Large-N bounds on, and compositeness limit of, gauge and gravitational interactions

G. Veneziano

REVIEW

Large-N bounds on, and compositeness limit of, gauge and gravitational interactions

G. Veneziano

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 15 Oct 2001 · 17 references

Pith's verdict: A clean one-loop statement that N species push the cutoff-scale gauge and gravitational couplings down to 1/N — correct as far as it goes, but the bound rests on a cutoff scheme the paper never builds.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0110129 (version 2)

Pith IDD4WIPYL6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationG. Veneziano. "Large-N bounds on, and compositeness limit of, gauge and gravitational interactions." arXiv:hep-th/0110129 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/D4WIPYL6

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing to take away: with N matter species and a physical cutoff, Veneziano argues the renormalized couplings at the cutoff are bounded, α_G ≲ c/N and α_g ≲ c/N^p, so the infinite-bare-coupling limit is smooth rather than singular. The gravitational half is not new — footnote 1 credits Tomboulis and the black-hole literature — but the gauge half, especially the D=4 scale-dependent version in eq (8) and the confinement-scale formula (9), is, and the packaging is useful. The abstract's claim [abstract:s0] is the right summary of what he is after, though the body is more careful than the abstract about it. What is done well: the heat-kernel computation in eqs (5)–(11) is standard and correctly assembled, and the algebra is easy to check. The D=4 discussion is the most interesting part — the bound weakens below the matter threshold and the theory runs to strong coupling in the IR, with Λ_conf/Λ = (m/Λ)^{1+β_tot/β1}, which is concrete enough to test on the lattice, and he says that work is underway. The entropy-bound observation is genuinely nice: the causal entropy bound at T = Λ is literally the 1/N bound, so the species problem dissolves rather than being patched. Soft spots, in order of weight. First, the bound is scheme-dependent in a way the paper acknowledges but does not resolve. The Λ^{D-4} coefficient behind eq (7) is a power divergence; in a scheme that drops power divergences it is simply absent and the bound goes with it. He says the signs depend on 'the explicit implementation of the cut-off' and never constructs one or computes β0, β1/2, β1 in any concrete scheme. That is the load-bearing gap, and 'are shown to be bounded' in the abstract is stronger than 'modulo a certain generic assumption' in the body. Second, the UV-completion check is deferred to [5], listed as in preparation, so the string-theory claim is promissory. Third, Section 3 opens by assuming the result survives matter self-interactions, which is not shown; the four applications are sketches, and the quintessence one leans on [17], also to appear. None of this is hidden — he flags each caveat in the text — but the paper is a program statement more than a settled result. Who should read it: anyone working on large-N, species scales, or cutoff gravity. Worth a serious referee; the one-loop core is right and the framing will be cited.

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[§2, Eq. (7) and the paragraph following it] The bound α_g ≤ (β0 + β1/2 − β1)^{-1} is a 1/N bound only if that combination is positive and O(N). The paper states this explicitly — 'modulo a certain generic assumption about one-loop contributions' in §1 and 'this conclusion only holds generically' after Eq. (7) — and adds that 'the actual signs [are] dependent of the explicit implementation of the cut-off.' That is the load-bearing point: the Λ^{D−4} coefficient is power-divergent and therefore scheme-dependent (it is absent in dimensional regularization/MS), so the bound as stated is conditional on a cutoff that preserves gauge invariance and general covariance but is never constructed. The abstract's 'are shown to be bounded' overstates what is delivered. The paper defers the check to Ref. [5], which is listed as 'in preparation' and so cannot support the claim; either the coefficient should be computed in a specified invariant cutoff, or the abstract and §1 should be softened to a conditional statement.
[§2, Eq. (11)] The gravitational bound requires c0N0 + c1/2N1/2 + c1N1 > 0, but the paper gives no sign for c1 (the gauge-boson contribution) and does not discuss whether the combination can vanish or change sign. Footnote 1 cites Tomboulis [3] and Refs. [4] for the large-N behaviour of G_N, but those works do not establish the sign of c1 in the cutoff used here. The sign, or the condition under which it holds, should be stated explicitly, in parallel with the discussion of β0 + β1/2 − β1 in the gauge case.
[§1, Eq. (2) versus §2, Eqs. (7) and (12)] Eq. (2) states that the gauge bound has the form c1/N^p with 0 < p < 1 for D > 4, but Eqs. (7) and (12) give α_g ~ (β0 + β1/2 − β1)^{-1} ~ 1/N under the stated large-N scaling, i.e. p = 1. Either the derived bound is stronger than the headline equation claims (in which case Eq. (2) should be sharpened and the reason for the weaker stated form removed), or there is a reason p is strictly less than 1 that the paper should explain. As written, the exponent in the paper's central equation is not reconciled with its own derivation.

