in string ﬁ eld theory”, JHEP 0003 (2000) 002, [hep-th/9912249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[4]

E. Witten, “On background independent open string ﬁeld t heory”, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 5467, [hep-th/9208027]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992
[5]

E. Witten, “Some computations in background independen t oﬀ-shell string theory”, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3405, [hep-th/9210065]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[6]

S. L. Shatashvili, “Comment on the background independe nt open string theory”, Phys. Lett. B311 (1993) 83, [hep-th/9303143]; “On the problems with backgro und independence in string theory”, [hep-th/9311177]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[7]

D. Kutasov, M. Marino and G. Moore, “Some exact results on tachyon condensa- tion in string ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0009148]; “Remarks on tachyon condensation in superstring ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0010108]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[8]

A. A. Gerasimov and S. L. Shatashvili, “On exact tachyon p otential in open string ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0009103]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[9]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear Electrodyna mics From Quantized Strings,” Phys. Lett. B163 (1985) 123

View on Pith 1985
[10]

A. Abouelsaood, C. G. Callan, C. R. Nappi and S. A. Yost, “ Open Strings In Back- ground Gauge Fields”, Nucl. Phys. B280 (1987) 599

View on Pith 1987
[11]

O. D. Andreev and A. A. Tseytlin, “Partition Function Re presentation For The Open Superstring Eﬀective Action: Cancellation Of M¨ obius Inﬁn ities And Derivative Cor- rections To Born-Infeld Lagrangian”, Nucl. Phys. B311 (1988) 205

View on Pith 1988
[12]

O. Andreev, “Some computations of partition functions and tachyon potentials in background independent oﬀ-shell string theory”, [hep-th/ 0010218]

View on Pith
[13]

A. A. Tseytlin, “Sigma model approach to string theory e ﬀective actions with tachyons”, [hep-th/0011033]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[14]

J. A. Harvey, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, “On the relev ance of tachyons”, [hep- th/0003101]

View on Pith
[15]

I. Aﬄeck and A. W. Ludwig, “Universal noninteger ’groun d state degeneracy’ in crit- ical quantum systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 161

View on Pith 1991
[16]

J. A. Harvey, S. Kachru, G. Moore and E. Silverstein, “Te nsion is dimension”, JHEP 0003 (2000) 001, [hep-th/9909072]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[17]

J. R. David, “Tachyon condensation using the disc parti tion function,” hep-th/0012089

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[18]

D. Quillen, “Superconnections and the Chern character ”, Topology 24 89-95 (1985). 35

View on Pith 1985
[19]

N. Berline, E. Getzler, and M. Vergne, Heat kernels and D irac operators”, Springer- Verlag (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[20]

C. Kennedy and A. Wilkins, “Ramond-Ramond couplings on brane-antibrane sys- tems”, Phys. Lett. B464 (1999) 206, [hep-th/9905195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[21]

F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, “Geometric entropy, wave func tionals, and fermions”, An- nals Phys. 243 (1995) 280, [hep-th/9408089]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[22]

A. A. Tseytlin, “Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry an d string theory”, [hep- th/9908105]

View on Pith
[23]

N. Marcus and A. Sagnotti, “Group Theory From ’Quarks’ A t The Ends Of Strings”, Phys. Lett. B188 (1987) 58

View on Pith 1987
[25]

E. Witten, “D-branes and K-theory”, JHEP 9812 (1998) 019, [hep-th/9810188]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[26]

A. Sen, “BPS D-branes on non-supersymmetric cycles,” J HEP9812, 021 (1998) [hep- th/9812031]

View on Pith 1998
[27]

D. Ghoshal and A. Sen, “Normalisation of the background independent open string ﬁeld theory action”, JHEP 0011 (2000) 021, [hep-th/0009191]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[28]

A. Sen, “Non-BPS states and branes in string theory”, [h ep-th/9904207]

View on Pith
[29]

A. Sen, “Universality of the tachyon potential”, JHEP 9912 (1999) 027, [hep- th/9911116]

View on Pith 1999
[30]

