Causal Theories of Dissipative Relativistic Fluid Dynamics for Nuclear Collisions

Azwinndini Muronga

REVIEW

Causal Theories of Dissipative Relativistic Fluid Dynamics for Nuclear Collisions

Azwinndini Muronga

Nuclear Theory · Submitted 22 Sep 2003 · 55 references

Pith's verdict: A solid, mostly expository application of Israel–Stewart hydrodynamics whose genuinely new content is narrower than the abstract suggests, and whose one quantitative headline rests on a single tuned parameter.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 10 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDnucl-th/0309055 (version 2)

Pith IDIPQJAK4P, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationAzwinndini Muronga. "Causal Theories of Dissipative Relativistic Fluid Dynamics for Nuclear Collisions." arXiv:nucl-th/0309055 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/IPQJAK4P

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is Muronga's long paper on causal (Israel–Stewart) dissipative hydrodynamics in the Bjorken scaling limit. The honest summary: most of it is a careful expository run through equilibrium thermodynamics, the Eckart/Landau first-order theory, and the MIS second-order transport equations, all of which is standard and correctly transcribed. The new core is narrow but real — the explicit side-by-side numerical comparison of Euler, first-order, and second-order evolution for RHIC and LHC initial conditions, the pion-gas case, and the R0 ≥ 1 criterion (Eq. 157) for when Navier–Stokes is a defensible limit. The reduced ODEs (173–174, 181–182) are clean and reusable, and the demonstration that first-order theory produces a spurious early temperature rise and entropy peak while second-order does not is correct and consistent with Hiscock–Lindblom. That qualitative message is the paper's real value and it holds up. The R0 ≥ 1 condition is the most practically useful thing in here and deserves to be cited on its own. Where I'd push back is the abstract's 'good agreement with transport models' (abstract:s5). Fig. 9 is the only quantitative comparison, and Φ0 is fit to the same VNI points it is then compared against. The shape is predicted, not tuned — Fig. 7 shows the temperature evolution is insensitive to Φ0 below 0.1 p0 — so the circularity is narrower than it first looks. But Fig. 9 with Φ0 fixed independently, at 0.1 p0 say, is not shown, and that one panel would settle it. The authors do concede 'we cannot yet claim perfect agreement' and the 1+1D-hydro-versus-3D-cascade mismatch, so the body is more careful than the abstract. Second soft spot: Sections II–IV and much of V are textbook restatement; a reader after the new result should start at Section VI. Minor: the Fig. 10 caption gives τ0 = 0.22 fm/c where the text says 0.13, and the legend reads 'Perfect order'. Cosmetic, but fix them. This is for people starting viscous hydro for heavy-ion collisions — the ODEs and the R0 criterion are the citable bits. Worth a serious referee; expect revision on the abstract claim and the Fig. 9 sensitivity.

Referee report

Significance

The paper's durable value is the systematic side-by-side comparison of Euler, Navier–Stokes–Fourier and MIS evolution inside one common scaling framework, together with the explicit causality check (Figs. 1–2) and the derivation of the criterion R0 ≥ 1, Eq. (157), which delimits where the first-order laws are a legitimate limit of the extended theory. That criterion is a concrete, falsifiable statement about initial conditions and is the most useful result in the manuscript. The reduced ODEs (173)–(174) and (181)–(182) are stated completely enough to be reproduced, and the observation that the first-order temperature rise and entropy peak are artifacts of R0 < 1 rather than of the fluid itself is well taken. The headline claim of quantitative agreement with transport models is weaker than the abstract suggests, for the reasons given below.

Major objections (2)

[§VI.B, Fig. 9 and the sentence 'The fitted value of Φ0 is found to be about 0.2p0'] The agreement with VNI shown in Fig. 9 is obtained after fitting Φ0 to the same VNI energy-density points against which the curve is then compared, with αs also chosen (0.5 for RHIC, 0.4 for LHC). As it stands the reader cannot distinguish 'the second-order dynamics reproduces the cascade' from 'the second-order curve can be tuned through the cascade points', because the shape is dynamical but the normalization is fitted. The paper already has the tool to settle this: Fig. 7 shows that for Φ0 below about 0.1p0 the temperature evolution is insensitive to Φ0, and Eq. (169) bounds the physically admissible flux. Please add a version of Fig. 9 with Φ0 fixed independently of the VNI points, at least at Φ0 = 0.1p0 and at Φ0 = p0, and state whether the curve still tracks the cascade within the scatter of the points. Please also report how tightly the VNI points determine Φ0 (a χ² or an interval, not only a central value), and note in the abstract that the agreement is at the level of the power-law shape with one fitted normalization rather than a parameter-free prediction. The paper's own caveat that 'due to the preliminary nature of VNI results we cannot yet claim perfect agreement' is honest and should be carried into the abstract, which currently states 'good agreement with transport models' without qualification.
[Abstract, sentence 'First order theories fail in the early stages of evolution'; §VI.A, Eq. (157) and Fig. 6] The abstract states the failure of first-order theory unconditionally, but the paper itself shows that the failure is conditional on the initial conditions. Eq. (157) gives the criterion R0 ≥ 1, equivalently T0τ0 ≥ (1/3)(b/a), and the top panel of Fig. 6 (T0 = 300 MeV, τ0 = 1.0 fm/c) shows first-order theory tracking the perfect fluid closely, with no spurious rise. The failure in Figs. 10–11 arises because the uncertainty-principle prescription τ0 ≈ 1/(3T0) forces R0 < 1. This is a real and interesting result, but as written the abstract claim is contradicted by the manuscript's own Fig. 6. Please attach the R0 < 1 condition to the abstract statement and to the corresponding sentence in §VI.A, so that the claim reads as a statement about the domain of validity of the first-order laws rather than about the laws themselves.

