Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Notes on Noncommutative Instantons

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 1 Aug 2001

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In particular, we show for the first time how to construct explicitly regular U(N) instanton solutions on R_{NC}^4 and on R_{NC}^2 x R^2.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0108007 (version 3)
Pith IDSMZYW5ZJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChong-Sun Chu, Gabriele Travaglini, Valentin V. Khoze. "Notes on Noncommutative Instantons." arXiv:hep-th/0108007 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/SMZYW5ZJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,523 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.87 · states limitation 0.30 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.38 · compares with prior results 0.85 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study in detail the ADHM construction of U(N) instantons on noncommutative Euclidean space-time R_{NC}^4 and noncommutative space R_{NC}^2 x R^2. We point out that the completeness condition in the ADHM construction could be invalidated in certain circumstances. When this happens, regular instanton configuration may not exist even if the ADHM constraints are satisfied. Some of the existing solutions in the literature indeed violate the completeness condition and hence are not correct. We present alternative solutions for these cases. In particular, we show for the first time how to construct explicitly regular U(N) instanton solutions on R_{NC}^4 and on R_{NC}^2 x R^2. We also give a simple general argument based on the Corrigan's identity that the topological charge of noncommutative regular instantons is always an integer.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study in detail the ADHM construction of U(N) instantons on noncommutative Euclidean space-time R_{NC}^4 and noncommutative space R_{NC}^2 x R^2. contribution 0.93 0.91 0.05 asserted 0.98
s1 We point out that the completeness condition in the ADHM construction could be invalidated in certain circumstances. result 0.78 0.86 0.23 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 When this happens, regular instanton configuration may not exist even if the ADHM constraints are satisfied. result 0.69 0.59 0.19 hedged possibility 0.99
s3 Some of the existing solutions in the literature indeed violate the completeness condition and hence are not correct. result 0.82 0.43 0.14 asserted 0.98
s4 We present alternative solutions for these cases. contribution 0.99 0.93 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 In particular, we show for the first time how to construct explicitly regular U(N) instanton solutions on R_{NC}^4 and on R_{NC}^2 x R^2. contribution 0.96 0.97 0.50 asserted 1.00
s6 We also give a simple general argument based on the Corrigan's identity that the topological charge of noncommutative regular instantons is always an integer. result 0.63 0.93 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study in detail the ADHM construction of U(N) instantons on noncommutative Euclidean space-time R_{NC}^4 and noncommutative space R_{NC}^2 x R^2. We point out that the completeness condition in the ADHM construction could be invalidated in certain circumstances. When this happens, regular instanton configuration may not exist even if the ADHM constraints are satisfied. Some of the existing solutions in the literature indeed violate the completeness condition and hence are not correct. We present alternative solutions for these cases. In particular, we show for the first time how to construct explicitly regular U(N) instanton solutions on R_{NC}^4 and on R_{NC}^2 x R^2. We also give a simple general argument based on the Corrigan's identity that the topological charge of noncommutative regular instantons is always an integer.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 9 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • Usually the single instanton solution in $ℝ_NC^2 ×ℝ_C^2$ with $U(1)$ gauge group is normalized as [ref] [equation] But in our solution this technique cannot be used because in this case $Ψ_0^†Ψ_0=N_1-Λ_-/N_1-1δ(δ-1)$ vanishes when it operates on the state $|0⟩$ and the inverse of $Ψ_0^†Ψ_0$ does not exist.

    Noncommutative Vortices and Instantons from Generalized Bose Operators · $ℝ^2_NC×ℝ^2_C$: · 0.86

Cites it as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.