Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity and its reconstruction

M. Sami; Sergei D. Odintsov; Shin'ichi Nojiri

REVIEW

Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity and its reconstruction

Shin'ichi Nojiri, Sergei D. Odintsov, M. Sami

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 3 May 2006 · 27 references

Pith's verdict: A competent extension of the authors' own scalar-Gauss-Bonnet program; the reconstruction machinery is the durable part, the 'string-inspired dark energy' claim is model-building with a freely tuned coupling.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 12 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0605039 (version 3)

Pith IDMPHVJQYU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationM. Sami, Sergei D. Odintsov, Shin'ichi Nojiri. "Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity and its reconstruction." arXiv:hep-th/0605039 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/MPHVJQYU

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Worth your time if you work on modified-gravity dark energy, but read it for the reconstruction section, not the observational claim. The genuinely new pieces are: the third-order curvature term ξ2 L_c^(2) added to the dark energy solution and its stability analysis (Section II), the extension of the authors' reconstruction method from Ref. [16] to scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity (Section III.A, Eqs. 57 and 67), and the classical reduction to F(G) gravity including the third-order term (Section III.B). The reconstruction formulas are clean, explicit, and reusable — that is the part I would actually cite. The worked examples (oscillating scale factor, the H0 − H1 tanh H0t model, the exponential-coupling case that reproduces Ref. [10] in the g0 = 0 limit) are done properly and the F(G) check against Eq. (26) of Ref. [26] is a real consistency test, not decoration. Credit where due: the paper is honest that the reconstruction is circular by construction — you pick the cosmology, the potentials follow. That is the method, not a flaw, and they say so. Where I part company with the reader is on how much weight to put on the naturalness issue. It is real. Eq. (23) needs ξ2 = 1/(8H0^4), which in Planck units is ~10^244, while the paper's own string parametrization (Eq. 22) ties ξ2 to α'^2 with c2 ∈ {0, 1/8}. The paper treats ξ1^(0) and ξ2^(0) as independent in Eqs. (38)-(39), so Table I is a family of non-string couplings wearing a string label. The authors half-anticipate this in Section II.A with the 'different faces at different epochs' paragraph, but they never quantify the hierarchy. That is the soft spot, and it is a soft spot about interpretation, not about the existence claim. Two smaller things: the stability conclusion rests on pure-imaginary eigenvalues in the large-h0 limit, which is marginal rather than strictly stable, and the numerical verification is asserted with no artifacts. And there are typos that matter — Section II.E says the Ref. [10] solution 'was shown to be stable when h0 > 0 but unstable for h0 > 0', which is self-contradictory, and '5 < h0 < −667' is garbled. Send it out. The reconstruction section earns referee time even if the dark energy claim gets cut down.

Referee report

Major objections (4)

[Section II.B, Eqs. (22)-(23) and (38)-(39)] Eq. (23) requires ξ2 = 1/(8H0^4) ≈ 10^244 M_Pl^-4 at the present epoch. Eq. (22) ties ξ2 to α'^2 e^{4φ/φ0} with c2 ∈ {0, 1/8} fixed by string type. The paper never checks whether the required magnitude is compatible with a string-scale α', and in Eqs. (38)-(39) it treats ξ1^(0) and ξ2^(0) as independent free coefficients. The 'one-parameter family' of Table I is therefore a family of non-string couplings unless the dilaton exponent or α' is tuned. The authors acknowledge in Section II.A that the theory is an effective theory with 'different faces at different epochs', but they do not quantify the hierarchy. Please either exhibit a string-scale choice of α' and φ/φ0 that yields the required ξ2, or state explicitly that ξ1 and ξ2 are phenomenological couplings and that the 'string-inspired' label is motivational.
[Section II.E, Eq. (49)] For h0 > 0 the eigenvalues λ± = ±|h0|√(-h0/φ0)/√40 are purely imaginary. Purely imaginary eigenvalues of the linearized system indicate marginal (center) stability, not asymptotic stability; the nonlinear terms decide. The conclusion in Section IV that 'the non-phantom dark energy solution ... is stable' is therefore stronger than the analysis supports. The paper mentions a numerical verification but does not show it. Please either soften the claim to 'consistent with stability at linear order' or present the numerical evidence (or a second-order/nonlinear argument) that the solution is genuinely stable.
[Section II.C, Eqs. (23), (30), (32)] The de Sitter fixed point is quoted inconsistently. Eq. (23) gives H = (1/(8ξ2))^{1/4} ≈ 0.59 for ξ2 = 1, and the text itself says 'H = 0.6'. Eq. (32) then quotes xc = 0.71. Moreover, setting ˙x = ˙y = 0 in Eq. (30) as written gives x^4 = 3/456, i.e. xc ≈ 0.28. These three values should agree. Since the stability analysis of Section II.C is built on this fixed point, please check the sign and normalization of the 216x^2I^2 term in Eq. (30) against Eq. (19), and correct Eq. (30) or Eq. (32) accordingly.
[Section II.D, Eq. (35)] For the second branch H = h0/(ts-t) with h0 < 0, one has ˙H = h0/(ts-t)^2 < 0 and hence w_eff = -1 - 2˙H/(3H^2) > -1, i.e. quintessence, not phantom. The quoted w_eff = -1 + 2/(3h0) < -1 corresponds to the first branch H = h0/t with h0 < 0, which is a contracting background (H < 0). Please clarify the sign conventions and state whether the phantom solution is intended to describe an expanding universe; if so, the time-reversed branch should be written explicitly.