Minor objections (10)

[§VI.C, Eq. (184)] The sign of the logarithm appears to be wrong. As printed, the bracket {1 + f_η/(3aT0^3τ0) ln[τ0/τ]}^{1/3} is less than unity for τ > τ0, which would make the dissipative pion gas cool faster than the perfect fluid, contradicting the surrounding text and Fig. 14. The exact solution of the stated ODE is T = T0 x^{1/3}[1 + (f_η/(4aT0^3τ0))(1 - x^{4/3})]^{1/3} with x = τ0/τ, whose small-logarithm limit is the printed expression with ln(τ/τ0). Please correct the argument of the logarithm and, if the printed form is intended as an approximation, say so.
[§VI.B, Eqs. (168)–(169)] The intermediate factor in Eq. (168) should be √(3/2)Φ rather than (√3/2)Φ: with π^{ij} = diag(-π/2, -π/2, π) one has π^{μν}π_{μν} = (3/2)π², and Φ = -π. The final bound Φ ≪ √(2/3)p in Eq. (169) is correct, so only the intermediate line needs fixing.
[Fig. 10 caption and panel labels] The temperature panel is labelled τ0 = 0.13 fm/c while the entropy panel of the same figure is labelled τ0 = 0.22 fm/c, and the text states τ0 = 0.13 fm/c from τ0 ≈ 1/(3T0) at T0 = 500 MeV. Please make the two panels consistent.
[Figs. 10 and 14, legends] The legend entry reads 'Perfect order' where 'Perfect fluid' is meant, in both Fig. 10 and Fig. 14.
[§VI.B, Eq. (161) and the step to Eq. (163)] The definition of Δ̃^{μν} ('equal to Δ^{μν} for 0 ≤ μ,ν ≤ 1 and zero otherwise') is ambiguous, and the reduction of the tensor equation (161) to the scalar equation (163) for Φ = π^{00} - π^{zz} is not shown. Since the y-independence of Φ is used throughout, please add the one or two lines that make it explicit.
[§VI.B, Eqs. (158) and (171)] Two different Reynolds-like numbers are introduced, R = 3(a/b)Tτ and R_τ = (2/3)(a/b)Tτ, so that R_τ = (2/9)R. The relation is never stated, and a reader may wonder whether the two are meant to coincide. A sentence connecting them would help.
[§VI.C and Fig. 1] Fig. 1 evaluates the characteristic speeds with z = m/T using the physical pion mass, while §VI.C adopts a massless pion equation of state. Please state explicitly that Fig. 1 is illustrative of the massive case and is not the regime used in the evolution equations.
[§VI.B, Fig. 7] The curves for Φ0 = 2p0 and Φ0 = 4p0 violate the validity condition Eq. (169) and, at Φ0 = 4p0, saturate R0 = 1. The text calls these choices unphysical, which is fine, but the figure caption should mark them as outside the domain of validity so that they are not read as physical predictions.
[§I and §III] Sections II–IV reproduce standard published material (Eckart, Landau–Lifshitz, Israel–Stewart, Hiscock–Lindblom). It would help the reader to state at the end of §I which results in this manuscript are new relative to the author's earlier work in refs. [18]–[20] and which are review.
[General] There are several typographical errors, among them 'perfects fluids' in §I, 'wich' in §III.D, 'coliisions' in §VII, and inconsistent use of 'Landau and Lifshitz' versus 'Landau–Lifshitz'. The reference list also contains a duplicated item number [2] formatting irregularity and a stray '[45]' that is never cited in the text.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper argues that causal second-order Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics, not first-order Navier-Stokes, correctly describes the early cooling of matter in a boost-invariant heavy-ion collision, and that first-order theory fails precisely où

The reading

The paper asks whether the causal Müller–Israel–Stewart (second-order) theory of dissipative relativistic fluids describes the early, high-gradient stage of a heavy-ion collision better than the first-order Eckart/Landau–Lifshitz theory or perfect-fluid Euler dynamics. Working in the Bjorken boost-invariant scaling limit with a massless quark–gluon plasma, it evolves temperature, energy density, and entropy using a dynamical shear-stress equation rather than the algebraic Navier–Stokes relation $3$. The central finding is that the first-order theory can produce an unphysical early rise in temperature and entropy when the Reynolds number $R=(3a/b)T3$ falls below one, while the second-order theory keeps the shear flux inside its stated validity bound and tracks the VNI parton-cascade energy density when the initial shear flux is fitted at about $4$. The paper also locates the regime where first-order Navier–Stokes–Fourier is a reasonable limit, namely $R_05$, equivalently $T_0T_06$, where dissipation is weak enough for the algebraic constitutive law to be accurate. That matters because it would license causal hydrodynamics for times comparable to the relaxation time, exactly the window in which heavy-ion fireballs start their expansion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the shear viscous flux $13$ in the Landau–Lifshitz frame, evolved by the Israel–Stewart relaxation equation rather than tied instantaneously to the velocity gradient. In the Bjorken scaling solution the expansion scalar is $14$, so the first-order law collapses to $15$ and the second-order theory adds a relaxation time $16$ plus a term that tracks the temperature dependence of $17$. The comparison is organized by the Reynolds number $18$, which measures whether the dissipative term is small relative to the pressure; $R_0<1$ is where the first-order solution misbehaves and $R_019$ is where it can be trusted.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the Bjorken scaling limit the causal second-order shear evolution equation $$7$$ gives a physically sensible cooling history for the partonic fluid, whereas the first-order algebraic law $8$ can make temperature and entropy rise before falling. The paper supports this by comparing the second-order solution with VNI transport results for Au+Au at $9$ AGeV, fitting $10$, and by showing that the first-order solution produces a spurious peak in the same early-time region. It then states the condition under which the first-order Navier–Stokes–Fourier laws remain a reasonable limiting case: $R_011$, or $T_0T_012$.

