Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 13 Sep 2002 · 53 references

Pith's verdict: A genuine landmark: the first complete classification of supersymmetric solutions of a higher-dimensional supergravity, with the local-to-global caveat acknowledged and standard.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 10 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0209114 (version 3)
Pith IDC6R4Y65J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristopher M. Hull, Harvey S. Reall, Jan B. Gutowski, Jerome P. Gauntlett, Stathis Pakis. "All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions." arXiv:hep-th/0209114 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/C6R4Y65J
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

The paper claims that every purely bosonic supersymmetric solution of minimal five-dimensional supergravity belongs to one of two explicitly described families, timelike or null, and that each family preserves at least half the supersymmetr

The reading

The paper sets out to classify every purely bosonic solution of minimal $N=1$ five-dimensional supergravity that admits at least one Killing spinor. The authors argue that the vector made from the spinor is either timelike or null, and that this split fixes the geometry in each case. In the timelike case the solution is built from a four-dimensional hyper-Kähler base, a function $f$, and a one-form $omega$ satisfying two equations; in the null case the general solution is a plane-fronted wave specified by three harmonic functions. The payoff is a constructive map from simple data to supersymmetric five-dimensional spacetimes, plus examples including a Gödel-like universe that uplifts to eleven dimensions with twenty supercharges.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the set of bilinear forms built from a commuting Killing spinor: a real scalar $f$, a real vector $V$, and three real two-forms $X^{(i)}$. Algebraic identities force $V$ to be timelike or null and make the $X^{(i)}$ into an anti-self-dual hyper-Kähler triple when $f$ is nonzero; differential identities then reduce the Killing spinor equation to the equations on $f$, $omega$, and the base metric. In the null case the same bilinears make the transverse three-space flat and force the spinor to be constant, leaving a plane-fronted wave. The paper also recasts the split as an $SU(2)$ structure in the timelike case and an $R^3$ structure in the null case.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that minimal five-dimensional supergravity has no supersymmetric bosonic solutions outside two families. If the spinor bilinear $V$ is timelike, the metric can be written $ds^2=f^2(dt+omega)^2-f^{-1}h_{mn}dx^m dx^n$ with a hyper-Kähler base metric $h$, a function $f$, and a one-form $omega$ satisfying $f d omega=G_+ + G_-$, $dG_+=0$, and $Delta f^{-1}=frac{4}{9}(G_+)^2$. If $V$ is null, the general solution is a plane-fronted wave specified by three $u$-dependent harmonic functions $H$, $K$, and $F_0$. Both classes preserve at least half the supersymmetry, and the paper identifies the maximally supersymmetric cases, including flat space, $AdS_3 times S^2$, $AdS_2 times S^3$, the plane wave, the near-horizon BMPV geometry, and a Gödel-type universe.

Load-bearing premise

The timelike classification is derived only where $f$ is nonzero and is then extended to the whole spacetime by analytic continuation, so the global completeness of the classification at points where the Killing vector becomes null or the spinor vanishes is assumed rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every supersymmetric solution can be searched for by choosing a hyper-Kähler base and solving $dG_+=0$ and $Delta f^{-1}=frac{4}{9}(G_+)^2$, or by choosing three harmonic functions in the null case.
  • The null class contains the magnetic black string and $AdS_3 times S^2$ as boost-invariant special cases, so familiar static solutions sit inside the plane-fronted-wave family.
  • The timelike class contains the BMPV black hole with flat base and reduces, for Gibbons-Hawking bases, to four arbitrary harmonic functions on $R^3$.
  • Maximal supersymmetry is restricted to a short list of geometries, including flat space, $AdS_3 times S^2$, $AdS_2 times S^3$, the plane wave, near-horizon BMPV, and the Gödel-type solution.
  • The Gödel-type solution uplifts to eleven-dimensional supergravity with 20 supercharges, showing that exotic fractions of supersymmetry occur outside the plane-wave category.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification turns the search for new BPS backgrounds into a boundary-value problem on a hyper-Kähler manifold, which suggests numerical or constructive searches for regular asymptotically flat examples beyond BMPV.
  • Because closed timelike curves appear generically in the timelike examples, the result raises the question whether such supersymmetric backgrounds should be treated as physically admissible or as diagnostics of a dual description that resolves causality.
  • The 20-supercharge uplift hints that exotic supersymmetry fractions may be common in compactifications with rotating or Gödel-like geometries, not only in Penrose limits of plane waves.
  • The reduction of Gibbons-Hawking solutions to four-dimensional IWP metrics suggests that the five-dimensional classification can be used to organize and extend four-dimensional multi-black-hole solutions.
Original abstract

