Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coulomb-Sturmian basis for the nuclear many-body problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1208.4156 v2 pith:OCOO6XP5 submitted 2012-08-21 nucl-th

Coulomb-Sturmian basis for the nuclear many-body problem

classification nucl-th
keywords basiscalculationscoulomb-sturmianfunctionsmany-bodynccino-coreconfiguration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Calculations in ab initio no-core configuration interaction (NCCI) approaches, such as the no-core shell model or no-core full configuration methods, have conventionally been carried out using the harmonic-oscillator many-body basis. However, the rapid falloff (Gaussian asymptotics) of the oscillator functions at large radius makes them poorly suited for the description of the asymptotic properties of the nuclear wave function. We establish the foundations for carrying out NCCI calculations with an alternative many-body basis built from Coulomb-Sturmian functions. These provide a complete, discrete set of functions with a realistic exponential falloff. We present illustrative NCCI calculations for 6Li with a Coulomb-Sturmian basis and investigate the center-of-mass separation and spurious excitations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Medium-mass nuclei with neural quantum states

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Pfaffian-Jastrow neural quantum states yield ground-state energies and charge radii for nuclei up to A=58, with weak p-wave terms reducing average energy error to ~3% while revealing Hamiltonian sensitivity and A^3 scaling.