pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1901.10342 · v5 · submitted 2019-01-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Looking inside jets: an introduction to jet substructure and boosted-object phenomenology

Simone Marzani , Gregory Soyez , Michael Spannowsky
Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords substructuretechniquesphysicsjetsoftenalgorithmsareacalculations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The study of the internal structure of hadronic jets has become in recent years a very active area of research in particle physics. Jet substructure techniques are increasingly used in experimental analyses by the LHC collaborations, both in the context of searching for new physics and for Standard Model measurements. On the theory side, the quest for a deeper understanding of jet substructure algorithms has contributed to a renewed interest in all-order calculations in QCD. This has resulted in new ideas about how to design better observables and how to provide a solid theoretical description for them. In the last years, jet substructure has seen its scope extended, for example, with an increasing impact in the study of heavy-ion collisions, or with the exploration of deep-learning techniques. Furthermore, jet physics is an area in which experimental and theoretical approaches meet together, where cross-pollination and collaboration between the two communities often bear the fruits of innovative techniques. Despite the wealth of literature on this topic, we feel that a comprehensive and, at the same time, pedagogical introduction to jet substructure is still missing. This makes the endeavour of approaching the field particularly hard, as newcomers have to digest an increasing number of substructure algorithms and techniques, too often characterised by opaque terminology and jargon. Furthermore, while first-principle calculations in QCD have successfully been applied in order to understand and characterise the substructure of jets, they often make use of calculational techniques, such as resummation, which are not the usual textbook material. Thus, the idea of combining our experience in different aspects of jet substructure phenomenology to put together this set of lecture notes, which we hope could help and guide someone who moves their first steps in the physics of jet substructure.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Simultaneous measurements of $N$-subjettiness observables in jets from gluons and light-flavour quarks, and in decays of boosted W bosons and top quarks

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CMS reports a simultaneous measurement of 25 N-subjettiness observables in 1-, 2-, and 3-prong jets, unfolded to stable particles with particle-level correlations for QCD modeling.

  2. Full energy fraction and angular dependence of medium-induced splittings in the large-$N_c$ limit

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In large-Nc and harmonic oscillator limits, medium-induced splittings are computed analytically double-differential in z and θ, with an improved semi-hard approximation validated for high-energy partons.

  3. Explainable AI for Jet Tagging: A Comparative Study of GNNExplainer, GNNShap, and GradCAM for Jet Tagging in the Lund Jet Plane

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Explainability techniques applied to LundNet show that assigned node importance correlates with classical jet substructure observables such as N-subjettiness ratios and energy correlation functions, with shifts across...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. H. Seymour,Tagging a heavy Higgs boson, inECFA Large Hadron Collider Workshop, Aachen, Germany, 4-9 Oct 1990: Proceedings.2., pp. 557–569, 1991

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    M. H. Seymour,Searches for new particles using cone and cluster jet algorithms: A Comparative study,Z.Phys.C62(1994) 127–138

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    M. H. Seymour,The Average number of subjets in a hadron collider jet,Nucl. Phys.B421(1994) 545–564

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Butterworth, B

    J. Butterworth, B. Cox and J. R. Forshaw,W Wscattering at the CERN LHC, Phys.Rev.D65(2002) 096014, [hep-ph/0201098]

    work page arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin and G. P. Salam,Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 242001, [0802.2470]

    work page arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Abdesselam et al.,Boosted objects: a probe of beyond the standard model physics,EPHJA,C71,1661.2011C71(2011) 1661, [1012.5412]

    A. Abdesselam et al.,Boosted objects: a probe of beyond the standard model physics,EPHJA,C71,1661.2011C71(2011) 1661, [1012.5412]

    work page arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Altheimer, S

    A. Altheimer, S. Arora, L. Asquith, G. Brooijmans, J. Butterworth et al.,Jet Substructure at the Tevatron and LHC: New results, new tools, new benchmarks, J.Phys.G39(2012) 063001, [1201.0008]

    work page arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Altheimer, A

    A. Altheimer, A. Arce, L. Asquith, J. Backus Mayes, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann et al.,Boosted objects and jet substructure at the LHC. Report of BOOST2012, held at IFIC Valencia, 23rd-27th of July 2012,Eur.Phys.J.C74(2014) 2792, [1311.2708]

    work page arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Adamset al., Towards an Understanding of the Cor- relations in Jet Substructure, Eur

