REVIEW 2 cited by
Reparameterizable Subset Sampling via Continuous Relaxations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reparameterizable Subset Sampling via Continuous Relaxations
read the original abstract
Many machine learning tasks require sampling a subset of items from a collection based on a parameterized distribution. The Gumbel-softmax trick can be used to sample a single item, and allows for low-variance reparameterized gradients with respect to the parameters of the underlying distribution. However, stochastic optimization involving subset sampling is typically not reparameterizable. To overcome this limitation, we define a continuous relaxation of subset sampling that provides reparameterization gradients by generalizing the Gumbel-max trick. We use this approach to sample subsets of features in an instance-wise feature selection task for model interpretability, subsets of neighbors to implement a deep stochastic k-nearest neighbors model, and sub-sequences of neighbors to implement parametric t-SNE by directly comparing the identities of local neighbors. We improve performance in all these tasks by incorporating subset sampling in end-to-end training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rank-Conditioned Sample Reuse for the Plackett--Luce Best-of-$K$ Objective
Rank-conditioned Horvitz–Thompson reuses all C(n,K) subsets of one Gumbel-Top-n pool for unbiased Plackett–Luce best-of-K value and score-function gradient, with an exact Max-specific DP collapse to a 1-D integral.
-
Retrieval-Augmented Personalization with Foundation Models for Wearable Stress Detection
Retrieval from out-of-domain foundation models enables personalization of a lightweight transformer for stress detection, yielding +3.92% accuracy and +4.76% F1 gains on WESAD without user labels.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.