Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Holographic entanglement entropy probes (non)locality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0803.1928 v2 pith:7RFW2QQQ submitted 2008-03-13 hep-th quant-ph

Holographic entanglement entropy probes (non)locality

classification hep-th quant-ph
keywords areaentanglemententropyholographicnoncommutativenonlocalityscaletheories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the short-distance structure of geometric entanglement entropy in certain theories with a built-in scale of nonlocality. In particular we examine the cases of Little String Theory and Noncommutative Yang-Mills theory, using their AdS/CFT descriptions. We compute the entanglement entropy via the holographic ansatz of Ryu and Takayanagi to conclude that the area law is violated at distance scales that sample the nonlocality of these models, being replaced by an extensive volume law. In the case of the noncommutative model, the critical length scale that reveals the area/volume law transition is strongly affected by UV/IR mixing effects. We also present an argument showing that Lorentz symmetry tends to protect the area law for theories with field-theoretical density of states.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Holographic Subregion Complexity and Fidelity Susceptibility in Noncommutative Yang--Mills Theory

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    In the noncommutative Yang–Mills dual, holographic subregion complexity acquires a lower bound and a minimum-length scale, and strong subadditivity fails exactly at that scale.