Load-bearing premise

The agreement with transport models rests on fitting a single initial shear flux, $25$ at RHIC and $0.3p_0$ at LHC, to preliminary VNI cascade points inside a massless $p=26$ Bjorken model with only shear viscosity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Early-stage heavy-ion simulations should replace the algebraic Navier–Stokes shear law with the Israel–Stewart relaxation equation whenever the evolution time is comparable to $20$.
The early temperature rise and entropy peak predicted by first-order theory are artifacts of using it outside its domain, not physical features of the collision.
Slower cooling and enhanced entropy production in the causal theory imply delayed freeze-out and larger thermal photon and dilepton yields than first-order estimates.
The criterion $R_021$, equivalently $T_0T_022$, gives a quantitative switch point for using Navier–Stokes–Fourier as a limiting case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the fitted $23$ is nearly the same across cascades and energies, initial viscous stress may be treatable as a fixed fraction of pressure rather than a free tuning parameter.
A parameter-free initialization of $24$ from kinetic theory would turn the qualitative shape agreement with VNI into a sharper test of second-order hydrodynamics.
The Reynolds-number criterion could be reused in hybrid models to decide where hydrodynamic evolution hands off to a transport cascade.

Original abstract

Non-equilibrium fluid dynamics derived from the extended irreversible thermodynamics of the causal M\"uller--Israel--Stewart theory of dissipative processes in relativistic fluids based on Grad's moment method is applied to the study of the dynamics of hot matter produced in ultra--relativistic heavy ion collisions. The temperature, energy density and entropy evolution are investigated in the framework of the Bjorken boost--invariant scaling limit. The results of these second order theories are compared to those of first order theories due to Eckart and to Landau and Lifshitz and those of zeroth order (perfect fluid) due to Euler. In the presence of dissipation perfect fluid dynamics is no longer valid in describing the evolution of the matter. First order theories fail in the early stages of evolution. Second order theories give a better description in good agreement with transport models. It is shown in which region the Navier--Stokes--Fourier laws (first order theories) are a reasonable limiting case of the more general extended thermodynamics (second order theories).

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,614 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.51 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Non-equilibrium fluid dynamics derived from the extended irreversible thermodynamics of the causal M\"uller--Israel--Stewart theory of dissipative processes in relativistic fluids based on Grad's moment method is applied to the study of the dynamics of hot matter produced in ultra--relativistic heavy ion collisions. The temperature, energy density and entropy evolution are investigated in the framework of the Bjorken boost--invariant scaling limit. The results of these second order theories are compared to those of first order theories due to Eckart and to Landau and Lifshitz and those of zeroth order (perfect fluid) due to Euler. In the presence of dissipation perfect fluid dynamics is no longer valid in describing the evolution of the matter. First order theories fail in the early stages of evolution. Second order theories give a better description in good agreement with transport models. It is shown in which region the Navier--Stokes--Fourier laws (first order theories) are a reasonable limiting case of the more general extended thermodynamics (second order theories).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Non-equilibrium fluid dynamics derived from the extended irreversible thermodynamics of the causal M\"uller--Israel--Stewart theory of dissipative processes in relativistic fluids based on Grad's moment method is applied to the study of the dynamics of hot matter produced in ultra--relativistic heavy ion collisions.	method 0.62	0.76	0.06	asserted 0.94
s1	The temperature, energy density and entropy evolution are investigated in the framework of the Bjorken boost--invariant scaling limit.	method 0.75	0.85	0.03	asserted 0.92
s2	The results of these second order theories are compared to those of first order theories due to Eckart and to Landau and Lifshitz and those of zeroth order (perfect fluid) due to Euler.	method 0.56	0.73	0.06	asserted 0.82
s3	In the presence of dissipation perfect fluid dynamics is no longer valid in describing the evolution of the matter.	result 0.41	0.34	0.15	asserted 1.00
s4	First order theories fail in the early stages of evolution.	result 0.93	0.62	0.17	asserted 1.00
s5	Second order theories give a better description in good agreement with transport models.	result 0.92	0.84	0.64	asserted 0.98
s6	It is shown in which region the Navier--Stokes--Fourier laws (first order theories) are a reasonable limiting case of the more general extended thermodynamics (second order theories).	result 0.75	0.84	0.14	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.55 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.58.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Proper time evolution for temperature, energy densi

**Figure 9.** FIG. 9. The proper time evolution of energy density. The data

**Figure 10.** FIG. 10. The proper time evolution of temperature and entrop

**Figure 11.** FIG. 11. The proper time evolution of temperature and entrop

**Figure 12.** FIG. 12. The proper time evolution of temperature for RHIC sc

**Figure 13.** FIG. 13. The proper time evolution of temperature for or

**Figure 14.** FIG. 14. The proper time evolution of temperature for

Showing 9 of the paper's 14 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:nucl-th/0309055 by the authors.