Minor objections (6)

[§2, Eq. (12)] The average <...> over matter fields is not defined: it is unclear whether it is weighted by N_f, by the number of species, or is an unweighted mean over representations. A one-line definition would make the compact form of the bound usable.
[§2, Eq. (9)] The confinement-scale formula Λ_conf/Λ = (m/Λ)^{1+β_tot/β1} is a nontrivial consequence of Eq. (8) and is quoted without the intermediate step. A short derivation would help the reader verify the exponent.
[§2, D = 4 gauge case] The statement that the bound is 'scale dependent' and the accompanying discussion of infrared logarithms is qualitative. A sentence on what 'the bound' means as q → 0, where the logarithms grow, would clarify the sense in which a bound survives in the infrared.
[§3] The applications rest on the assumption that the results extend to matter self-interactions, which the paper states. The entropy-bound, dilaton and quintessence discussions are qualitative and should be labelled as such, particularly the claim in Eq. (14) that M_P²/M_GUT² ~ N ~ α_GUT^{-2}, which is presented as an order-of-magnitude relation without a derivation.
[§3, Ref. [17]] The equivalence-principle and quintessence claims are supported by Ref. [17], listed as 'to appear.' Since that work is unpublished, the corresponding statements should be flagged as provisional in the text.
[§1, Eq. (1)] The ellipses in the matter action and after the fermion term should be specified: which additional fields are included, and what is meant by the 'ultraviolet completion' that implements the cutoff. This matters because the whole argument depends on the properties of that completion.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

With many matter species, the strength of gauge and gravitational interactions at the ultraviolet cutoff is capped by powers of $1/N$, so the infinitely-strongly-coupled 'compositeness' limit becomes smooth rather than singular.

The reading

Veneziano asks a deceptively simple question: what happens to the strength of gauge and gravitational interactions when a theory contains a very large number $N$ of matter species and is defined only up to a finite ultraviolet cutoff $Lambdab$? His answer is that the physical couplings at that cutoff cannot be made arbitrarily large, because they are squeezed down by powers of $1/N$. Concretely, $Lalpha_g Lequiv g^2 Lambda^{D-4}$ is bounded by $c_1/N^{p}$ with $0

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the heat-kernel expansion of the matter-induced effective action after the matter fields are integrated out exactly, since they enter only quadratically. That expansion separates a local, cutoff-dominated piece, which shifts the coefficients of $R$ and $F_{LmuLnu}F^{LmuLnu}$ by amounts proportional to the number of species, from non-local pieces that start at four derivatives and are dropped. The shift is what does the work: because the correction to the inverse coupling grows with $N$ while the bare term does not, the renormalized coupling is bounded by roughly $1/N$ independently of how large the bare coupling was. The same structure turns the $D=4$ pole into an infrared logarithm, converting the bound into a statement about where the theory becomes strongly coupled in the infrared rather than at the cutoff.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The claim is a pair of inequalities. Integrating out $N$ non-self-interacting scalars and fermions from a $D$-dimensional theory with an invariant cutoff $Lambda$ generates local terms in the effective action proportional to $N Lambda^{D-2} R$ and to $(Lbeta_0+Lbeta_{1/2})Lambda^{D-4}F^{2}$, and these add to the bare inverse couplings. The renormalized couplings at the cutoff therefore obey $4piLalpha_g Lsim [g_0^{-2}Lambda^{4-D} + (Lbeta_0+Lbeta_{1/2}) - Lbeta_1]^{-1}$ for $D>4$ and $8piLalpha_G Lsim [Lkappa_0^{-2}Lambda^{2-D} + c_0N_0 + c_{1/2}N_{1/2} + c_1N_1]^{-1}$ at all $D Lge 4$, so both are bounded above by an $N$-suppressed quantity and both bounds are saturated as the bare couplings go to infinity. In $D=4$ the gauge statement becomes a scale-dependent one, with logarithmic running and a confinement scale given by $LLambda_{Lrm conf}/LLambda = (m/LLambda)^{1+Lbeta_{Lrm tot}/Lbeta_1}$, which the author notes can generate exponentially large hierarchies. The author states explicitly that the gauge result holds only 'modulo a certain generic assumption about one-loop contributions', namely that the matter coefficients do not cancel against the gauge coefficient, and that the whole picture may depend on how the ultraviolet cutoff is implemented, with a string-theory check listed as work in progress.