Minor objections (12)

[Eq. (33)] The third equation reads '˙δx = -3xc(1+w)δz'; it should be '˙δz'.
[Section II.C] The term 'unstable node' is not the right description for a fixed point with one positive and one negative eigenvalue; 'saddle' is more accurate.
[Section IV] The sentence 'was shown to be stable when h0 > 0 but unstable for h0 > 0' repeats the same condition; the second occurrence should be h0 < 0.
[Eq. (68)] The normalization a0 = g0/ρ0 appears inconsistent with the matter term (1+wm)g0 e^{-3(1+wm)g} in Eq. (67); please check the definition of g0.
[Section II.D] The statement 'for other couplings such a solution does not exist' should be justified or softened, since it is a strong uniqueness claim about the exponential ansatz.
[Section II.E] The numerical verification mentioned at the end of the section should be shown or described, since it is the only support for stability away from the large-h0 limit.
[Section III.A] The reconstructed potentials in Eqs. (71), (73), (79), (87) should be checked for reality and finiteness over the relevant field range, and any singular or imaginary branches should be noted.
[Section III.B] The branch choice in Eqs. (108)-(109) should be specified, since the cube-root expression for Y is multi-valued.
[Abstract and Section IV] The phrase 'consistent with recent observations' should be qualified as accommodation via parameter choice rather than prediction, to match the actual logic of Section II.D.
[Section II.A] The discussion of ghosts should be made more quantitative, e.g. by estimating the ghost mass scale and the cutoff at which the effective theory breaks down.
[Section IV] The timescale of the phantom instability should be estimated, since an unstable phantom solution may not be cosmologically viable even if it exists.
[Figs. 2 and 3] The axes labels and units should be clarified, and the plotted ranges should be tied explicitly to the allowed intervals quoted in Table I.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

String-theory curvature corrections can supply the dark energy that accelerates the universe today, and the same framework can be run backwards to reconstruct a gravity theory from any chosen cosmic history.