References

Works cited (55)

[1]

A compilation of current RHIC results can be found in: Quark Matter ’01, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Co nference on Ultra- Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at Stony-Brook, NY, USA, Nuc l. Phys. A 698 (2002); Quark Matter ’02, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Co nference on Ultra- Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at N...

View on Pith 2002
[2]

For reviews on QGP signatures, see: J. Harris and B. M¨ uller, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.46 (1996) 71; S.A. Bass, M. Gyulassy, H. St¨ ocker and W. Greiner, J. Phys. G 25 (1999) R1

View on Pith 1996
[3]

H. St¨ ocker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 137 (1986) 277

View on Pith 1986
[4]

R.B. Clare and D.D. Strottman, Phys. Rep. 141 (1986) 177

View on Pith 1986
[5]

J.I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 24, (1981) 2545

View on Pith 1981
[6]

C. Eckart, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 919

View on Pith 1940
[7]

L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1959)

View on Pith 1959
[8]

H. Grad, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (1949) 331

View on Pith 1949
[9]

I. M¨ uller, Z. Phys. 198 (1967) 329

View on Pith 1967
[10]

W. Israel, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100 (1976) 310; J.M. Stewart, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 357 (1977) 59; W. Israel and J.M. Stewart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 118 (1979) 341

View on Pith 1976
[11]

W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 151 (1983) 466; Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 725; ibid. 35 (1987) 3723

View on Pith 1983
[12]

K. Kajantie, Nucl. Phys. A418 (1984) 41c; G. Baym, Nucl. Phys. A 418 (1984) 525c; A. Hosoya and K. Kajantie, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 666

View on Pith 1984
[13]

H. Kouno, M. Maruyama, F. Takagi and K. Saigo, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2903

View on Pith 1990
[14]

P. Danielewicz and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 53

View on Pith 1985
[15]

L. Mornas and U. Ornik, Nucl. Phys. A 587 (1995) 828

View on Pith 1995
[16]

A.K. Chaudhuri, J.Phys. G26 (2000) 1433; Phys.Scripta 61 (200 0) 311-313

View on Pith 2000
[17]

D. Teaney, nucl-th/0301099; nucl-th/0209024

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[18]

A. Muronga, Heavy Ion Phys. 15 (2002) 337-347; Proceedings of the 17th Winter Work- shop on Nuclear Dynamics , (edited by G.D. Westfall and W. Bauer), (EP Systema, Hungary, 2001)

View on Pith 2002
[19]

A. Muronga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 062302; Erratum-ibid. 89 (2002) 159901

View on Pith 2002
[20]

A. Muronga, Ph.D thesis, 2002, unpublished

View on Pith 2002
[21]

Y. Lallouet, D. Davesne, C. Pujol, Phys.Rev. C67 (2003) 05790 1

View on Pith 2003
[22]

D.H. Rischke, in Hadrons in Dense Matter and Hadrosynthesis , J. Cleymans, H.B. Geyer and F.G. Scholtz (Eds.), (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 516 Springer, 1999)

View on Pith 1999
[23]

P. Huovinen, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33 (2002) 1635; nucl-th/0305064

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[24]

P. F. Kolb and U. Heinz, nucl-th/0305084

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[25]

D.H. Rischke, Y. P¨ urs¨ un, and J.A. Maruhn, Nucl. Phys. A595 (1995) 383; V. Schneider et al ., J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 92

View on Pith 1995
[26]

M. Prakash, M. Prakash, R. Venugopalan, and G. Welke, Phys. Rep. 227 (1993) 321

View on Pith 1993
[27]

I.V. Karlin, A.N. Gorban, G. Dukek, T.F. Nonnemmacher, Phys. R ev. E 57, 1668 (1998); A.N Gorban and I.V. Karlin, Phys. Rev. E 54 R3109 (1996). 44

View on Pith 1998
[28]

R. Maartens and J. Triginer, Phys.Rev. D56 (1997) 4640; R. Ma artens, astro- ph/9609119

View on Pith 1997
[29]

I. M¨ uller and T. Ruggeri, Extended Thermodynamics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993)

View on Pith 1993
[30]

D. Jou, J. Casas-V´ azquez and G. Lebon,Rational Extended Thermodynamics (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1998)

View on Pith 1998
[31]

B.C. Eu, Kinetic Theory and Irreversible Thermodynamics , (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992

View on Pith 1992
[32]

S.R. deGroot, W.A. van Leeuwen, and Ch.G. van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980)

View on Pith 1980
[33]

W. Israel, in Relativistic Fluid Dynamics (edited by A. Anile and Y. Choquet–Bruhat, Springer–Verlag, Berlin 1989)

View on Pith 1989
[34]

I-Shih Liu, I. M¨ uller and T. Ruggeri, Ann. Phys. 169 (1986) 191

View on Pith 1986
[35]

C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, (W.H. Freeman and Com- pany, New York, 1973)

View on Pith 1973
[36]

S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

View on Pith 1972
[37]

L.P. Csernai, Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions (Wiley, New York, 1994)

View on Pith 1994
[38]

C. Cattaneo, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 247 (1958) 431

View on Pith 1958
[39]

J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 140

View on Pith 1983
[40]

K. Geiger, Phys. Rept. 258 (1995) 237; K. Geiger, Comput. Phys. Commun. 104 (1997) 70

View on Pith 1995
[41]