M. R. Gaberdiel, “Lectures on non-BPS Dirichlet branes ”, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 3483, [hep-th/0005029]; P. Di Vecchia and A. Liccard o, “D branes in string theory. I”, [hep-th/9912161]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[31]

M. Li, “Boundary States of D-Branes and Dy-Strings”, Nu cl. Phys. B460 (1996) 351, [hep-th/9510161]; M. R. Douglas, “Branes within branes”, [ hep-th/9512077]; P. Di Vecchia, M. Frau, I. Pesando, S. Sciuto, A. Lerda and R. Russo , “Classical p-branes from boundary state”, Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 259, [hep-th/9707068]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[32]

M. B. Green, J. A. Harvey and G. Moore, “I-brane inﬂow and anomalous couplings on D-branes”, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 47 [hep-th/9605033]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[33]

E. Witten, “Constraints On Supersymmetry Breaking,” N ucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[34]

L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, “Gravitational Anomal ies,” Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984); L. Alvarez-Gaume, “Supersymmetry And The Atiya h-Singer Index The- orem,” Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 161 (1983); “A Note On The Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem,” J. Phys. A16, 4177 (1983); D. Friedan and P. Windey, “Supersymmetric Derivation Of The Atiyah-Singer Index And T...

View on Pith 1984
[35]

M. F. Atiyah, R. Bott and A. Shapiro, “Cliﬀord Modules”, Topology 3 suppl. 1 (1964) 3. 36

View on Pith 1964
[36]

P. Horava, “Type IIA D-branes, K-theory, and matrix the ory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, (1999) 1373, [hep-th/9812135]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[37]

M. Billo, B. Craps and F. Roose, “Ramond-Ramond couplin gs of non-BPS D-branes”, JHEP9906, 033 (1999), [hep-th/9905157]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[38]

N. Wyllard, “Derivative corrections to D-brane action s with constant background ﬁelds”, [hep-th/0008125]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[39]

J. A. Harvey and P. Kraus, “D-branes as unstable lumps in bosonic open string ﬁeld theory,” JHEP 0004, (2000) 012, [hep-th/0002117]; N. Berkovits, A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensation in superstring ﬁeld the ory,” Nucl. Phys. B587, (2000) 147, [hep-th/0002211]; R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, M. Mihailescu and R. Tatar, “Lumps and p-branes in open ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[40]

J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus, F. Larsen and E. J. Martinec, “D-b ranes and strings as non- commutative solitons”, JHEP 0007 (2000) 042, [hep-th/0005031]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[41]

E. Witten, “Noncommutative tachyons and string ﬁeld th eory”, [hep-th/0006071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[42]

N. Berkovits, “The Tachyon Potential in Open Neveu-Sch warz String Field Theory”, [hep-th/0001084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[43]

N. Berkovits, A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensa tion in superstring ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0002211]; P. De Smet and J. Raeymaekers, “ Level four approximation to the tachyon potential in superstring ﬁeld theory”, JHEP 0005 (2000) 051, [hep- th/0003220]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[44]

J. R. David, “U(1) gauge invariance from open string ﬁel d theory”, JHEP 0010, (2000) 017, [hep-th/0005085]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[45]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommuta tive geometry,” JHEP 9909, (1999) 032, [hep-th/9908142]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[46]

J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus and F. Larsen, “Exact noncommutat ive solitons”, [hep- th/0010060]

View on Pith
[47]

L. Cornalba, “D-brane physics and noncommutative Yang -Mills theory”, [hep- th/9909081]; N. Ishibashi, “A relation between commutativ e and noncommutative descriptions of D-branes”,[hep-th/9909176]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[48]

M. R. Garousi, “Tachyon couplings on non-BPS D-branes a nd Dirac-Born-Infeld ac- tion”, Nucl. Phys. B584 (2000) 284, [hep-th/0003122]; E. A. Bergshoeﬀ, M. de Roo, T. C. de Wit, E. Eyras and S. Panda, “T-duality and actions for non-BPS D-branes”, JHEP0005 (2000) 009, [hep-th/0003221]; J. Kluson, “Proposal for non -BPS D-brane action”, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[49]