Load-bearing premise

The gauge bound holds only if the one-loop matter coefficients $Lbeta_0+Lbeta_{1/2}$ are large and positive and do not cancel against the gauge-field coefficient $Lbeta_1$; the author states this as a genericity assumption rather than proving that no cancellation occurs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The infinite-bare-coupling (compositeness) limit of gauge and gravitational theories exists and is smooth, so a theory that looks weakly coupled at low energy need not have weakly coupled fundamentals.
Holographic and causal entropy bounds, which are geometric and carry no explicit $N$ dependence while the entropy does grow with $N$, can survive a large number of species if the Planck length shrinks fast enough with $N$, which is exactly what the gravitational bound supplies.
Dilaton stabilization in string theory could occur near strong bare four-dimensional coupling or near the self-dual value, without producing an unacceptable unified gauge coupling or an unacceptable ratio of the Planck to the GUT scale.
The same renormalization suggests an order-of-magnitude relation $M_P^2/M_{Lrm GUT}^2 Lsim N Lsim Lalpha_{Lrm GUT}^{-2}$, resembling the open-string relation that reconciles the GUT and string scales.
A runaway dilaton coupled to dark matter but decoupled from baryons in the strong-coupling limit becomes a candidate for quintessence, with small but possibly observable equivalence-principle violation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the bound is generic, it reframes the hierarchy problem: a large hidden sector of matter species is not a liability for gravity but a mechanism that keeps the dimensionless gravitational coupling small at the cutoff, so 'why is gravity so weak' and 'how many species exist' become the same question.
The $D=4$ confinement-scale formula is a concrete, checkable prediction for a theory with far more flavours than colours, a regime that has only recently become accessible to lattice simulation; it is the sharpest empirical handle the paper offers.
The argument's dependence on the ultraviolet completion cuts both ways: if a string-theory computation shows the coefficients are completion-dependent rather than universal, the bound survives only as a statement about a particular cutoff scheme rather than about physics.
The entropy-bound application suggests a general rule of thumb worth stating separately: any geometric bound that ignores $N$ must be paired with an $N$-dependent renormalization of the Planck length, or it will be violated by a large hidden sector.

Original abstract

In a toy model of gauge and gravitational interactions in $D \ge 4$ dimensions, endowed with an invariant UV cut-off $\Lambda$, and containing a large number $N$ of non-self-interacting matter species, the physical gauge and gravitational couplings at the cut-off, $\alpha_g \equiv g^2 \Lambda^{D-4}$ and $\alpha_G \equiv G_N \Lambda^{D-2}$, are shown to be bounded by appropriate powers of ${1\over N}$. This implies that the infinite-bare-coupling (so-called compositeness) limit of these theories is smooth, and can even resemble our world. We argue that such a result, when extended to more realistic situations, can help avoid large-N violations of entropy bounds, solve the dilaton stabilization and GUT-scale problems in superstring theory, and provide a new possible candidate for quintessence.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,170 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.71 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

In a toy model of gauge and gravitational interactions in $D \ge 4$ dimensions, endowed with an invariant UV cut-off $\Lambda$, and containing a large number $N$ of non-self-interacting matter species, the physical gauge and gravitational couplings at the cut-off, $\alpha_g \equiv g^2 \Lambda^{D-4}$ and $\alpha_G \equiv G_N \Lambda^{D-2}$, are shown to be bounded by appropriate powers of ${1\over N}$. This implies that the infinite-bare-coupling (so-called compositeness) limit of these theories is smooth, and can even resemble our world. We argue that such a result, when extended to more realistic situations, can help avoid large-N violations of entropy bounds, solve the dilaton stabilization and GUT-scale problems in superstring theory, and provide a new possible candidate for quintessence.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	In a toy model of gauge and gravitational interactions in $D \ge 4$ dimensions, endowed with an invariant UV cut-off $\Lambda$, and containing a large number $N$ of non-self-interacting matter species, the physical gauge and gravitational couplings at the cut-off, $\alpha_g \equiv g^2 \Lambda^{D-4}$ and $\alpha_G \equiv G_N \Lambda^{D-2}$, are shown to be bounded by appropriate powers of ${1\over N}$.	result 0.96	0.90	0.71	asserted 1.00
s1	This implies that the infinite-bare-coupling (so-called compositeness) limit of these theories is smooth, and can even resemble our world.	interpretation 0.99	0.76	0.31	asserted 0.75
s2	We argue that such a result, when extended to more realistic situations, can help avoid large-N violations of entropy bounds, solve the dilaton stabilization and GUT-scale problems in superstring theory, and provide a new possible candidate for quintessence.	interpretation 0.97	0.28	0.20	hedged possibility 0.84