X.N. Wang, Phys. Rep. 280 (1997) 287

View on Pith 1997
[42]

S. A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, M. Brandstetter, L. Bra vina, C. Ernst, L. Ger- land, M. Hofmann, S. Hofmann, J. Konopka, G. Mao, L. Neise, S. So ﬀ, C. Spieles, H. Weber, L. A. Winckelmann, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greiner, C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin and N. Amelin, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41 (1998) 225

View on Pith 1998
[43]

J. Kapusta, L. McLerran, and D.K. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 145

View on Pith 1992
[44]

T. Peitzmann and M.H. Thoma, Phys. Rep. 364 (2002) 175

View on Pith 2002
[45]

P. Huovinen, P.V. Ruuskanen, and J. Sollfrank, Nucl. Phys. A 650 (1999) 227

View on Pith 1999
[46]

S. A. Bass, B. Mueller, D.K. Srivastava, Phys.Lett. B551 (2003 ) 277

View on Pith 2003
[47]

M. Gyulassy, Y. Pang, Bin Zhang, Nucl.Phys. A626 (1997) 999

View on Pith 1997
[48]

A. Dumitru and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B494 (2000) 215

View on Pith 2000
[49]

S.A. Bass, and A. Dumitru, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 064909

View on Pith 2000
[50]

J. Brachmann, A. Dumitru, J.A. Marun, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greine r and D.H. Rischke, Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 391

View on Pith 1997
[51]

S. Gavin, Nucl. Phys. A 435 (1985) 826

View on Pith 1985
[52]

G. Baym, H. Monien, C.J. Pethick and D.G. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. L ett. 64, (1990) 1867; G. Baym and H. Heiselberg, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5254

View on Pith 1990
[53]

A. M. Anile, D. Pavon and V. Romano, gr-qc/9810014; L. Herre ra, D.Pavon, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001) 088503; L. Herrera, D.Pavon, Physica A 307 (2002) 121

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[54]

A. Muronga and D.H. Rischke, work in progress

View on Pith
[55]

A. Muronga, nucl-th/0309056. 45

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

Forward citations

Cited by 35 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Exact hydrodynamic attractor of an ultrarelativistic gas of hard spheres
nucl-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

A gas of hard spheres expanding in Bjorken flow has a constant Knudsen number, which yields an exact analytical hydrodynamic attractor and the first convergent gradient expansion in an expanding relativistic system.
Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity
hep-th 2007-12 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

Einstein's equations in anti-de Sitter space, expanded in boundary derivatives, yield the nonlinear equations of a conformal fluid whose second-order transport coefficients are computed explicitly.
First-Order General-Relativistic Viscous Fluid Dynamics
gr-qc 2020-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A first-order relativistic viscous fluid theory with baryon number is proven causal, stable, and locally well-posed in the full nonlinear regime, with and without gravity.
Entropy Current in Conformal Hydrodynamics
hep-th 2008-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A Weyl-covariant formalism for conformal hydrodynamics yields a proposed second-order entropy current, specialized to a definite entropy flux for the N=4 SYM plasma.
Viscosity in Isotropic Cosmological Backgrounds in General Relativity and Starobinsky Gravity
gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Shear viscosity does not affect the background expansion or the electromagnetic luminosity distance in isotropic cosmologies with a comoving fluid, also in Starobinsky gravity.

Show 30 more citing papers

Quasiparticle equation of state for anisotropic hydrodynamics
hep-ph 2015-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A temperature-dependent quasiparticle mass fitted to lattice QCD reproduces the realistic equation of state in anisotropic hydrodynamics and yields nearly the same temperature evolution as the standard method but a qu...
Second-order (2+1)-dimensional anisotropic hydrodynamics
nucl-th 2013-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Second-order anisotropic hydrodynamics, which lets the particle distribution deviate from a purely squashed shape, tracks the exact one-dimensional Boltzmann benchmark more closely than leading-order anisotropic, Isra...
Dissipative Dynamics of Highly Anisotropic Systems
nucl-th 2010-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Two coupled equations, derived from moments of the Boltzmann equation around an anisotropic distribution, describe the early-time evolution of a boost-invariant plasma and reduce to Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics near e...
Relativistic Viscous Fluid Dynamics and Non-Equilibrium Entropy
hep-th 2009-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper derives the complete second-order relativistic viscous fluid equations and the non-equilibrium entropy current, fixing several entropy-current coefficients by requiring that entropy never decreases.
Finite-Density Dynamics of Chemically Equilibrating QGP in Conformal Gubser Flow and Hard Thermal Photon Production
hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Models chemical non-equilibrium in finite-density QGP under conformal Gubser flow and its impact on hard thermal photon production, finding delayed equilibration with quarks lagging gluons, suppressed total yield but ...
Freeze-out and spectral running of primordial gravitational waves in viscous cosmology
astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Shear viscosity adds damping to primordial gravitational waves, producing an extra red tilt for constant viscosity-to-Hubble ratio and a k-dependent blue tilt from freeze-out in the electron-photon-baryon plasma with ...
Thermal dilepton production within conformal viscous Gubser flow
hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Thermal dilepton yields and effective temperatures are computed for conformal viscous Gubser flow, showing larger yields for lower q (larger systems) and higher effective temperatures for smaller systems.
Quasiparticle second-order dissipative hydrodynamics at finite chemical potential
hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A quasiparticle kinetic theory with a bag term yields second-order equations of relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics with baryon diffusion and chemical-potential-dependent transport coefficients.
New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era
hep-ph 2017-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