The reading

The paper asks whether the higher-order curvature terms that string theory adds to Einstein's gravity can account for the observed late-time acceleration of the universe, without invoking a cosmological constant or an exotic field with negative kinetic energy. Working with a scalar field (a dilaton) coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant and to a third-order curvature combination, the authors find an exact solution in which the Hubble rate falls as $h_0/t$ and the effective equation of state is $w_{eff} = -1 + 2/(3h_0)$; choosing $h_0$ positive gives quintessence, and choosing it negative gives a phantom phase with $w < -1$ while the scalar keeps a normal, positive kinetic term. They then compare the free parameter of the solution, $h_0$, against the then-current WMAP-plus-supernova bound on the dark energy equation of state and show that ranges of the dilaton normalization $h_0$ and $h_0$ reproduce the quoted values for both the non-phantom and phantom branches. The second half of the paper turns the logic around: for any prescribed cosmology $H = g'(t)$, it writes down the scalar potential and the Gauss-Bonnet coupling that realize it, giving explicit reconstructed potentials for quintessence, de Sitter, phantom, and oscillating scale factors, and shows that in a limit where the scalar becomes auxiliary the same theory is a modified $F(G)$ gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the pairing of a scalar field with the Gauss-Bonnet invariant $G = R_{abcd}R^{abcd} - 4R_{ab}R^{ab} + R^2$ through a coupling $h_0(phi)$. A constant $h_0$ makes the Gauss-Bonnet contribution cancel out of the equations of motion entirely, so the correction only bites when the field evolves; that is why the authors look for power-law solutions with logarithmically running $h_0$. The second device is the reconstruction map: writing the cosmic time as $t = f(phi)$ and the logarithm of the scale factor as $g(t)$, they give closed integrals for $V(phi)$ and $h_0(phi)$ such that any chosen $H(t)$ is a solution, which converts 'does this theory allow this cosmology?' into a straightforward integral. The third device is the auxiliary-field limit, in which the scalar is frozen to a function of $G$ and the action collapses to $R/2h_0 - F(G)$, tying the construction to a no-scalar modified gravity.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the string-inspired action combining the Einstein-Hilbert term with a dilaton-coupled Gauss-Bonnet term $L_c^{(1)}$ and a third-order curvature term $L_c^{(2)}$ admits a dark energy solution of the form $H = h_0/t$, $h_0 = h_0 h_0 t/t_1$, whose effective equation of state is $w_{eff} = -1 + 2/(3h_0)$. Because $h_0$ can be positive or negative, the same canonical scalar field covers quintessence, a cosmological-constant-like phase, and a phantom phase with $w < -1$; the phantom branch is reached without a wrong-sign kinetic term, which is the paper's main selling point against ghost-based phantom models. The authors show that the couplings required by this solution are exactly of the string form $h_0 e^{2h_0/h_0}$ and $h_0 e^{4h_0/h_0}$, that the third-order term widens the allowed range of $h_0^2$ so that the observed $w_{DE}$ can be matched for both branches, and that the non-phantom solution is stable under linear perturbations in the large-$h_0$ limit while the phantom solution is not. A separate de Sitter solution exists for constant $h_0$ and is shown to be an unstable node.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the string curvature couplings, which are suppressed by the string scale, can be large enough at the present epoch to drive the observed acceleration, and the paper normalizes the third-order coupling to one without discussing that hierarchy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any expansion history, including a transition from deceleration to acceleration or a crossing between the phantom and non-phantom regimes, can be realized by some choice of scalar potential and Gauss-Bonnet coupling, so the theory is not predictive at the level of the background cosmology alone.
A phantom equation of state $w < -1$ is available without a ghost field, which removes one common objection to phantom dark energy but shifts the burden onto the stability of the solution.
The reconstructed scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory can be rewritten as an $F(G)$ gravity in the limit where the scalar becomes auxiliary, so cosmological solutions found in one description carry over to the other with a different physical interpretation.
Including the third-order curvature term loosens the relation between the equation-of-state parameter and the dilaton normalization, giving a one-parameter family of models that can sit inside the observed dark energy bounds.
The authors' own linear stability analysis finds the non-phantom branch stable and the phantom branch unstable, so a viable phantom phase in this framework would require going beyond the background solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's strongest structural point is a degeneracy: because the reconstruction integrals exist for essentially any $H(t)$, agreement with the observed $w_{DE}$ is not by itself evidence for string curvature corrections, and a discriminating test has to come from the perturbation sector or from an independent handle on the size of the couplings.
The stability result splits the two branches cleanly: if the dark energy is confirmed to sit stably below $w = -1$, this class of solutions does not cover it without additional structure, which is a sharper prediction than the background fit suggests.
The Gauss-Bonnet coupling required here is of order the Hubble scale to the inverse fourth power, so the natural question the paper leaves open is why a correction suppressed by the string scale would be appreciable at the present epoch rather than astronomically small; that hierarchy, not the algebra, is where the model lives or dies.
Because the Gauss-Bonnet term modifies the propagation of gravitational waves relative to light, a measurement of the tensor-to-scalar propagation speed at low redshift would probe the same coupling that drives the acceleration here.

