Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Microlocal Analysis and Interacting Quantum Field Theories: Renormalization on Physical Backgrounds

Mathematical Physics · Submitted 12 Mar 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present a perturbative construction of interacting quantum field theories on any smooth globally hyperbolic manifold.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDmath-ph/9903028 (version 1)
Pith IDAIBSQ4C7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKlaus Fredenhagen, Romeo Brunetti. "Microlocal Analysis and Interacting Quantum Field Theories: Renormalization on Physical Backgrounds." arXiv:math-ph/9903028 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/AIBSQ4C7
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,045 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.24 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a perturbative construction of interacting quantum field theories on any smooth globally hyperbolic manifold. We develop a purely local version of the Stueckelberg-Bogoliubov-Epstein-Glaser method of renormalization using techniques from microlocal analysis. As byproducts, we describe a perturbative construction of local algebras of observables, present a new definition of Wick polynomials as operator-valued distributions on a natural domain, and we find a general method for the extension of distributions which were defined on the complement of some surfaces.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a perturbative construction of interacting quantum field theories on any smooth globally hyperbolic manifold. contribution 0.97 0.96 0.58 asserted 1.00
s1 We develop a purely local version of the Stueckelberg-Bogoliubov-Epstein-Glaser method of renormalization using techniques from microlocal analysis. method 0.69 0.95 0.15 asserted 1.00
s2 As byproducts, we describe a perturbative construction of local algebras of observables, present a new definition of Wick polynomials as operator-valued distributions on a natural domain, and we find a general method for the extension of distributions which were defined on the complement of some surfaces. contribution 0.67 0.96 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.75 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a perturbative construction of interacting quantum field theories on any smooth globally hyperbolic manifold. We develop a purely local version of the Stueckelberg-Bogoliubov-Epstein-Glaser method of renormalization using techniques from microlocal analysis. As byproducts, we describe a perturbative construction of local algebras of observables, present a new definition of Wick polynomials as operator-valued distributions on a natural domain, and we find a general method for the extension of distributions which were defined on the complement of some surfaces.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

67 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 66 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 20 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 23 of the 155 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its method or tool 4 of 16 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

56 arXiv papers cite this in 130 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 89 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
Uses its method or tool 13 papers
Cites it as support 3 papers
Cites it as background 17 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.