RECORD
Nongeometry, Duality Twists, and the Worldsheet
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 11 Nov 2005
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We argue that generic nongeometric backgrounds arising from duality twists will not have simple orbifold constructions and then proceed to construct several examples which do have a consistent worldsheet description.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this paper, we use orbifold methods to construct nongeometric backgrounds, and argue that they correspond to the spacetimes discussed in \cite{dh,wwf}. More precisely, we make explicit through several examples the connection between interpolating orbifolds and spacetime duality twists. We argue that generic nongeometric backgrounds arising from duality twists will not have simple orbifold constructions and then proceed to construct several examples which do have a consistent worldsheet description.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this paper, we use orbifold methods to construct nongeometric backgrounds, and argue that they correspond to the spacetimes discussed in \cite{dh,wwf}. | contribution 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.38 | asserted 0.81 |
| s1 | More precisely, we make explicit through several examples the connection between interpolating orbifolds and spacetime duality twists. | contribution 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.19 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We argue that generic nongeometric backgrounds arising from duality twists will not have simple orbifold constructions and then proceed to construct several examples which do have a consistent worldsheet description. | contribution 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.35 | asserted 0.84 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this paper, we use orbifold methods to construct nongeometric backgrounds, and argue that they correspond to the spacetimes discussed in \cite{dh,wwf}. More precisely, we make explicit through several examples the connection between interpolating orbifolds and spacetime duality twists. We argue that generic nongeometric backgrounds arising from duality twists will not have simple orbifold constructions and then proceed to construct several examples which do have a consistent worldsheet description.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
9 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences
Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
Evidence for the existence of such backgrounds has been produced and explicit CFT constructions, describing interpolating orbifold limits of these backgrounds, have been constructed [ref] .
Flux compactifications, twisted tori and doubled geometry · Doubled geometry · 0.97
Cites it as background 5 papers
-
More recently, non-geometric backgrounds have been investigated via field redefinitions for the ten-dimensional supergravity action in [ref] , and have been analyzed from a world-sheet point of view for instance in [ref] .
On T-duality transformations for the three-sphere · Introduction · 0.98
-
There is a somewhat simpler example of a $T^2$ fibered over $S^1$ [ref] and in fact in the latter of these papers, the authors have succeeded in finding a modular invariant worldsheet CFT which describes this background.
Non-geometric String Backgrounds and Worldsheet Algebras · Introduction · 0.85
-
By now, several models of T-folds have been analysed using CFT [ref] .
Mirrorfolds with K3 Fibrations · Introduction and Summary · 0.85
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.