Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum Error Detection II: Bounds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/9906131 v1 pith:3OXDXRNU submitted 1999-06-30 quant-ph

Quantum Error Detection II: Bounds

classification quant-ph
keywords boundscodeserrorquantumupperboundcodeexponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In Part II we show that there exist quantum codes whose probability of undetected error falls exponentially with the length of the code and derive bounds on this exponent.The lower (existence) bound for stabilizer codes is proved by a counting argument for classical self-orthogonal quaternary codes. Upper bounds for any quantum codes are proved by linear programming. We present two general solutions of the LP problem. Together they give an upper bound on the exponent of undetected error. The upper and lower asymptotic bounds coincide for a certain interval of code rates close to 1.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Asymptotic magic state distillation with almost linear rate

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A new family of magic state distillation protocols based on logical Clifford error checking achieves near-linear asymptotic rate despite overhead exponent exceeding one, showing the quantities are not tightly coupled ...