K. Hori,“Linear Models of Supersymmetric D-Branes”, [ hep-th/0012179]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[50]

T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi, “Brane-anti brane action from boundary string ﬁeld theory,” hep-th/0012210. 37

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Phases Of N=2 Theories In 1+1 Dimensions With Boundary
hep-th 2008-03 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

A charge window, −S/2 < θ/2π + q < S/2, is the necessary and sufficient condition for a B-type D-brane to admit a parallel family across a phase boundary in Abelian linear sigma models.
Quark flavors in hot and dense holographic QCD: setup and comparison to data
hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A 2+1 flavor holographic QCD model fitted to lattice thermodynamics predicts a smoother nuclear-to-quark matter transition with lower latent heat than earlier V-QCD models.
On the black hole/string transition
hep-th 2021-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A supersymmetric index and K-theory argument obstructs a continuous classical connection between the Horowitz-Polchinski string solution and the small black hole in type II string theory, but not in the heterotic string.
Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit
hep-ph 2011-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A bottom-up holographic model with fully backreacting flavors places the edge of the QCD conformal window near N_f/N_c of about 4 and reproduces Miransky scaling just below it.
Dirac-Born-Infeld Action on the Tachyon Kink and Vortex
hep-th 2003-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The kink and vortex solitons of the tachyon effective field theory reproduce the exact Dirac-Born-Infeld world-volume action of BPS D-branes, with no higher-derivative corrections.

Show 12 more citing papers

The Tachyon Chern-Simons action with a generic tachyon field, and baryons in V-QCD
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

General Tachyon-Chern-Simons forms are built via Quillen superconnections for arbitrary tachyon matrices, and baryon number equals the superconnection instanton number even with massive, flavor-dependent quarks.
Supergravity flows, wormholes and their pseudo-Hermitian holographic duals
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Supergravity truncations admit real-metric wormhole solutions via imaginary scalar extensions whose holographic duals are pseudo-Hermitian and PT-symmetric, interpretable as entangled brane states.
Superconnections in AdS/QCD and the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon $g-2$
hep-ph 2024-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A scalar-extended Chern-Simons superconnection in hard-wall AdS/QCD improves f1-f1' mixing and photon rates while leaving the combined axial-vector plus excited-pseudoscalar HLBL contribution to muon g-2 stable near 32e-11.
Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit
hep-ph 2015-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Finite quark mass in backreacted holographic QCD produces a three-regime scaling structure (perturbative, walking/hyperscaling, decoupling) with an Efimov spiral in the condensate and a GOR relation that survives full...
Exact results for boundaries and domain walls in 2d supersymmetric theories
hep-th 2013-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The hemisphere partition function of a 2d N=(2,2) gauge theory with B-type boundary conditions computes the exact D-brane central charge and depends only on the brane's K-theory class.
Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II
hep-th 2007-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a five-dimensional holographic model of pure Yang-Mills, quark confinement and a discrete glueball spectrum follow from the same infrared condition on the geometry, and one background reproduces lattice glueball ma...
Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation
hep-th 2007-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The open string tachyon of coincident flavor brane-antibrane pairs acts as the holographic quark condensate, reproducing chiral symmetry breaking, QCD anomalies, Goldstone bosons, the GOR relation, and linear confinem...
On Time-dependent Collapsing Branes and Fuzzy Odd-dimensional Spheres
hep-th 2006-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Fuzzy S3 and S5 configurations are shown to be time-dependent solutions of the D0-brane Matrix Model and its DBI generalization, with identical large-N dynamics and no bounce.
An AdS/QCD model from tachyon condensation: II
hep-ph 2010-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A brane-antibrane tachyon model of holographic QCD reproduces light meson masses and decay constants to about 15 percent and yields asymptotically linear Regge trajectories, using one extra fitted parameter.
Sakai-Sugimoto model, Tachyon Condensation and Chiral symmetry Breaking
hep-th 2007-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Including the D8-anti-D8 tachyon in the Sakai-Sugimoto model admits asymptotic solutions in which tachyon condensation and chiral symmetry breaking happen at the same bulk point.
Ghost D-brane, Supersymmetry and Matrix Model
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The U(N|N) matrix model for D(-1)-brane plus ghost D(-1)-brane pairs preserves all 32 supersymmetries at the symmetric vacuum, with half realized nonlinearly.
D1-brane with Overcritical Electric Field in AdS3 and S-brane
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Unphysical dS2-branes in AdS3 with imaginary electric flux are reinterpreted, via T-duality, as S0-branes from tachyon condensation, with S(p-1)-branes carrying imaginary NS-NS tension.