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (17)

[5]

E. Kohlprath and G. Veneziano, in preparation

View on Pith
[17]

T. Damour, F. Piazza and G. Veneziano, to appear. 7

View on Pith
[3]

E. T. Tomboulis, in Highlights in Gravitation and Cosmology , Proceedings of Goa Con- ference, Goa, India (1987), p. 132

View on Pith 1987
[4]

T. Jacobson, gr-qc/9404039; L. Susskind and Uglum , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2700 (hep-th/9401070); V. Frolov, D. Fursaev and A. I. Zelnikov, Nucl. Phys. B 486 (1997) 6 339 (hep-th/9607104); S. Hawking, J. Maldacena and A. Stroming er, JHEP 0105 (2001) 001 (hep-th/0002145)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[1]

L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B 136, 115 (1978); N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B 158, 295 (1979)

View on Pith 1978
[2]

A. O. Barvinski and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rep. 119 1 (1985), and references therein

View on Pith 1985
[6]

W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 25 942 (1982); D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 26 947 (1982); J. D. Bekenstein, Gen. Rel. Grav. 14 355 (1982); Phys. Rev. D 60 124010 (1999)

View on Pith 1982
[7]

R. Brustein and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5965

View on Pith 2000
[8]

R. Brustein, S. Foﬀa and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 507, (2001) 270 (hep-th/0101083)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[9]

D. Kutasov and F. Larsen, JHEP 0101 (2001), 001 (hep-th/0009244)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[10]

R. Brustein, D. Eichler, S. Foﬀa and D. H. Oaknin, hep-th/0009 063

View on Pith
[11]

T. R. Taylor and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 213, 450 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[12]

M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 366 (1985); V. Kaplunovsky ibid. 55, 1033 (1985); R. Petronzio and G. Veneziano, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2, 707 (1987)

View on Pith 1985
[13]

E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 471, 135 (1996); T. Banks and M. Dine, hep-th/9605136

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[14]

R. Brustein and S. P. de Alwis, Phys. Rev. Lett 87 (2001) 231601

View on Pith 2001
[15]

T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. D 48 3436 (1993); T. Damour and A.M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 423, 532 (1994); Gen. Rel. Grav. 26, 1171 (1994)

View on Pith 1993
[16]

M. Gasperini, F. Piazza and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. D 65, 023508 (2002)

View on Pith 2002

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Taxonomy of Potentials in Asymptotic Limits
hep-th 2026-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The exponential decay rates of scalar field potentials in asymptotic limits of quantum gravity moduli spaces are shown to be lattice-valued, satisfying the same discrete classification as brane tensions.
Negative running of gravitational positivity
hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Non-minimal three-point interactions induce negative one-loop running of Wilson coefficients in gravitational EFTs, yet graviton loops generate positive IR contributions that dominate the bounds after smearing if the ...
Co-Scaling and Alignment of Electric and Magnetic Towers
hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Electric and magnetic BPS towers in 5d supergravity are conjectured to co-scale and align, and a new S-map is conjectured to characterize the magnetic infinity cone of a Calabi-Yau threefold.
EFT & Species Scale: Friends or foes?
hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A detailed one-loop derivation shows that the species scale can be computed consistently with infinite convergent towers of states, resolving an apparent tension between infinite towers and effective field theory.
Approximate Symmetries and Gravity
hep-th 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The authors propose a 'Swampland Symmetry Conjecture' requiring local symmetry-violating operators to act faster than thermal black holes, and show that the Weak Gravity Conjecture typically enforces this bound in gau...

