REVIEW 1 cited by
How good are your fits? Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests in high energy physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How good are your fits? Unbinned multivariate goodness-of-fit tests in high energy physics
read the original abstract
Multivariate analyses play an important role in high energy physics. Such analyses often involve performing an unbinned maximum likelihood fit of a probability density function (p.d.f.) to the data. This paper explores a variety of unbinned methods for determining the goodness of fit of the p.d.f. to the data. The application and performance of each method is discussed in the context of a real-life high energy physics analysis (a Dalitz-plot analysis). Several of the methods presented in this paper can also be used for the non-parametric determination of whether two samples originate from the same parent p.d.f. This can be used, e.g., to determine the quality of a detector Monte Carlo simulation without the need for a parametric expression of the efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Well-Tempered Likelihood: Honest Confidence Intervals for Misspecified Models
Dividing the likelihood-ratio statistic by a goodness-of-fit statistic stops confidence intervals from collapsing under model misspecification, making them self-limit at a floor set by the model's inadequacy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.