How later papers used it

47 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 46 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 4 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 11 of the 76 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 1 of 2 papers with this label

Repeated this paper's computation to evaluate the BSFT action.

Spherical D-brane by Tachyon Condensation (2017) · 0.91 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

47 arXiv papers cite this in 76 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 56 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 2 papers

Therefore, by repeating the computation in [ref] , the BSFT action can be evaluated as [equation] where the function $F(y)≡4^y y Γ(y)^2/2Γ(2y) ∼√(πy)$ ($y ≫1$) comes from the linear term in the expansion ([ref]).

Spherical D-brane by Tachyon Condensation · D2-brane tension · 0.91
One method for finding these effective actions is BSFT [ref] .

Three Point Tree Level Amplitude in Superstring Theory · Introduction · 0.86

Compares with it 2 papers

Thus, our action represents a truncated version of the $(Dp,D̅p̅)$ action that can be derived from the results in [ref] [Note that in comparing with the boundary string field theory results [ref] there is the usual discrepancy by $2log2$ in the kinetic term of the tachyon [ref] .].

Confinement and Non-perturbative Tachyons in Brane-Antibrane Systems · The $(Dp,D̅p̅)$ system in dual variables · 0.90
Compared to their counterpart obtained in the truncated theories [ref] , these kinks are singular and require regularization.

Dirac-Born-Infeld actions and Tachyon Monopoles · Introduction · 0.99

Cites it as background 15 papers

Furthermore, in [ref] the non-abelian generalization was discussed introducing boundary fermions [ref] which correspond to Chan-Paton factors describing coincident D-branes after quantizing boundary fermions.

Supersymmetric Non-abelian DBI Equations from Open Pure Spinor Superstring · Introduction · 0.80
In particular, the annihilation of parallel D-branes and -branes is sufficiently simple to allow both a limited worldsheet analysis [ref] as well as an effective description in terms of a single homogeneous tachyon field [ref] .

Inhomogeneous tachyon dynamics and the zipper · Introduction · 0.94
One is the nonlocal action derived in boundary string field theory (BSFT) [ref] , and the other is Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) type action [ref] .

Relativistic Dynamics of Multi-BPS D-vortices and Straight BPS D-strings · Introduction · 0.94

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [24]

N. Marcus, “Open String And Superstring Sigma Models Wi th Boundary Fermions”, DOE-ER-40423-09-P8 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[2] [1]

E. Witten, “Noncommutative Geometry And String Field Th eory”, Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 253

View on Pith 1986

[3] [2]

V .A. Kostelecky and S.Samuel, “On a Nonperturbative Vac uum for the Open Bosonic String,” Nucl.Phys. B336 (1990) 263

View on Pith 1990

[4] [3]

A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensation in string ﬁ eld theory”, JHEP 0003 (2000) 002, [hep-th/9912249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[5] [4]

E. Witten, “On background independent open string ﬁeld t heory”, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 5467, [hep-th/9208027]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992

[6] [5]

E. Witten, “Some computations in background independen t oﬀ-shell string theory”, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3405, [hep-th/9210065]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[7] [6]

S. L. Shatashvili, “Comment on the background independe nt open string theory”, Phys. Lett. B311 (1993) 83, [hep-th/9303143]; “On the problems with backgro und independence in string theory”, [hep-th/9311177]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[8] [7]

D. Kutasov, M. Marino and G. Moore, “Some exact results on tachyon condensa- tion in string ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0009148]; “Remarks on tachyon condensation in superstring ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0010108]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[9] [8]

