Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Naturally Small Cosmological Constant on the Brane?

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 21 Nov 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Furthermore, although the resulting cosmological constant in the scenarios we outline is naturally suppressed by weak coupling constants of gravitational strength, it need not be exactly zero, raising the possibility it could be in the range favoured by recent cosmological observations.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.82 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/9911164 (version 3)
Pith IDU7ZI3HIF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC.P. Burgess, F. Quevedo, R.C. Myers. "A Naturally Small Cosmological Constant on the Brane?." arXiv:hep-th/9911164 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/U7ZI3HIF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,408 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.73 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.25 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

There appears to be no natural explanation for the cosmological constant's small size within the framework of local relativistic field theories. We argue that the recently-discussed framework for which the observable universe is identified with a p-brane embedded within a higher-dimensional `bulk' spacetime, has special properties that may help circumvent the obstacles to this understanding. This possibility arises partly due to several unique features of the brane proposal. These are: (1) the potential such models introduce for partially breaking supersymmetry, (2) the possibility of having low-energy degrees of freedom which are not observable to us because they are physically located on a different brane, (3) the fundamental scale may be much smaller than the Planck scale. Furthermore, although the resulting cosmological constant in the scenarios we outline is naturally suppressed by weak coupling constants of gravitational strength, it need not be exactly zero, raising the possibility it could be in the range favoured by recent cosmological observations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 There appears to be no natural explanation for the cosmological constant's small size within the framework of local relativistic field theories. background 0.69 0.07 0.04 hedged possibility 0.66
s1 We argue that the recently-discussed framework for which the observable universe is identified with a p-brane embedded within a higher-dimensional `bulk' spacetime, has special properties that may help circumvent the obstacles to this understanding. contribution 0.96 0.30 0.22 hedged possibility 0.98
s2 This possibility arises partly due to several unique features of the brane proposal. contribution 0.50 0.15 0.04 hedged possibility 0.61
s3 These are: (1) the potential such models introduce for partially breaking supersymmetry, (2) the possibility of having low-energy degrees of freedom which are not observable to us because they are physically located on a different brane, (3) the fundamental scale may be much smaller than the Planck scale. contribution 0.51 0.11 0.06 hedged possibility 0.59
s4 Furthermore, although the resulting cosmological constant in the scenarios we outline is naturally suppressed by weak coupling constants of gravitational strength, it need not be exactly zero, raising the possibility it could be in the range favoured by recent cosmological observations. interpretation 0.63 0.71 0.72 hedged possibility 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.87 · evidence from argument 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

There appears to be no natural explanation for the cosmological constant's small size within the framework of local relativistic field theories. We argue that the recently-discussed framework for which the observable universe is identified with a p-brane embedded within a higher-dimensional `bulk' spacetime, has special properties that may help circumvent the obstacles to this understanding. This possibility arises partly due to several unique features of the brane proposal. These are: (1) the potential such models introduce for partially breaking supersymmetry, (2) the possibility of having low-energy degrees of freedom which are not observable to us because they are physically located on a different brane, (3) the fundamental scale may be much smaller than the Planck scale. Furthermore, although the resulting cosmological constant in the scenarios we outline is naturally suppressed by weak coupling constants of gravitational strength, it need not be exactly zero, raising the possibility it could be in the range favoured by recent cosmological observations.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 8 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.