Original abstract

In this paper we investigate the cosmological effects of modified gravity with string curvature corrections added to Einstein-Hilbert action in the presence of a dynamically evolving scalar field coupled to Riemann invariants. The scenario exhibits several features of cosmological interest for late universe. It is shown that higher order stringy corrections can lead to a class of dark energy models consistent with recent observations. The model can give rise to quintessence, deSitter or phantom dark energy, in last case without recourse to negative kinetic energy field. The detailed treatment of reconstruction program for general scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is presented for any given cosmology. The explicit examples of reconstructed scalar potentials are given for accelerated (quintessence, cosmological constant or phantom) universe. Finally, the relation with modified $F(G)$ gravity is established on classical level and is extended to include third order terms on curvature.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,510 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.16 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

In this paper we investigate the cosmological effects of modified gravity with string curvature corrections added to Einstein-Hilbert action in the presence of a dynamically evolving scalar field coupled to Riemann invariants. The scenario exhibits several features of cosmological interest for late universe. It is shown that higher order stringy corrections can lead to a class of dark energy models consistent with recent observations. The model can give rise to quintessence, deSitter or phantom dark energy, in last case without recourse to negative kinetic energy field. The detailed treatment of reconstruction program for general scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is presented for any given cosmology. The explicit examples of reconstructed scalar potentials are given for accelerated (quintessence, cosmological constant or phantom) universe. Finally, the relation with modified $F(G)$ gravity is established on classical level and is extended to include third order terms on curvature.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	In this paper we investigate the cosmological effects of modified gravity with string curvature corrections added to Einstein-Hilbert action in the presence of a dynamically evolving scalar field coupled to Riemann invariants.	contribution 0.98	0.78	0.07	asserted 0.71
s1	The scenario exhibits several features of cosmological interest for late universe.	result 0.57	0.55	0.05	asserted 0.96
s2	It is shown that higher order stringy corrections can lead to a class of dark energy models consistent with recent observations.	result 0.99	0.85	0.62	asserted 0.64
s3	The model can give rise to quintessence, deSitter or phantom dark energy, in last case without recourse to negative kinetic energy field.	result 0.97	0.81	0.25	hedged possibility 0.71
s4	The detailed treatment of reconstruction program for general scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity is presented for any given cosmology.	contribution 0.73	0.90	0.08	asserted 1.00
s5	The explicit examples of reconstructed scalar potentials are given for accelerated (quintessence, cosmological constant or phantom) universe.	contribution 0.78	0.91	0.10	asserted 1.00
s6	Finally, the relation with modified $F(G)$ gravity is established on classical level and is extended to include third order terms on curvature.	contribution 0.89	0.87	0.13	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1: Plot of the first eigenvalue

Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-th/0605039 by the authors.

References

Works cited (27)

[16]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:hep-th/0506212; S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 63 2, 597 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0507182]; S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B634, 93 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0512118]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[10]

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 71, 123509 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504052]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[26]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B631, 1 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0508049]; G. Cognola, E. Elizalde , S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 73, 084007 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601008]; S. Nojiri, S. D. Od intsov and O. G. Gorbunova, J. Phys. A (2006), [arXiv:hep-th/0510183]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[1]

A. Riess, et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[2]

S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

View on Pith 1999
[3]

N. Straumann, arXiv:hep-ph/0604231

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[4]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, arXiv:hep-th/0 603057

View on Pith
[5]

T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept. 380, 235 (2003)

View on Pith 2003
[6]

J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003)

View on Pith 2003
[7]

L. Perivolaropoulos, arXiv:astro-ph/0601014

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[8]

D. J. Eisenstein et al. , Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[9]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:hep-th/0601213

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[11]

M. Sami, A. Toporensky, P. V. Tretjakov and S. Tsujikawa , Phys. Lett. B 619, 193 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504154]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[12]

T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, arXiv: astro-ph/0606078

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

G. Calcagni, S. Tsujikawa and M. Sami, Class. Quant. Gra v. 22, 3977 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505193]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[14]

I. Antoniadis, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, Nucl. Phys. B 415, 497 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9305025]; N. E. Mavromatos and J. Rizos, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124004 (2000); JHEP 0207, 045 (2002); Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 57 (2003)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[15]

M. Dehghani and M. Shamirzaie, arXiv:hep-th/0506227; M. H. Dehghani and R. B. Mann, arXiv:hep-th/0602243; T. Rizz o, arXiv:hep-ph/0601029

