RECORD
Emission of charged particles from four- and five-dimensional black holes
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 15 Aug 1996
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We show that the agreement continues to hold for charged scalar emission.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Recently Das and Mathur found that the leading order Hawking emission rate of neutral scalars by near-extremal $D=5$ black holes is exactly reproduced by a string theoretic model involving intersecting D-branes. We show that the agreement continues to hold for charged scalar emission. We further show that similar agreement can be obtained for a class of near-extremal $D=4$ black holes using a model inspired by M-theory. In this model, BPS saturated $D=4$ black holes with four charges are realized in M-theory as 5-branes triply intersecting over a string. The low-energy excitations are signals traveling on the intersection string.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Recently Das and Mathur found that the leading order Hawking emission rate of neutral scalars by near-extremal $D=5$ black holes is exactly reproduced by a string theoretic model involving intersecting D-branes. | background 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We show that the agreement continues to hold for charged scalar emission. | result 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.48 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We further show that similar agreement can be obtained for a class of near-extremal $D=4$ black holes using a model inspired by M-theory. | result 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.31 | asserted 0.93 |
| s3 | In this model, BPS saturated $D=4$ black holes with four charges are realized in M-theory as 5-branes triply intersecting over a string. | method 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The low-energy excitations are signals traveling on the intersection string. | method 0.86 | 0.37 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Recently Das and Mathur found that the leading order Hawking emission rate of neutral scalars by near-extremal $D=5$ black holes is exactly reproduced by a string theoretic model involving intersecting D-branes. We show that the agreement continues to hold for charged scalar emission. We further show that similar agreement can be obtained for a class of near-extremal $D=4$ black holes using a model inspired by M-theory. In this model, BPS saturated $D=4$ black holes with four charges are realized in M-theory as 5-branes triply intersecting over a string. The low-energy excitations are signals traveling on the intersection string.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences
Papers citing it
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
The logic essentially follows the effective string approach for calculating greybody factors of black holes [ref] .
The evaporation of charged black holes · Hawking radiation in JT gravity · 0.92
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
To name just a few examples, see [ref] .
Following the state of an evaporating charged black hole into the quantum gravity regime · Low energy effective theory · 0.80
-
The low-frequency scattering of massless minimal scalars off a classical black hole is a well-studied topic, initiated in [ref] and significantly developed in the years leading up to the AdS/CFT correspondence (e.g, [ref] ).
Quantum Cross-section of Near-extremal Black Holes · Introduction · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.