REVIEW 2 cited by
Convergence Rates of Inexact Proximal-Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Convergence Rates of Inexact Proximal-Gradient Methods for Convex Optimization
read the original abstract
We consider the problem of optimizing the sum of a smooth convex function and a non-smooth convex function using proximal-gradient methods, where an error is present in the calculation of the gradient of the smooth term or in the proximity operator with respect to the non-smooth term. We show that both the basic proximal-gradient method and the accelerated proximal-gradient method achieve the same convergence rate as in the error-free case, provided that the errors decrease at appropriate rates.Using these rates, we perform as well as or better than a carefully chosen fixed error level on a set of structured sparsity problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The iterates of FISTA converge even under inexact computations and stochastic gradients
Weak (and almost-sure weak) convergence of inexact and stochastically noised FISTA iterates in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, with O(1/t_k^2)-type objective rates.
-
Multilevel Preconditioning Strategies for Convex Optimization Methods in Image Deblurring
Preconditioning plus multilevel V-cycles accelerates both exact and inexact proximal gradient methods for regularized image deblurring while preserving reconstruction quality.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.