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[17]

V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 70,044037 (2004); Ann. Phys. 317, 366 (2005)

View on Pith 2004
[18]

G. Calcagni, B. de Carlos and A. De Felice, arXiv:hep-th /0604201; A. De Felice, M. Hindmarsh and M. Trodden, arXiv:astro-ph/0604154

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[19]

I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, Eﬀective Action in Quantum Gravity , IOP, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1992

View on Pith 1992
[20]

I. P. Neupane, arXiv:hep-th/0602097; I. P. Neupane, ar Xiv: hep-th/0605265

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[21]

B. M. N. Carter and I. P. Neupane, arXiv:hep-th/0512262

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[22]

D. N. Spergel et al. , arXiv:astro-ph.0603449

View on Pith
[23]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B (2006) arXiv: hep-th/0603062

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[24]

P. Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, arXiv:hep-th/0604 014; I. Ya. Aref’eva and A. S. Koshelev, arXiv:hep-th/06050 85; S. Srivastava, arXiv:hep-th/0605010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[25]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0307288]. 18

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[27]

S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and A. Troisi , arXiv:astro-ph/0604431

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests
astro-ph 2007-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A new class of f(R) gravity models evades solar-system tests via chameleon screening, so the binding constraint on such models comes from the galactic halo and the linear power spectrum, not from solar-system measurements.
Nonlinear reconstruction of general dark energy theories
astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A reconstruction method is derived that turns background expansion and linear perturbation data into full non-linear Lagrangians for quintessence, scalar-tensor, k-essence, and shift-symmetric cubic Galileon dark ener...
Towards Stochastic Inflation in Higher-Curvature Gravity
gr-qc 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Stochastic inflation with Gauss-Bonnet coupling to the inflaton yields first-passage-time estimates of the scalar power spectrum and PBH mass fraction in slow-roll and ultra-slow-roll limits.
Teleparallel quintessence with a nonminimal coupling to a boundary term
gr-qc 2015-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A scalar field coupled to the boundary term of teleparallel gravity produces a late-time de Sitter attractor for any positive coupling strength, without tuning the potential slope.
LambdaCDM epoch reconstruction from F(R,G) and modified Gauss-Bonnet gravities
gr-qc 2010-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity can be reverse-engineered to reproduce the LambdaCDM expansion history without a cosmological constant, though the reconstructed functions are chosen to fit and their physical viability i...

Show 17 more citing papers

Dynamics of Nonlocal Cosmology
gr-qc 2008-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Nonlocal corrections of the form f of the inverse d'Alembertian of the Ricci scalar, with Planck-scale coefficients, can drive late-time cosmic acceleration, but the simplest choices end in a sudden future singularity...
From Quantum Correlations to Inflationary Tracking Scalar Field Evolution
gr-qc 2026-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

The author argues, via condensed-matter-style analogies, that the inflationary tracking condition emerges when the correlation length of primordial quantum degrees of freedom scales as a power of the Hubble radius.
ACT-DR6 consistent inflation in generalised entropic cosmology and $f(Q)$ gravity
gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Reconstruction produces explicit f(Q) and generalised-entropic inflation models (and scalar-coupled versions) whose slow-roll parameters match ACT-DR6 + Planck-BAO constraints on n_s and r.
Reconstructing ACT-compatible and GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Inflation from the Observational Indices
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Four Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflationary models are reconstructed from a chosen tensor-to-scalar ratio and shown to satisfy ACT and GW170817 constraints including scalar perturbation amplitude.
GW170817 Viable Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Inflation Compatible with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data
gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflation models with tuned small couplings can reproduce the ACT scalar spectral index and the Planck tensor-to-scalar ratio bound while keeping the gravitational wave speed within the GW170817 limit.
Gauss-Bonnet-induced symmetry breaking/restoration during inflation
hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A Gauss-Bonnet coupling can flip a scalar field's effective mass sign during inflation, triggering symmetry breaking or restoration mid-inflation while leaving the inflationary background and its CMB predictions essen...
Primordial Gravitational Waves Predictions for GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
gr-qc 2022-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

