REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On the Practical Computational Power of Finite Precision RNNs for Language Recognition
read the original abstract
While Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are famously known to be Turing complete, this relies on infinite precision in the states and unbounded computation time. We consider the case of RNNs with finite precision whose computation time is linear in the input length. Under these limitations, we show that different RNN variants have different computational power. In particular, we show that the LSTM and the Elman-RNN with ReLU activation are strictly stronger than the RNN with a squashing activation and the GRU. This is achieved because LSTMs and ReLU-RNNs can easily implement counting behavior. We show empirically that the LSTM does indeed learn to effectively use the counting mechanism.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When Does Reward Teach State? A Hidden-Automaton Instrument and the Group-Language Boundary
An RL agent can earn high reward while its representation of a hidden DFA's state stays at chance; a white-box hidden-DFA instrument measures this decoupling, and permutation/group structure flags such perception gaps...
-
When Does Reward Teach State? A Hidden-Automaton Instrument and the Group-Language Boundary
High reward in sparse RL does not imply latent-state recovery; a hidden-DFA instrument separates perception from planning gaps and flags group-language structure as a pre-training warning.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.