    D. Adams et al.,Towards an Understanding of the Correlations in Jet Substructure,Eur. Phys. J.C75(2015) 409, [1504.00679]

    work page arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult and B. Nachman,Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning, 1709.04464. 232 BIBLIOGRAPHY233

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Kogleret al., Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: Experimental Review, Rev

    R. Kogler et al.,Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: Experimental Review,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 045003, [1803.06991]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    D. E. Soper and M. Spannowsky,Combining subjet algorithms to enhance ZH detection at the LHC,JHEP08(2010) 029, [1005.0417]

    work page arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    L. G. Almeida, R. Alon and M. Spannowsky,Structure of Fat Jets at the Tevatron and Beyond,Eur. Phys. J.C72(2012) 2113, [1110.3684]. [14]STARcollaboration, K. Kauder,Measurement of the Shared Momentum Fractionz g using Jet Reconstruction in p+p and Au+Au Collisions with STAR, Nucl. Phys.A967(2017) 516–519, [1704.03046]

    work page arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Catani, B

    S. Catani, B. R. Webber and G. Marchesini,QCD coherent branching and semiinclusive processes at largex,Nucl. Phys.B349(1991) 635–654

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Trentadue, G. Turnock and B. R. Webber,Resummation of large logarithms ine +e− event shape distributions,Nucl. Phys.B407(1993) 3–42

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    Luisoni and S

    G. Luisoni and S. Marzani,QCD resummation for hadronic final states,J. Phys. G42(2015) 103101, [1505.04084]

    work page arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Becher, A

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia,Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory,Lect. Notes Phys.896(2015) pp.1–206, [1410.1892]

    work page arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An introduction to quantum field theory. Westview, Boulder, CO, 1995

    work page 1995

  19. [19]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD

    J. Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD. Cambridge monographs on particle physics, nuclear physics, and cosmology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling and B. R. Webber,QCD and Collider Physics, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Campbell, J

    J. Campbell, J. Huston and F. Krauss,The black book of quantum chromodynamics: a primer for the LHC era. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    J. R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis and M. Seymour,Super-leading logarithms in non-global observables in QCD,JHEP0608(2006) 059, [hep-ph/0604094]. BIBLIOGRAPHY234

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Forshaw, A

    J. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis and M. Seymour,Super-leading logarithms in non-global observables in QCD: Colour basis independent calculation,JHEP0809(2008) 128, [0808.1269]

    work page arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo,Space-like (versus time-like) collinear limits in QCD: Is factorization violated?,JHEP1207(2012) 026, [1112.4405]

    work page arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    J. R. Forshaw, M. H. Seymour and A. Siodmok,On the Breaking of Collinear Factorization in QCD,JHEP1211(2012) 066, [1206.6363]

    work page arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Soyez,Pileup mitigation at the LHC: a theorist’s view,1801.09721

    G. Soyez,Pileup mitigation at the LHC: a theorist’s view,1801.09721

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Anastasiou, C

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger,Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 212001, [1503.06056]

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    F. A. Dreyer and A. Karlberg,Vector-Boson Fusion Higgs Production at Three Loops in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 072001, [1606.00840]

    work page arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Bloch and A

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck,Note on the radiation field of the electron,Phys. Rev. 52(1937) 54

    work page 1937

  31. [31]

    Kinoshita,Mass singularities of feynman amplitudes,J

    T. Kinoshita,Mass singularities of feynman amplitudes,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 650

    work page 1962

  32. [32]

    Lee and M

    T. Lee and M. Nauenberg,Degenerate systems and mass singularities,Phys. Rev.B133(1964) 1549

    work page 1964

  33. [33]

    Catani, M

    S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni and G. Marchesini,Non-cancelling infrared divergences in QCD coherent state,Nucl. Phys.B264(1986) 588–620

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,Nucl. Phys.B485(1997) 291–419, [hep-ph/9605323]

    work page arXiv 1997

  35. [35]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. H. Seymour,The Dipole Formalism for the Calculation of QCD Jet Cross Sections at Next-to-Leading Order,Phys. Lett.B378(1996) 287–301, [hep-ph/9602277]

    work page arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    Dokshitzer and G

    Y. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini,Soft gluons at large angles in hadron collisions, JHEP0601(2006) 007, [hep-ph/0509078]

    work page arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Dokshitzer and G