For two GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models, the post-inflationary WKB amplification of the primordial gravitational-wave spectrum is negligible (D below 10^-59), leaving a blue-tilted tensor spectrum set...
A Refined Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Inflationary Theoretical Framework
gr-qc 2021-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Adding the assumption that κξ'/ξ'' is much less than one to slow-roll Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflation yields simple analytic observables, and a power-law coupling fits Planck data with a blue-tilted tensor spectrum.
Superbounce and Loop Quantum Ekpyrotic Cosmologies from Modified Gravity: $F(R)$, $F(G)$ and $F(T)$ Theories
gr-qc 2015-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Explicit F(R), F(G), and F(T) gravity forms are reconstructed that reproduce the superbounce and loop quantum ekpyrotic backgrounds, with linear stability holding conditionally or fully.
Future of the universe in modified gravitational theories: Approaching to the finite-time future singularity
hep-th 2008-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

By reverse-engineering the gravitational action from a chosen expansion history, the authors exhibit F(R), Gauss-Bonnet, and non-minimal Maxwell-Einstein models that end in each of the four known finite-time future si...
Modified gravity and its reconstruction from the universe expansion history
hep-th 2006-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Any desired cosmological expansion history can be reverse-engineered into a modified gravity action, including a matter era followed by acceleration.
Crossing the Phantom Divide: Theoretical Implications and Observational Status
astro-ph 2006-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Crossing the phantom divide w = -1 is theoretically cleanest in extended gravity, and current data favor it only mildly, mainly for the Gold supernova sample and for non-supernova probes when the matter density is ass...
Accelerating universe from F(T) gravity
gr-qc 2010-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

F(T) gravity can be reverse-engineered to reproduce any desired cosmological expansion history, including ΛCDM and accelerating phases, by choosing the function F(T) appropriately.
Reconstructing Dark Energy
astro-ph 2006-10 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Model-independent reconstruction of the cosmic expansion history from 2006-era data is consistent across parametric and non-parametric methods, and a plain cosmological constant still fits as well as any evolving dark energy.
Recent Advances on Inflation
gr-qc 2023-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

The paper reviews inflationary model building in modified gravity, collecting slow-roll formulas, viability conditions, and gravitational-wave predictions across f(R), Gauss-Bonnet, Chern-Simons, and related theories.
Some aspects of generalized modified gravity models
gr-qc 2013-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

F(R) and F(R,G) modified gravity can host black holes whose mass is the integration constant of the solution, can be shielded from future singularities by power-law curvature terms, and can drive both inflation and da...
Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models
gr-qc 2010-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

The paper reviews how arbitrary cosmic expansion histories can be reverse-engineered into modified-gravity actions, especially F(R) and related theories.

How later papers used it

79 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 49 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 3 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 11 of the 107 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 used its method or tool. 2 more papers by the same authors are listed: 2 used its method or tool.

Uses its method or tool 3 of 6 papers with this label · 2 by the same authors

Gave a general approach to reconstruct the scalar-tensor model with non-minimal and Gauss-Bonnet couplings for any given cosmological scenario, following this paper.

Dark Energy from Gauss-Bonnet and non-minimal couplings (2014) · 0.88 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

By the same authors

Introduced a reconstruction procedure based on the one developed in this paper and another work, then proposed a model to realize inflation, early dark energy and dark energy under the same mechanism.

Unifying inflation with early and late dark energy in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity (2023) (same authors) · 0.99 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
Considered how to construct the model realizing the spacetime with the metric for arbitrary a(t̃) based on this paper.

Propagation of Gravitational Waves in a Dynamical Wormhole Background for Two-scalar Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory (2023) (same authors) · 0.93 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting

How the literature uses it

47 arXiv papers cite this in 68 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 34 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 4 papers

In this section, firstly we introduce the reconstruction procedure based on the one developed in Refs. [ref] and [ref] , and then, we propose a model that might realize inflation, early dark energy, and dark energy under the same mechanism.

Unifying inflation with early and late dark energy in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity · Reconstructing a unified model that includes early Dark Energy · 0.99
Below we give a general approach to reconstruct the scalar-tensor model with non-minimal and GB couplings for any given cosmological scenario [ref] .

Dark Energy from Gauss-Bonnet and non-minimal couplings · The scalar-tensor model and field equations · 0.88
It proves convenient to use the well-known reconstruction technique from [ref] , which we briefly described in the previous section.

