Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MagNet and "Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks" are Not Robust to Adversarial Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.08478 v1 pith:TL5IVBLA submitted 2017-11-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

Nicholas Carlini , David Wagner This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CR
keywords adversarialdefensesexamplesefficientmagnetattacksconstructdefeat
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

MagNet and "Efficient Defenses..." were recently proposed as a defense to adversarial examples. We find that we can construct adversarial examples that defeat these defenses with only a slight increase in distortion.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Machine Learning Conferences Should Establish a "Refutations and Critiques" Track

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ML conferences should create an official peer-reviewed track dedicated to refuting and critiquing previously published work.

  2. Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A certified robustness radius says nothing about whether a sample is clean or correctly predicted, so certification does not yet imply model security.

Pith tools