    Y. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini,Hadron collisions and the fifth form-factor, Phys.Lett.B631(2005) 118–125, [hep-ph/0508130]

    work page arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    B. I. Ermolaev and V. S. Fadin,Log-Log Asymptotic Form of Exclusive Cross-Sections in Quantum Chromodynamics,JETP Lett.33(1981) 269–272. BIBLIOGRAPHY235

    work page 1981

  39. [39]

    A. H. Mueller,On the multiplicity of hadrons in QCD jets,Phys. Lett.B104 (1981) 161–164

    work page 1981

  40. [40]

    Bassetto, M

    A. Bassetto, M. Ciafaloni, G. Marchesini and A. H. Mueller,Jet multiplicity and soft gluon factorization,Nucl. Phys.B207(1982) 189

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg,Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys.Rev.Lett.39(1977) 1436

    work page 1977

  42. [42]

    G. F. Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes. 1. Origin and Nature of Divergences in Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,Phys.Rev.D17 (1978) 2773

    work page 1978

  43. [43]

    G. F. Sterman,Mass Divergences in Annihilation Processes. 2. Cancellation of Divergences in Cut Vacuum Polarization Diagrams,Phys.Rev.D17(1978) 2789

    work page 1978

  44. [44]

    G. F. Sterman,Zero Mass Limit for a Class of Jet Related Cross-sections, Phys.Rev.D19(1979) 3135

    work page 1979

  45. [45]

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper,The theorems of perturbative QCD,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.37(1987) 383–409

    work page 1987

  46. [46]

    Chang, M

    H.-M. Chang, M. Procura, J. Thaler and W. J. Waalewijn,Calculating Track-Based Observables for the LHC,Phys.Rev.Lett.111(2013) 102002, [1303.6637]

    work page arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Chang, M

    H.-M. Chang, M. Procura, J. Thaler and W. J. Waalewijn,Calculating Track Thrust with Track Functions,Phys.Rev.D88(2013) 034030, [1306.6630]

    work page arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    A. J. Larkoski and J. Thaler,Unsafe but Calculable: Ratios of Angularities in Perturbative QCD,JHEP1309(2013) 137, [1307.1699]

    work page arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez and J. Thaler,Soft Drop,JHEP1405 (2014) 146, [1402.2657]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani and J. Thaler,Sudakov Safety in Perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev.D91(2015) 111501, [1502.01719]

    work page arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    A. J. Larkoski, D. Neill and J. Thaler,Jet Shapes with the Broadening Axis, JHEP1404(2014) 017, [1401.2158]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    P. E. L. Rakow and B. R. Webber,Transverse Momentum Moments of Hadron Distributions in QCD Jets,Nucl. Phys.B191(1981) 63–74

    work page 1981

  53. [53]

    G. P. Salam,Towards jetography,Eur. Phys. J.C67(2010) 637–686, [0906.1833]. BIBLIOGRAPHY236

    work page arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    J. E. Huth et al.,Toward a standardization of jet definitions, in1990 DPF Summer Study on High-energy Physics: Research Directions for the Decade (Snowmass 90) Snowmass, Colorado, June 25-July 13, 1990, pp. 0134–136, 1990

    work page 1990

  55. [55]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual,Eur. Phys. J.C72 (2012) 1896, [1111.6097]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Catani, Y

    S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. H. Seymour and B. R. Webber, Longitudinally-invariantk ⊥-clustering algorithms for hadron–hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys.B406(1993) 187–224

    work page 1993

  57. [57]

    S. D. Ellis and D. E. Soper,Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions,Phys. Rev.D48(1993) 3160–3166, [hep-ph/9305266]. [59]JADEcollaboration, W. Bartel et al.,Experimental Studies on Multijet Production ine + e− Annihilation at PETRA Energies,Z. Phys.C33(1986) 23. [60]JADEcollaboration, S. Bethke et al.,Experimental Investigation of the E...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  58. [58]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. Leder, S. Moretti and B. Webber,Better jet clustering algorithms,JHEP9708(1997) 001, [hep-ph/9707323]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    Wobisch and T

    M. Wobisch and T. Wengler,Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering,hep-ph/9907280

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  60. [60]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, [0802.1189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    The Catchment Area of Jets

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Catchment Area of Jets,JHEP04 (2008) 005, [0802.1188]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    F. A. Dreyer, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Lund Jet Plane,JHEP12(2018) 064, [1807.04758]. [66]CDFcollaboration, F. Abe et al.,The Topology of three jet events in¯pp collisions at √s= 1.8TeV,Phys. Rev.D45(1992) 1448–1458