A. A. Gerasimov and S. L. Shatashvili, “On exact tachyon p otential in open string ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0009103]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[10] [9]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear Electrodyna mics From Quantized Strings,” Phys. Lett. B163 (1985) 123

View on Pith 1985

[11] [10]

A. Abouelsaood, C. G. Callan, C. R. Nappi and S. A. Yost, “ Open Strings In Back- ground Gauge Fields”, Nucl. Phys. B280 (1987) 599

View on Pith 1987

[12] [11]

O. D. Andreev and A. A. Tseytlin, “Partition Function Re presentation For The Open Superstring Eﬀective Action: Cancellation Of M¨ obius Inﬁn ities And Derivative Cor- rections To Born-Infeld Lagrangian”, Nucl. Phys. B311 (1988) 205

View on Pith 1988

[13] [12]

O. Andreev, “Some computations of partition functions and tachyon potentials in background independent oﬀ-shell string theory”, [hep-th/ 0010218]

View on Pith

[14] [13]

A. A. Tseytlin, “Sigma model approach to string theory e ﬀective actions with tachyons”, [hep-th/0011033]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[15] [14]

J. A. Harvey, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, “On the relev ance of tachyons”, [hep- th/0003101]

View on Pith

[16] [15]

I. Aﬄeck and A. W. Ludwig, “Universal noninteger ’groun d state degeneracy’ in crit- ical quantum systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 161

View on Pith 1991

[17] [16]

J. A. Harvey, S. Kachru, G. Moore and E. Silverstein, “Te nsion is dimension”, JHEP 0003 (2000) 001, [hep-th/9909072]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[18] [17]

J. R. David, “Tachyon condensation using the disc parti tion function,” hep-th/0012089

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[19] [18]

D. Quillen, “Superconnections and the Chern character ”, Topology 24 89-95 (1985). 35

View on Pith 1985

[20] [19]

N. Berline, E. Getzler, and M. Vergne, Heat kernels and D irac operators”, Springer- Verlag (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[21] [20]

C. Kennedy and A. Wilkins, “Ramond-Ramond couplings on brane-antibrane sys- tems”, Phys. Lett. B464 (1999) 206, [hep-th/9905195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[22] [21]

F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, “Geometric entropy, wave func tionals, and fermions”, An- nals Phys. 243 (1995) 280, [hep-th/9408089]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[23] [22]

A. A. Tseytlin, “Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry an d string theory”, [hep- th/9908105]

View on Pith

[24] [23]

N. Marcus and A. Sagnotti, “Group Theory From ’Quarks’ A t The Ends Of Strings”, Phys. Lett. B188 (1987) 58

View on Pith 1987

[25] [25]

E. Witten, “D-branes and K-theory”, JHEP 9812 (1998) 019, [hep-th/9810188]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[26] [26]

A. Sen, “BPS D-branes on non-supersymmetric cycles,” J HEP9812, 021 (1998) [hep- th/9812031]

View on Pith 1998

[27] [27]

D. Ghoshal and A. Sen, “Normalisation of the background independent open string ﬁeld theory action”, JHEP 0011 (2000) 021, [hep-th/0009191]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[28] [28]

A. Sen, “Non-BPS states and branes in string theory”, [h ep-th/9904207]

View on Pith

[29] [29]

A. Sen, “Universality of the tachyon potential”, JHEP 9912 (1999) 027, [hep- th/9911116]

View on Pith 1999

[30] [30]

M. R. Gaberdiel, “Lectures on non-BPS Dirichlet branes ”, Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) 3483, [hep-th/0005029]; P. Di Vecchia and A. Liccard o, “D branes in string theory. I”, [hep-th/9912161]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[31] [31]

M. Li, “Boundary States of D-Branes and Dy-Strings”, Nu cl. Phys. B460 (1996) 351, [hep-th/9510161]; M. R. Douglas, “Branes within branes”, [ hep-th/9512077]; P. Di Vecchia, M. Frau, I. Pesando, S. Sciuto, A. Lerda and R. Russo , “Classical p-branes from boundary state”, Nucl. Phys. B507 (1997) 259, [hep-th/9707068]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[32] [32]

