REVIEW 2 cited by
Deep Learning with Topological Signatures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Inferring topological and geometrical information from data can offer an alternative perspective on machine learning problems. Methods from topological data analysis, e.g., persistent homology, enable us to obtain such information, typically in the form of summary representations of topological features. However, such topological signatures often come with an unusual structure (e.g., multisets of intervals) that is highly impractical for most machine learning techniques. While many strategies have been proposed to map these topological signatures into machine learning compatible representations, they suffer from being agnostic to the target learning task. In contrast, we propose a technique that enables us to input topological signatures to deep neural networks and learn a task-optimal representation during training. Our approach is realized as a novel input layer with favorable theoretical properties. Classification experiments on 2D object shapes and social network graphs demonstrate the versatility of the approach and, in case of the latter, we even outperform the state-of-the-art by a large margin.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning
An edge-filtration persistence diagram built on line graphs (TED/LGVR) is proven to retain node coloring information and beat the Weisfeiler-Lehman test in expressive power, with GNN variants showing benchmark gains.
-
Preserving Information: How does Topological Data Analysis improve Neural Network performance?
Stitching persistence images computed by topological data analysis into CNN inputs improves noisy-MNIST accuracy for small training sets, e.g., from 26% to 69% at 100 clean training images.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.