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    G. C. Blazey et al.,Run II jet physics, inQCD and weak boson physics in Run II. Proceedings, Batavia, USA, March 4-6, June 3-4, November 4-6, 1999, pp. 47–77, 2000.hep-ex/0005012. [68]D0collaboration, V. M. Abazov et al.,Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section inp¯pcollisions at √s= 1.96TeV,Phys. Rev.D85(2012) 052006, [1110.3771]. BIBLIOGRAPHY237

    work page arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,A Practical Seedless Infrared-Safe Cone jet algorithm, JHEP05(2007) 086, [0704.0292]. [70]CMScollaboration,Commissioning of the Particle-flow Event Reconstruction with the first LHC collisions recorded in the CMS detector, CMS-PAS-PFT-10-001. [71]CMScollaboration,Commissioning of the Particle-Flow reconstruction in Minimum-Bias an...

    work page arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    BOOST Camp 2018

    S. Schramm and L. Schunk, “BOOST Camp 2018.” https://indico.cern.ch/event/649482/contributions/3052141/ attachments/1686853/2712969/BOOST_Camp_2018.pdf, 2017. [74]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Single hadron response measurement and calorimeter jet energy scale uncertainty with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C73(2013) 2305, [1203.1302]. [7...

    work page arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Thaler and K

    J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg,Maximizing Boosted Top Identification by Minimizing N-subjettiness,JHEP02(2012) 093, [1108.2701]. [78]ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,JINST3(2008) S08003

    work page arXiv 2012

  67. [67]

    Dispelling the N^3 myth for the Kt jet-finder

    M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam,Dispelling theN 3 myth for thek t jet-finder,Phys. Lett.B641(2006) 57–61, [hep-ph/0512210]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    J. M. Butterworth, J. P. Couchman, B. E. Cox and B. M. Waugh,KtJet: A C++ implementation of the K-perpendicular clustering algorithm,Comput. Phys. Commun.153(2003) 85–96, [hep-ph/0210022]

    work page arXiv 2003

  69. [69]

    Dasgupta, L

    M. Dasgupta, L. Magnea and G. P. Salam,Non-perturbative QCD effects in jets at hadron colliders,JHEP0802(2008) 055, [0712.3014]. BIBLIOGRAPHY238

    work page arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Principles of general final-state resummation and automated implementation,JHEP03(2005) 073, [hep-ph/0407286]

    work page arXiv 2005

  71. [71]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Semi-numerical resummation of event shapes,JHEP01(2002) 018, [hep-ph/0112156]

    work page arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Generalized resummation of QCD final state observables,Phys.Lett.B584(2004) 298–305, [hep-ph/0304148]

    work page arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    Banfi, G

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Resummed event shapes at hadron - hadron colliders,JHEP08(2004) 062, [hep-ph/0407287]

    work page arXiv 2004

  74. [74]

    Banfi, G.P

    A. Banfi, G. P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Phenomenology of event shapes at hadron colliders,JHEP06(2010) 038, [1001.4082]

    work page arXiv 2010

  75. [75]

    Dasgupta, K

    M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, S. Marzani and M. Spannowsky,On jet mass distributions in Z+jet and dijet processes at the LHC,JHEP1210(2012) 126, [1207.1640]

    work page arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Dasgupta, A

    M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and G. P. Salam,Towards an understanding of jet substructure,JHEP1309(2013) 029, [1307.0007]

    work page arXiv 2013

  77. [77]

    Reichelt,Predictions to all orders in perturbative quantum chromodynamics for high energy collider experiments

    D. Reichelt,Predictions to all orders in perturbative quantum chromodynamics for high energy collider experiments. PhD thesis, Gottingen U., Georg-August-Universit¨ at G¨ ottingen, Gottingen U., 2021. 10.53846/goediss-8933

    work page doi:10.53846/goediss-8933 2021

  78. [78]

    H¨ oche, D

    S. H¨ oche, D. Reichelt and F. Siegert,Momentum conservation and unitarity in parton showers and NLL resummation,JHEP01(2018) 118, [1711.03497]

    work page arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Marzani, D

    S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez and V. Theeuwes,Fitting the Strong Coupling Constant with Soft-Drop Thrust,JHEP11(2019) 179, [1906.10504]

    work page arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    Baberuxki, C

    N. Baberuxki, C. T. Preuss, D. Reichelt and S. Schumann,Resummed predictions for jet-resolution scales in multijet production in e +e? annihilation, JHEP04(2020) 112, [1912.09396]

    work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.