M. B. Green, J. A. Harvey and G. Moore, “I-brane inﬂow and anomalous couplings on D-branes”, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 47 [hep-th/9605033]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[33] [33]

E. Witten, “Constraints On Supersymmetry Breaking,” N ucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[34] [34]

L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, “Gravitational Anomal ies,” Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984); L. Alvarez-Gaume, “Supersymmetry And The Atiya h-Singer Index The- orem,” Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 161 (1983); “A Note On The Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem,” J. Phys. A16, 4177 (1983); D. Friedan and P. Windey, “Supersymmetric Derivation Of The Atiyah-Singer Index And T...

View on Pith 1984

[35] [35]

M. F. Atiyah, R. Bott and A. Shapiro, “Cliﬀord Modules”, Topology 3 suppl. 1 (1964) 3. 36

View on Pith 1964

[36] [36]

P. Horava, “Type IIA D-branes, K-theory, and matrix the ory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, (1999) 1373, [hep-th/9812135]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[37] [37]

M. Billo, B. Craps and F. Roose, “Ramond-Ramond couplin gs of non-BPS D-branes”, JHEP9906, 033 (1999), [hep-th/9905157]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[38] [38]

N. Wyllard, “Derivative corrections to D-brane action s with constant background ﬁelds”, [hep-th/0008125]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[39] [39]

J. A. Harvey and P. Kraus, “D-branes as unstable lumps in bosonic open string ﬁeld theory,” JHEP 0004, (2000) 012, [hep-th/0002117]; N. Berkovits, A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensation in superstring ﬁeld the ory,” Nucl. Phys. B587, (2000) 147, [hep-th/0002211]; R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, M. Mihailescu and R. Tatar, “Lumps and p-branes in open ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[40] [40]

J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus, F. Larsen and E. J. Martinec, “D-b ranes and strings as non- commutative solitons”, JHEP 0007 (2000) 042, [hep-th/0005031]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[41] [41]

E. Witten, “Noncommutative tachyons and string ﬁeld th eory”, [hep-th/0006071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[42] [42]

N. Berkovits, “The Tachyon Potential in Open Neveu-Sch warz String Field Theory”, [hep-th/0001084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[43] [43]

N. Berkovits, A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Tachyon condensa tion in superstring ﬁeld theory”, [hep-th/0002211]; P. De Smet and J. Raeymaekers, “ Level four approximation to the tachyon potential in superstring ﬁeld theory”, JHEP 0005 (2000) 051, [hep- th/0003220]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[44] [44]

J. R. David, “U(1) gauge invariance from open string ﬁel d theory”, JHEP 0010, (2000) 017, [hep-th/0005085]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[45] [45]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommuta tive geometry,” JHEP 9909, (1999) 032, [hep-th/9908142]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[46] [46]

J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus and F. Larsen, “Exact noncommutat ive solitons”, [hep- th/0010060]

View on Pith

[47] [47]

L. Cornalba, “D-brane physics and noncommutative Yang -Mills theory”, [hep- th/9909081]; N. Ishibashi, “A relation between commutativ e and noncommutative descriptions of D-branes”,[hep-th/9909176]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[48] [48]

M. R. Garousi, “Tachyon couplings on non-BPS D-branes a nd Dirac-Born-Infeld ac- tion”, Nucl. Phys. B584 (2000) 284, [hep-th/0003122]; E. A. Bergshoeﬀ, M. de Roo, T. C. de Wit, E. Eyras and S. Panda, “T-duality and actions for non-BPS D-branes”, JHEP0005 (2000) 009, [hep-th/0003221]; J. Kluson, “Proposal for non -BPS D-brane action”, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[49] [49]

K. Hori,“Linear Models of Supersymmetric D-Branes”, [ hep-th/0012179]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[50] [50]

T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi, “Brane-anti brane action from boundary string ﬁeld theory,” hep-th/0012210. 37

View on Pith Pith review arXiv