The hydrodynamic gradient expansion is an asymptotic series whose large-order factorial growth encodes the transient, nonhydrodynamic modes of the underlying plasma.
Bulk viscous evolution within anisotropic hydrodynamics
hep-ph 2014-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Adding an explicit bulk-pressure degree of freedom to anisotropic hydrodynamics improves agreement with the exact Boltzmann solution for the bulk pressure of a massive gas, at a small cost to the pressure anisotropy.
Boost-Invariant (2+1)-dimensional Anisotropic Hydrodynamics
nucl-th 2012-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The authors derive and numerically solve (2+1)-dimensional anisotropic hydrodynamics with a hard-scale-proportional relaxation rate, finding agreement with second-order viscous hydrodynamics at small shear viscosity a...
Thermal Bottomonium Suppression at RHIC and LHC
nucl-th 2011-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Bottomonium suppression data from RHIC and LHC are consistent with a shear-viscosity-to-entropy ratio between 0.08 and 0.24, provided the heavy-quark potential is taken from the internal energy rather than the free energy.
Thermal Upsilon(1s) and chi_b1 suppression in sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC
hep-ph 2011-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Thermal suppression of Upsilon(1s) and chi_b1 in 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, computed with anisotropic hydrodynamics and a complex heavy-quark potential, reproduces preliminary CMS Upsilon(1s) R_AA across centrality an...
Quarkonium states in a complex-valued potential
hep-ph 2011-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Including the imaginary part of the heavy-quark potential raises the predicted quarkonium disassociation temperatures and produces a roughly 60 MeV anisotropy-induced splitting of the chi_b p-wave states.
Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions
hep-th 2009-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The AdS/CFT dictionary for Gauss-Bonnet gravity in arbitrary D yields bounds on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling from positive energy flux that exactly match the causality bounds from black hole perturbations.
Causality of Holographic Hydrodynamics
hep-th 2009-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Causality of linearized fluctuations in Gauss-Bonnet holography restricts the dual central-charge asymmetry to the interval -1/2 to 1/2, matching the Hofman-Maldacena energy-flux bound.
Causal hydrodynamics of gauge theory plasmas from AdS/CFT duality
hep-th 2007-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The shear-stress relaxation time extracted from the shear mode and from the sound mode of holographic plasmas disagree, implying Israel-Stewart causal hydrodynamics is insufficient for these theories.
The anisotropic non-equilibrium hydrodynamic attractor
nucl-th 2017-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The aHydro attractor for a 0+1d conformal RTA plasma matches the exact Boltzmann attractor to 0.04 percent, which the authors attribute to an all-orders resummation in inverse Reynolds number.
Anisotropic hydrodynamic modeling of 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions
nucl-th 2017-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Quasiparticle anisotropic hydrodynamics with three momentum-anisotropy parameters and anisotropic freeze-out describes ALICE Pb-Pb spectra, elliptic flow, and HBT radii using three fitted parameters.
Exact solution of the (0+1)-dimensional Boltzmann equation for a massive gas
hep-ph 2014-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

An exact integral-equation solution of the relaxation-time Boltzmann equation for a boost-invariant massive gas confirms standard shear and bulk viscosity formulas at late times but shows that second-order hydrodynami...
Causal Viscous Hydrodynamics for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
nucl-th 2009-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions with shear viscosity near the KSS bound suppresses elliptic flow by roughly 30%, making v2 a sensitive diagnostic of the quark-gluon plasma shear viscosity to entropy ratio.
Correspondence between hydrodynamic frames, transport coefficients, and hydrodynamic modes in relativistic fluids
nucl-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

The Landau-Lifshitz thermal conductivity equals the Eckart value times (nT/(ε+P))², and the sound attenuation coefficient is frame independent.
Relativistic anisotropic hydrodynamics
nucl-th 2017-12 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Anisotropic hydrodynamics, which deforms the particle distribution function rather than linearizing around equilibrium, reproduces exact Boltzmann solutions better than second- and third-order viscous hydrodynamics in...
Gravity & Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence
hep-th 2009-05 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Einstein's equations with a negative cosmological constant, expanded in boundary derivatives, reproduce the relativistic Navier-Stokes equations, and every fluid flow lifts to a regular asymptotically AdS black hole.
Hydrodynamic attractors in heavy ion collisions: a review
hep-th 2021-09 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Boost-invariant expanding plasmas in hydrodynamics, holography and kinetic theory all converge onto a common attractor solution that erases memory of initial conditions before thermalization, and this is the review's ...
Relativistic hydrodynamics in heavy-ion collisions: general aspects and recent developments
nucl-th 2016-05 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Relativistic hydrodynamics with a small shear viscosity to entropy ratio quantitatively reproduces the collective flow observables of the quark-gluon plasma at RHIC and LHC, and the same framework is being extended to...
Anisotropic Hydrodynamics: Three lectures
nucl-th 2014-10 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

Anisotropic hydrodynamics extends relativistic fluid modeling to far-from-equilibrium heavy-ion systems by promoting momentum-space anisotropy to a leading-order dynamical variable, and it outperforms standard second-...
Quarkonia in the Quark Gluon Plasma
hep-ph 2013-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

Quarkonium melting in the quark-gluon plasma is governed by a complex-valued heavy-quark potential whose imaginary part produces in-medium widths of 20 to 100 MeV, blurring the sharp dissociation temperatures of the o...
Gauge/String Duality, Hot QCD and Heavy Ion Collisions
hep-th 2011-01 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

The review synthesizes a decade of work showing that strongly coupled plasma calculations from gauge/string duality give a coherent, quantitatively useful picture of hot QCD matter and heavy ion observables.
New Developments in Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics
hep-ph 2009-02 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics can be formulated consistently from three starting points and solved numerically to describe heavy-ion collision data, though several transport coefficients and initial conditions re...