Show 15 more citing papers

Kaluza-Klein tower thresholds and scheme dependence of the species scale
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

Leading KK-tower local corrections to four-derivative gravity are regulator-dependent EFT matching data, while log N terms are universal within proper-time cutoffs, so species-scale definitions match only parametrically.
GUT Color-Triplet Around the Corner: The Story of an Overlooked Lightness
hep-ph 2026-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Color-triplet Higgs partners can be light (TeV) in supersymmetric SO(10) GUTs due to Yukawa coupling suppression from supersymmetry breaking, leading to lifetimes from seconds to longer than the universe's age.
Background instability of quintessence model in light of entropy and distance conjecture
hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

An entropy comparison shows quintessence backgrounds with a finite event horizon are unstable, equating the trans-Planckian censorship bound with a species-entropy growth condition.
Inflationary Particle Production and the Swampland
hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Tower-induced corrections to inflationary observables scale as (H/Λsp)^{2+p} and are negligible whenever H≪Λsp.
Exploring amplitude criteria for weak gravity in electroweak theory
hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Requiring positivity of the forward-scattering quantity B^(2)(Λ) in an electroweak-like theory yields weak-gravity-type lower bounds on gauge and Yukawa couplings, plus a species bound.
Modification of the laws of gravity in the DGP model by the presence of a second DGP brane
hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a two-brane DGP model, the gravitational potential between sources on different branes is controlled by a new scale ρ=√(rc R), producing weaker-than-5D gravity and a distance-independent force for R≪r≪ρ.
Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC
hep-th 2007-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A large number of gravitationally coupled particle species lowers the quantum gravity scale to about M_Planck/sqrt(N), and micro black holes retain a fading memory of the species that made them, so LHC black holes dec...
Quantum Gravity Cutoff from Axions: A Type IIB Landscape Study
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

The bound Λ_QG ≲ 2π √S f holds for C2 and C4 axions in Type IIB Calabi-Yau compactifications even near Kähler moduli space boundaries where co-scaling fails.
UV Effects and Short-Lived Hawking Radiation: Alternative Resolution of Information Paradox
hep-th 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Hawking radiation terminates around the scrambling time due to trans-Planckian stringy effects in GUP and string-field-theory-inspired toy models, yielding negligible evaporation and a mostly classical black hole.
The asymptotic dS Swampland Conjecture - a simplified derivation and a potential loophole
hep-th 2018-10 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

The species bound plus the distance conjecture force an exponentially falling scalar potential at large field values, but an oscillating prefactor shows this bound alone does not forbid de Sitter minima.
Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics
hep-th 2023-05 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

The notes synthesize flux compactification and Swampland arguments indicating that controlled string vacua may not achieve either small extra dimensions in AdS or parametric control in dS.
TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics
hep-ph 2023-04 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Axion couplings to gauge fields are quantized in integer units of 1/(8 pi squared), and that fact, combined with the expected absence of global symmetries in quantum gravity, organizes the Strong CP problem and axion ...
The Weak Gravity Conjecture: A Review
hep-th 2022-01 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

The Weak Gravity Conjecture and its stronger tower and sublattice forms hold in every consistent quantum gravity theory examined so far, but none of them has been derived from first principles.
Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics
hep-th 2022-03 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

A survey arguing that UV principles such as unitarity, causality, and quantum gravity conjectures sharply constrain the Wilson coefficients of low-energy effective field theories, with applications to the Standard Mod...
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
hep-th 2019-03 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

The review organizes the Swampland conjectures, from the Weak Gravity Conjecture to the de Sitter conjecture, and assesses the string-theory and black-hole evidence for each.

How later papers used it

71 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 69 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 7 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 13 of the 95 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 cited it as support.

Cites it as support 1 of 4 papers with this label

Said that its own result also agrees with perturbative arguments by Veneziano in this paper.

Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC (2007) · 0.96 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

72 arXiv papers cite this in 96 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 70 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 3 papers

This is a powerful claim, as currently the best that we can say from general principles is that $Λ_QG ≲M_Pl/√(N_SM)$ where $N_SM$ is the number of weakly-coupled fields in the Standard Model [ref] .

Extra-Dimensional Axion Expectations · Introduction and Summary · 0.93
In this section, we compare the bounds obtained in the previous section with Swampland conjectures, especially with the WGC [ref] and the species bound [ref] .

Exploring amplitude criteria for weak gravity in electroweak theory · Comparison with swampland conjectures · 0.99
Finally we also find a bound on the number of fields, $N$, in a simplistic multiple field example which agrees completely with recent bounds from renormalization of the Planck mass [ref] and from black hole physics [ref] applied in de Sitter space [ref] .

