Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Error Prevention Scheme with Four Particles

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Lev Vaidman, Lior Goldenberg, Stephen Wiesner

Quantum Physics · Submitted 28 Mar 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Thus, under certain conditions, protection of an unknown quantum state is achieved.

how it is stated · asserted 0.76 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDquant-ph/9603031 (version 2)
Pith IDHVKRYIAP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLev Vaidman, Lior Goldenberg, Stephen Wiesner. "Error Prevention Scheme with Four Particles." arXiv:quant-ph/9603031 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/HVKRYIAP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,857 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.49 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.49 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

It is shown that a simplified version of the error correction code recently suggested by Shor exhibits manifestation of the quantum Zeno effect. Thus, under certain conditions, protection of an unknown quantum state is achieved. Error prevention procedures based on four-particle and two-particle encoding are proposed and it is argued that they have feasible practical implementations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 It is shown that a simplified version of the error correction code recently suggested by Shor exhibits manifestation of the quantum Zeno effect. result 0.93 0.71 0.30 asserted 1.00
s1 Thus, under certain conditions, protection of an unknown quantum state is achieved. interpretation 0.67 0.57 0.41 asserted 0.76
s2 Error prevention procedures based on four-particle and two-particle encoding are proposed and it is argued that they have feasible practical implementations. contribution 0.95 0.82 0.36 hedged possibility 0.51

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.62.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

It is shown that a simplified version of the error correction code recently suggested by Shor exhibits manifestation of the quantum Zeno effect. Thus, under certain conditions, protection of an unknown quantum state is achieved. Error prevention procedures based on four-particle and two-particle encoding are proposed and it is argued that they have feasible practical implementations.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.