Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generalized second law at linear order for actions that are functions of Lovelock densities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1306.1623 v3 pith:ONRG2DQ2 submitted 2013-06-07 gr-qc hep-th

Generalized second law at linear order for actions that are functions of Lovelock densities

classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords seconddensitiesgeneralizedhorizonslovelockactionactionsaddition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this article we consider the second law of black holes (and other causal horizons) in theories where the gravitational action is an arbitrary function of the Lovelock densities. We show that there exists an entropy which increases locally, for linearized perturbations to regular Killing horizons. In addition to a classical increase theorem, we also prove a generalized second law for semiclassical, minimally-coupled matter fields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A comparison of two constructions for dynamical corrections to Wald entropy

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    For small perturbations, the dynamical entropy S_dyn and Wall's entropy S_Wall satisfy S_dyn = (1-v∂_v)S_Wall, and this paper gives a local algorithm that reconstructs S_Wall from S_dyn once a bifurcation-surface cond...

  2. Dynamical Entropy Is a Noether Charge

    hep-th 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    A Noether-charge derivation of the known HWZ dynamical entropy for generic null surfaces, whose local second-law proof is invalid as printed because Eq. (19) has the wrong sign in K.