pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1712.03316 · v3 · submitted 2017-12-09 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environments

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords interactivequestionsceneagentansweringiquadquestionsvisual
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce Interactive Question Answering (IQA), the task of answering questions that require an autonomous agent to interact with a dynamic visual environment. IQA presents the agent with a scene and a question, like: "Are there any apples in the fridge?" The agent must navigate around the scene, acquire visual understanding of scene elements, interact with objects (e.g. open refrigerators) and plan for a series of actions conditioned on the question. Popular reinforcement learning approaches with a single controller perform poorly on IQA owing to the large and diverse state space. We propose the Hierarchical Interactive Memory Network (HIMN), consisting of a factorized set of controllers, allowing the system to operate at multiple levels of temporal abstraction. To evaluate HIMN, we introduce IQUAD V1, a new dataset built upon AI2-THOR, a simulated photo-realistic environment of configurable indoor scenes with interactive objects (code and dataset available at https://github.com/danielgordon10/thor-iqa-cvpr-2018). IQUAD V1 has 75,000 questions, each paired with a unique scene configuration. Our experiments show that our proposed model outperforms popular single controller based methods on IQUAD V1. For sample questions and results, please view our video: https://youtu.be/pXd3C-1jr98

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement

    cs.CV 2018-04 accept novelty 4.0

    YOLOv3 achieves accuracy comparable to SSD and RetinaNet but runs substantially faster, with 28.2 mAP at 320x320 in 22 ms and 57.9 mAP@50 in 51 ms on Titan X.