How the literature uses it

70 arXiv papers cite this in 88 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 50 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers

In fact, the speed of transverse plane wave, $v_T$, with the value of $β_2$ in Eq. ([ref]) gives [ref] [equation] where we have used the values of $ϵ$ and $p$ obtained in the previous work on bulk thermodynamics of SU(3) gauge theory [ref] .

Evaluation of Israel-Stewart parameters in lattice gauge theory · Numerical Results · 0.93
where $=d/dτ$ and for RTA $β_ππ = 38/21$ and $τ_π= τ_eq$ in the complete second order calculation (which is the case for DNMR) [ref] , while in MIS $β_ππ = 4/3$ and $τ_π= 6τ_eq/5$ [ref] .

The anisotropic non-equilibrium hydrodynamic attractor · Kinetic theory and second order hydrodynamics · 0.95

Compares with it 1 paper

In addition, we demonstrate analytically that when the associated coupled nonlinear differential equations are expanded to leading order in the anisotropy parameter, they reduce identically to the 2nd order viscous hydrodynamic equations of Israel and Stewart [ref] .

Dissipative Dynamics of Highly Anisotropic Systems · Introduction · 0.82

Cites it as support 2 papers

Indeed the MIS term is sufficient to tame the superluminal propagation with an appropriate choice of the relaxation time $τ_Π$, as we demonstrate below [ref] .

Causality of Holographic Hydrodynamics · Introduction · 0.99
Finally, we note that the product of the transport coefficients that couple the dissipative currents, namely $ℓ_νπ$ and $ℓ_πν$, is negative, which is in agreement with the second law of thermodynamics [ref] .

Hydrodynamic theories for a system of weakly self-interacting classical ultra-relativistic scalar particles: microscopic derivations and attractors · Shear-stress tensor · 0.96

Cites it as background 31 papers

In this section, we overview relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics, especially Israel-Stewart (IS) theory [ref] .

Evaluation of Israel-Stewart parameters in lattice gauge theory · Israel-Stewart theory · 1.00
The approaches used for this purpose have included relativistic ideal hydrodynamics [ref] , second-order viscous hydrodynamics [ref] , and, most recently, anisotropic hydrodynamics [ref] .

Anisotropic hydrodynamics for conformal Gubser flow · Introduction · 0.99
As the QGP evolves, it cools and the systems forms hadrons (and a relatively small number of light nuclei) that eventually freeze out and stream to the detectors [ref] .

The Hypertriton Puzzle in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions · The puzzle · 0.96

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

A compilation of current RHIC results can be found in: Quark Matter ’01, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Co nference on Ultra- Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at Stony-Brook, NY, USA, Nuc l. Phys. A 698 (2002); Quark Matter ’02, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Co nference on Ultra- Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at N...

View on Pith 2002

[2] [2]

For reviews on QGP signatures, see: J. Harris and B. M¨ uller, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.46 (1996) 71; S.A. Bass, M. Gyulassy, H. St¨ ocker and W. Greiner, J. Phys. G 25 (1999) R1

View on Pith 1996

[3] [3]

H. St¨ ocker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 137 (1986) 277

View on Pith 1986

[4] [4]

R.B. Clare and D.D. Strottman, Phys. Rep. 141 (1986) 177

View on Pith 1986

[5] [5]

J.I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 24, (1981) 2545

View on Pith 1981

[6] [6]

C. Eckart, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 919

View on Pith 1940

[7] [7]

L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1959)

View on Pith 1959

[8] [8]

H. Grad, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (1949) 331

View on Pith 1949

[9] [9]

I. M¨ uller, Z. Phys. 198 (1967) 329

View on Pith 1967

[10] [10]

W. Israel, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100 (1976) 310; J.M. Stewart, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 357 (1977) 59; W. Israel and J.M. Stewart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 118 (1979) 341

View on Pith 1976

[11] [11]

W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 151 (1983) 466; Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 725; ibid. 35 (1987) 3723

View on Pith 1983

[12] [12]

K. Kajantie, Nucl. Phys. A418 (1984) 41c; G. Baym, Nucl. Phys. A 418 (1984) 525c; A. Hosoya and K. Kajantie, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 666

View on Pith 1984

[13] [13]

H. Kouno, M. Maruyama, F. Takagi and K. Saigo, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2903

View on Pith 1990

[14] [14]

P. Danielewicz and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 53

View on Pith 1985

[15] [15]

L. Mornas and U. Ornik, Nucl. Phys. A 587 (1995) 828

View on Pith 1995

[16] [16]

A.K. Chaudhuri, J.Phys. G26 (2000) 1433; Phys.Scripta 61 (200 0) 311-313

View on Pith 2000

[17] [17]

D. Teaney, nucl-th/0301099; nucl-th/0209024

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[18] [18]

A. Muronga, Heavy Ion Phys. 15 (2002) 337-347; Proceedings of the 17th Winter Work- shop on Nuclear Dynamics , (edited by G.D. Westfall and W. Bauer), (EP Systema, Hungary, 2001)

View on Pith 2002

[19] [19]

