REVIEW 3 cited by
Nonlocal Models of Cosmic Acceleration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Nonlocal Models of Cosmic Acceleration
read the original abstract
I review a class of nonlocally modified gravity models which were proposed to explain the current phase of cosmic acceleration without dark energy. Among the topics considered are deriving causal and conserved field equations, adjusting the model to make it support a given expansion history, why these models do not require an elaborate screening mechanism to evade solar system tests, degrees of freedom and kinetic stability, and the negative verdict of structure formation. Although these simple models are not consistent with data on the growth of cosmic structures many of their features are likely to carry over to more complicated models which are in better agreement with the data.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Spherically symmetric solutions in quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity
In quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity, static spherically symmetric Frobenius solutions are classified: regular cores only, Schwarzschild-like horizons and wormhole throats, plus asymptotic 1/r^6 corrections to Schwarzschild.
-
Effective Constrained Scalar--Gauss--Bonnet Inflation Motivated by $f(R,\mathcal{G})$ Gravity
An effective constrained scalar-Gauss-Bonnet inflation model yields n_s ≃ 0.958 and r ≃ 2.7×10^{-4} while the exact theory has no propagating scalar degree of freedom.
-
Effective Constrained Scalar--Gauss--Bonnet Inflation Motivated by $f(R,\mathcal{G})$ Gravity
Effective constrained scalar-Gauss-Bonnet inflation yields ns ≃ 0.958 and r ≃ 2.7×10^{-4} with the exact theory eliminating propagating scalar degrees of freedom via vanishing lapse perturbation and ḋR=0.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.