Simple Bounds from the Perturbative Regime of Inflation · Introduction · 0.97

Cites it as support 4 papers

[As a matter of fact, consistency with unitarity and causality is an obstacle as well for any BGR deformation of phenomenological relevance above the $μ$m, in particular if it involves higher-order terms in the curvature [ref] .] Indeed, since the sizes of both the scalar-GB and of the axion-CS operators are chosen in such a way to follow the tree-level NDA, it appears difficult for loop-level effects in the UV physics to restore causality, unless the number of species scales as $(4 π/g)^2 ∼(4 π/Λ)^2$ [ref] .

Causality Constraints on Black Holes beyond GR · Summary and Outlook · 0.96
There also exist perturbative arguments supporting ([ref]) (see, e.g., [ref] ).

Quantum Gravity in Species Regime · Species and Scale of Quantum Gravity · 0.97
This also agrees with perturbative arguments by Veneziano [ref] .

Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 14 papers

Consistent quantum field theories (QFTs) may also be constrained by rather different bounds relating to the total number of particle species [ref] or the relative strength of the gravitational force [ref] .

A Species or Weak-Gravity Bound for Large $N$ Gauge Theories Coupled to Gravity · Introduction · 0.85
The bound ([ref]) has appeared previously in several contexts [ref] , [ref] , [ref] .

A bound on the effective gravitational coupling from semiclassical black holes · Introduction · 0.95
In recent years, we have however learned that, for gravitational effective field theories (EFTs) with a large number $N_s$ of light species, a more natural UV cut-off is the species scale [ref] (see also [ref] for earlier works), a renormalization of the Planck mass, which is given by[In $d$ dimensions, this formula has a simple generalization via the substitution $√(N_s)→N_s^1/d-2$ and by considering $M_P$ as the $d$-dimensional reduced Planck mass.] [equation] Above the species scale, gravity becomes strongly coupled and no effective description, with such a number of light particles, is thus possible.

Species Scale and Primordial Gravitational Waves · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [5]

E. Kohlprath and G. Veneziano, in preparation

View on Pith

[2] [17]

T. Damour, F. Piazza and G. Veneziano, to appear. 7

View on Pith

[3] [3]

E. T. Tomboulis, in Highlights in Gravitation and Cosmology , Proceedings of Goa Con- ference, Goa, India (1987), p. 132

View on Pith 1987

[4] [4]

T. Jacobson, gr-qc/9404039; L. Susskind and Uglum , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2700 (hep-th/9401070); V. Frolov, D. Fursaev and A. I. Zelnikov, Nucl. Phys. B 486 (1997) 6 339 (hep-th/9607104); S. Hawking, J. Maldacena and A. Stroming er, JHEP 0105 (2001) 001 (hep-th/0002145)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[5] [1]

L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B 136, 115 (1978); N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B 158, 295 (1979)

View on Pith 1978

[6] [2]

A. O. Barvinski and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Rep. 119 1 (1985), and references therein

View on Pith 1985

[7] [6]

W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 25 942 (1982); D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 26 947 (1982); J. D. Bekenstein, Gen. Rel. Grav. 14 355 (1982); Phys. Rev. D 60 124010 (1999)

View on Pith 1982

[8] [7]

R. Brustein and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5965

View on Pith 2000

[9] [8]

R. Brustein, S. Foﬀa and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 507, (2001) 270 (hep-th/0101083)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[10] [9]

D. Kutasov and F. Larsen, JHEP 0101 (2001), 001 (hep-th/0009244)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[11] [10]

R. Brustein, D. Eichler, S. Foﬀa and D. H. Oaknin, hep-th/0009 063

View on Pith

[12] [11]

T. R. Taylor and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 213, 450 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[13] [12]

M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 366 (1985); V. Kaplunovsky ibid. 55, 1033 (1985); R. Petronzio and G. Veneziano, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2, 707 (1987)

View on Pith 1985

[14] [13]

E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 471, 135 (1996); T. Banks and M. Dine, hep-th/9605136

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[15] [14]

R. Brustein and S. P. de Alwis, Phys. Rev. Lett 87 (2001) 231601

View on Pith 2001

[16] [15]

T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. D 48 3436 (1993); T. Damour and A.M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 423, 532 (1994); Gen. Rel. Grav. 26, 1171 (1994)

View on Pith 1993

[17] [16]

M. Gasperini, F. Piazza and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. D 65, 023508 (2002)

View on Pith 2002