Reply to "Comment on "How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory"

A. M. Gasparyan; E. Epelbaum; J. Gegelia; Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner

arxiv: 1903.01273 · v1 · pith:R5QK25T3new · submitted 2019-03-04 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph· hep-th

Reply to "Comment on "How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory"

E. Epelbaum , A. M. Gasparyan , J. Gegelia , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner This is my paper

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-phhep-th

keywords effectiveequationsfieldintegralpotentialsrenormalizesingulartheory

0 comments

read the original abstract

We offer a brief response to the criticism put forward by Pavon Valderrama about our recent paper on "How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory".

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Bootstrapping Two-Nucleon Effective Field Theories
nucl-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Bootstrap consistency checks show that the NLO chiral EFT potential for the 1S0 two-nucleon wave remains valid over a significantly wider energy range than the LO version when compared to Granada phase shifts.