Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ask Me Anything: Dynamic Memory Networks for Natural Language Processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1506.07285 v5 pith:YFU3HVUD submitted 2015-06-24 cs.CL cs.LGcs.NE

Ask Me Anything: Dynamic Memory Networks for Natural Language Processing

classification cs.CL cs.LGcs.NE
keywords languagetasksansweringanswersattentiondynamicinputmemory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most tasks in natural language processing can be cast into question answering (QA) problems over language input. We introduce the dynamic memory network (DMN), a neural network architecture which processes input sequences and questions, forms episodic memories, and generates relevant answers. Questions trigger an iterative attention process which allows the model to condition its attention on the inputs and the result of previous iterations. These results are then reasoned over in a hierarchical recurrent sequence model to generate answers. The DMN can be trained end-to-end and obtains state-of-the-art results on several types of tasks and datasets: question answering (Facebook's bAbI dataset), text classification for sentiment analysis (Stanford Sentiment Treebank) and sequence modeling for part-of-speech tagging (WSJ-PTB). The training for these different tasks relies exclusively on trained word vector representations and input-question-answer triplets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fusing Knowledge and Language: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Graph-Based Question Answering with LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    In a small comparative study, GraphRAG outscored spaCy and CoreNLP-based KG-QA pipelines on reasoning-heavy questions, but the evaluation design conflates method choice with pipeline architecture.