All purely bosonic supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions are classified. The solutions preserve either one half or all of the supersymmetry. Explicit examples of new solutions are given, including a large family of plane-fronted waves and a maximally supersymmetric analogue of the G\"odel universe which lifts to a solution of eleven dimensional supergravity that preserves 20 supersymmetries.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,947 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.38 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.84 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

All purely bosonic supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions are classified. The solutions preserve either one half or all of the supersymmetry. Explicit examples of new solutions are given, including a large family of plane-fronted waves and a maximally supersymmetric analogue of the G\"odel universe which lifts to a solution of eleven dimensional supergravity that preserves 20 supersymmetries.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 All purely bosonic supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five dimensions are classified. contribution 0.71 0.92 0.88 asserted 1.00
s1 The solutions preserve either one half or all of the supersymmetry. result 1.00 0.78 0.15 asserted 1.00
s2 Explicit examples of new solutions are given, including a large family of plane-fronted waves and a maximally supersymmetric analogue of the G\"odel universe which lifts to a solution of eleven dimensional supergravity that preserves 20 supersymmetries. contribution 0.61 0.93 0.14 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References
How later papers used it

174 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 164 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 30 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 23 of the 416 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Builds on it 1 of 2 papers with this label
Uses its method or tool 5 of 17 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

160 arXiv papers cite this in 395 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 252 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • The first detailed analysis of the BPS equations was done in [ref] , however this first work was incomplete in that it missed a major, and essential simplification that was subsequently discovered in [ref] .

    Lectures on Microstate Geometries · The BPS equations · contest 0.76

Builds on it 2 papers
Uses its method or tool 15 papers
  • In the present paper we use the construction described by Gauntlett et al. in Ref. [ref] using the Atiyah-Hitchin metric as our hyper-Kähler base space.

    Supergravity on an Atiyah-Hitchin Base · Introduction · 0.93

  • The strategy of [ref] , to which we refer for a deeper analysis (see also [ref] ), consists in reducing necessary and sufficient conditions for supersymmetry to a set of equations that will allow us to determine all the functions appearing in the metric.

    Rotating black holes with Nil or SL(2,$\,\mathbb{R}$) horizons · $N=2$, $D=5$ minimal gauged supergravity · 0.93

  • One can now use various Fierz identities [ref] to derive a projection obeyed by the Killing spinor V^μ_μϵ= -f ϵ , where $f = √(V^μV_μ)$.

    String Theory Effects on Five-Dimensional Black Hole Physics · Isometries and projections on Killing spinors · 0.89

Compares with it 15 papers
  • A simple way to understand this is to recall that all $N=2$ supersymmetric solutions in the class [ref] have (in our conventions) anti-self-dual fields on a hyper-Kähler base, while our solutions have both anti-self-dual and self-dual fields.

    Camouflaged Supersymmetry · Introduction · 0.84

  • Observe that in the limit of zero cosmological constant, the solutions ([ref])-([ref]) become a subset of the supersymmetric solutions of the ungauged theory [ref] , namely those with a timelike Killing vector field and $G^+=0$ (in the notation therein).

    HKT Geometry and de Sitter Supergravity · Solutions with conformally hyper-Kähler base · 0.92

  • In the $D = 5$ case, the solution coincides with the extremal charged Kaluza-Klein black hole solution [ref] .

    Extremal Charged Black Holes with a Twisted Extra Dimension · Summary and discussions · 0.88

Cites it as support 3 papers
  • Since solutions with $G^-=0$ are shown to be inevitably static [ref] , we shall henceforth concentrate on the solutions with $G^-0$.

    Black hole solutions in string theory · Timelike family · 0.99

  • First, because such solutions are shown to exist for any relative value of the horizon and asymptotic M-theory radii [ref] , and can be moreover easily analyzed.

    Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions · The two-derivative analysis · 0.98

  • This has been proven for many supergravity theories coupled to matter, and, in particular, for $M$-theory (see, for example, [ref] ).

    Lectures on Microstate Geometries · Some general observations about the supersymmetric solution · 0.96

Cites it as background 77 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.