A. Muronga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 062302; Erratum-ibid. 89 (2002) 159901

View on Pith 2002

[20] [20]

A. Muronga, Ph.D thesis, 2002, unpublished

View on Pith 2002

[21] [21]

Y. Lallouet, D. Davesne, C. Pujol, Phys.Rev. C67 (2003) 05790 1

View on Pith 2003

[22] [22]

D.H. Rischke, in Hadrons in Dense Matter and Hadrosynthesis , J. Cleymans, H.B. Geyer and F.G. Scholtz (Eds.), (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 516 Springer, 1999)

View on Pith 1999

[23] [23]

P. Huovinen, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33 (2002) 1635; nucl-th/0305064

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[24] [24]

P. F. Kolb and U. Heinz, nucl-th/0305084

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[25] [25]

D.H. Rischke, Y. P¨ urs¨ un, and J.A. Maruhn, Nucl. Phys. A595 (1995) 383; V. Schneider et al ., J. Comput. Phys. 105 (1993) 92

View on Pith 1995

[26] [26]

M. Prakash, M. Prakash, R. Venugopalan, and G. Welke, Phys. Rep. 227 (1993) 321

View on Pith 1993

[27] [27]

I.V. Karlin, A.N. Gorban, G. Dukek, T.F. Nonnemmacher, Phys. R ev. E 57, 1668 (1998); A.N Gorban and I.V. Karlin, Phys. Rev. E 54 R3109 (1996). 44

View on Pith 1998

[28] [28]

R. Maartens and J. Triginer, Phys.Rev. D56 (1997) 4640; R. Ma artens, astro- ph/9609119

View on Pith 1997

[29] [29]

I. M¨ uller and T. Ruggeri, Extended Thermodynamics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993)

View on Pith 1993

[30] [30]

D. Jou, J. Casas-V´ azquez and G. Lebon,Rational Extended Thermodynamics (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1998)

View on Pith 1998

[31] [31]

B.C. Eu, Kinetic Theory and Irreversible Thermodynamics , (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992

View on Pith 1992

[32] [32]

S.R. deGroot, W.A. van Leeuwen, and Ch.G. van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980)

View on Pith 1980

[33] [33]

W. Israel, in Relativistic Fluid Dynamics (edited by A. Anile and Y. Choquet–Bruhat, Springer–Verlag, Berlin 1989)

View on Pith 1989

[34] [34]

I-Shih Liu, I. M¨ uller and T. Ruggeri, Ann. Phys. 169 (1986) 191

View on Pith 1986

[35] [35]

C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, (W.H. Freeman and Com- pany, New York, 1973)

View on Pith 1973

[36] [36]

S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

View on Pith 1972

[37] [37]

L.P. Csernai, Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions (Wiley, New York, 1994)

View on Pith 1994

[38] [38]

C. Cattaneo, C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 247 (1958) 431

View on Pith 1958

[39] [39]

J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 140

View on Pith 1983

[40] [40]

K. Geiger, Phys. Rept. 258 (1995) 237; K. Geiger, Comput. Phys. Commun. 104 (1997) 70

View on Pith 1995

[41] [41]

X.N. Wang, Phys. Rep. 280 (1997) 287

View on Pith 1997

[42] [42]

S. A. Bass, M. Belkacem, M. Bleicher, M. Brandstetter, L. Bra vina, C. Ernst, L. Ger- land, M. Hofmann, S. Hofmann, J. Konopka, G. Mao, L. Neise, S. So ﬀ, C. Spieles, H. Weber, L. A. Winckelmann, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greiner, C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin and N. Amelin, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41 (1998) 225

View on Pith 1998

[43] [43]

J. Kapusta, L. McLerran, and D.K. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 145

View on Pith 1992

[44] [44]

T. Peitzmann and M.H. Thoma, Phys. Rep. 364 (2002) 175

View on Pith 2002

[45] [45]

P. Huovinen, P.V. Ruuskanen, and J. Sollfrank, Nucl. Phys. A 650 (1999) 227

View on Pith 1999

[46] [46]

S. A. Bass, B. Mueller, D.K. Srivastava, Phys.Lett. B551 (2003 ) 277

View on Pith 2003

[47] [47]

M. Gyulassy, Y. Pang, Bin Zhang, Nucl.Phys. A626 (1997) 999

View on Pith 1997

[48] [48]

A. Dumitru and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Lett. B494 (2000) 215

View on Pith 2000

[49] [49]

S.A. Bass, and A. Dumitru, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 064909

View on Pith 2000

[50] [50]

J. Brachmann, A. Dumitru, J.A. Marun, H. St¨ ocker, W. Greine r and D.H. Rischke, Nucl. Phys. A 619 (1997) 391

View on Pith 1997

[51] [51]

S. Gavin, Nucl. Phys. A 435 (1985) 826

View on Pith 1985

[52] [52]

G. Baym, H. Monien, C.J. Pethick and D.G. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. L ett. 64, (1990) 1867; G. Baym and H. Heiselberg, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5254

View on Pith 1990

[53] [53]

A. M. Anile, D. Pavon and V. Romano, gr-qc/9810014; L. Herre ra, D.Pavon, Phys. Rev. D 64, (2001) 088503; L. Herrera, D.Pavon, Physica A 307 (2002) 121

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[54] [54]

A. Muronga and D.H. Rischke, work in progress

View on Pith

[55] [55]

A. Muronga, nucl-th/0309056. 45

View on Pith Pith review arXiv