Superbounce and Loop Quantum Ekpyrotic Cosmologies from Modified Gravity: $F(R)$, $F(G)$ and $F(T)$ Theories · Superbounce Reconstruction from $F(G)$ Gravity · 1.00

Cites it as background 26 papers

A number of papers [ref] (see also Ref. [ref] ) are devoted to the possibility of having dark energy with a GB term and a dilaton/modulus field with non-trivial potential.

Dark energy generated from a (super)string effective action with higher order curvature corrections and a dynamical dilaton · Introduction · 0.89
Recently, however, the cosmology of models based on a class of generalised theories with an action of the form [equation] has been considered, where $f ()$ is a differentiable function of $$ and $S_m$ represents the matter action [ref] .

Cosmological scaling solutions in generalised Gauss-Bonnet gravity theories · Introduction · 0.88
The sEGB gravity theory [ref] is described by the following action, [equation] Here $V(ϕ)$ is the potential of a scalar field $ϕ$, $ξ(ϕ)$ is also a function of $ϕ$, and we denote the Lagrangian density of the matter by $ℒ_matter$.

Black holes, photon sphere, and cosmology in ghost-free $f(\mathcal{G})$ gravity · New ghost-free Einstein-$f(𝒢)$ gravity · 0.85

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [16]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:hep-th/0506212; S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 63 2, 597 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0507182]; S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B634, 93 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0512118]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[2] [10]

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 71, 123509 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504052]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[3] [26]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B631, 1 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0508049]; G. Cognola, E. Elizalde , S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 73, 084007 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601008]; S. Nojiri, S. D. Od intsov and O. G. Gorbunova, J. Phys. A (2006), [arXiv:hep-th/0510183]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[4] [1]

A. Riess, et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[5] [2]

S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

View on Pith 1999

[6] [3]

N. Straumann, arXiv:hep-ph/0604231

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[7] [4]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, arXiv:hep-th/0 603057

View on Pith

[8] [5]

T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept. 380, 235 (2003)

View on Pith 2003

[9] [6]

J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003)

View on Pith 2003

[10] [7]

L. Perivolaropoulos, arXiv:astro-ph/0601014

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[11] [8]

D. J. Eisenstein et al. , Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[12] [9]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:hep-th/0601213

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [11]

M. Sami, A. Toporensky, P. V. Tretjakov and S. Tsujikawa , Phys. Lett. B 619, 193 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0504154]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[14] [12]

T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, arXiv: astro-ph/0606078

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[15] [13]

G. Calcagni, S. Tsujikawa and M. Sami, Class. Quant. Gra v. 22, 3977 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505193]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[16] [14]

I. Antoniadis, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, Nucl. Phys. B 415, 497 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9305025]; N. E. Mavromatos and J. Rizos, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124004 (2000); JHEP 0207, 045 (2002); Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 57 (2003)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[17] [15]

M. Dehghani and M. Shamirzaie, arXiv:hep-th/0506227; M. H. Dehghani and R. B. Mann, arXiv:hep-th/0602243; T. Rizz o, arXiv:hep-ph/0601029

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[18] [17]

V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 70,044037 (2004); Ann. Phys. 317, 366 (2005)

View on Pith 2004

[19] [18]

G. Calcagni, B. de Carlos and A. De Felice, arXiv:hep-th /0604201; A. De Felice, M. Hindmarsh and M. Trodden, arXiv:astro-ph/0604154

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[20] [19]

I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, Eﬀective Action in Quantum Gravity , IOP, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1992

View on Pith 1992

[21] [20]

I. P. Neupane, arXiv:hep-th/0602097; I. P. Neupane, ar Xiv: hep-th/0605265

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [21]

B. M. N. Carter and I. P. Neupane, arXiv:hep-th/0512262

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[23] [22]

D. N. Spergel et al. , arXiv:astro-ph.0603449

View on Pith

[24] [23]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B (2006) arXiv: hep-th/0603062

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[25] [24]

P. Apostolopoulos and N. Tetradis, arXiv:hep-th/0604 014; I. Ya. Aref’eva and A. S. Koshelev, arXiv:hep-th/06050 85; S. Srivastava, arXiv:hep-th/0605010

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[26] [25]

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0307288]. 18

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[27] [27]

S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and A. Troisi , arXiv:astro-ph/0604431

View on Pith Pith review arXiv