Recognition: unknown
CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
read the original abstract
Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240 patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14 observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate performance of chest radiograph interpretation models. The dataset is freely available at https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/chexpert .
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CheXTemporal: A Dataset for Temporally-Grounded Reasoning in Chest Radiography
CheXTemporal supplies paired chest X-rays with explicit temporal progression taxonomy and spatial grounding to benchmark and improve models on longitudinal reasoning tasks.
-
CheXthought: A global multimodal dataset of clinical chain-of-thought reasoning and visual attention for chest X-ray interpretation
CheXthought supplies large-scale expert chain-of-thought reasoning and synchronized visual attention data for chest X-rays to train more accurate and interpretable clinical vision-language models.
-
Scaling Vision Models Does Not Consistently Improve Localisation-Based Explanation Quality
Scaling vision models by depth and parameter count does not consistently improve localisation-based explanation quality across architectures, datasets, and post-hoc methods; smaller models often perform comparably or better.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.